J. Korean Soc. People Plants Environ Search

CLOSE


J. People Plants Environ > Volume 17(2); 2014 > Article
A Study on Influences and Effects of Urban Park Regeneration Which Utilizes Park Properties

ABSTRACT

The study includes two rounds of surveys on users of Tomoioka no 5 Park in Yokohama city, Kanazawa-ku, where a park regeneration project was carried out. It further includes listening research on the residents, the administrators in charge, and the park designers in the city. This research identifies how changes in the spatial components triggered by a park regeneration plan that utilizes park properties influence a park utilization pattern and the user satisfaction. The purpose of the research is to propose a future direction of urban park regeneration plans in Korea. Accordingly, in the context of the purpose of the research, following conclusions can be proposed based on the analysis of the results of the surveys. First, given that Korea is expected to actively promote a park regeneration project in the future, it can be concluded that in order to enhance user satisfaction and positive evaluation about a park, it is useful to adopt a regeneration method which identifies what park users are recognizing as park properties through research and which, based on the research, preserves and utilizes the park properties preemptively. It can be further inferred that a survey on the user awareness on the park properties is necessary. Second, Clarifying design purpose after identifying the needs of residents through resident workshops and task for an administrative part in regards to park regeneration is essential step for effectively enhancing user satisfaction through park regeneration. In particular, it has many implications to Korea that citizen’s participation is active in regards to promoting an urban park rehabilitation project including a park regeneration project.

Introduction

Urbanization has been taking place with the rapid development of cities that have undergone modernization. Many people moved to the cities for better jobs and better places to live resulting in population concentration in urban areas which was followed by indiscriminate development of city infrastructure including housing, industrial facilities, and roads. Consequently, many problems such as degradation of ecological balance and destruction of landscapes arose(Asada, 1969). At the same time, urban development enhanced quality of lives of citizens, increased people’s interest in environmental issues, and intensified people’s desire for recreational space where nature could be enjoyed. Amidst such social changes, emphasis was put on the need for an urban park that can help maintain and improve urban environment, protect people against disasters, and secure living environment(Shirahata, 1995).
Befittingly, urban parks have been actively being established since [Urban Park Law] was implemented in 1980 in Korea. [Urban Park Law] was later amended as [Act on Urban Parks and Greenbelts and etc.] under which systematic management and maintenance are being carried out. However, people’s expectation for a park changed as urban park’s role and function became more important in the living environment due to social changes including population decrease, low birth rate and aging trend, generational gap in values, and the settlement of 5 working days. Deterioration of park facilities and worsening of management quality contribute to change in people’s expectation (Hong et al, 2007). Nonetheless, lack of adequate response is causing many problems such as decrease in park usage rate and aggravation of park safety and security. Now, many local governments are promoting park regeneration projects since park regeneration through maintenance and improvement of old facilities, promotion of barrier free equipments, and planting management has been gaining the limelight as a way to resolve existing problems and a way to respond to user’s changing needs. Still, even though research on park regeneration is ongoing, most of research focuses on the process of promoting park regeneration projects through participation of park users and local residents(Kong and Yang,2011; Cho, 2008; Jung, 2009) and future regeneration method considering utilization pattern of parks(Seo, 2009; Ahn, 2005). Yet, there has not been any case-based research on change in spatial composition and utilization pattern caused by park regeneration.
Since the implementation of its [urban park law] in 1956 that was followed by [Five Year Plan for the Construction of Urban Parks], Japan has rapidly increased the number of urban parks. Having gone through similar social changes earlier than Korea, Japan faced many problems in regards to its urban parks. Responding to the problems, most of the Japanese local governments are promoting park regeneration projects actively, as a means to enhance safe use of parks and to boost local economies.
As a part of the efforts, much research on park regeneration is being conducted including; Research on how park regeneration was promoted through citizen’s participation such as resident workshops and through collaboration between residents and local governments(Amano and Masato,2002; Yasutsune, 2010; Noda, 2003); Case studies on necessary follow-up management and maintenance of park regeneration project (Shinobe et al, 2003; Sano, 2007); Research on how spatial composition changes caused by park regeneration influence user satisfaction(Oh, 2011, 2012). This case-study research reviews the changes in spatial composition and utilization pattern caused by park regeneration in Japan through user evaluation given that Japan is implementing various types of regeneration earlier than Korea. In this respect, the research is expected to contribute significantly to future park regeneration plans in Korea.
Japan is promoting park regeneration with its focus on urban areas including apartment complex, shopping centers and subway stations and is highlighting the importance of utilizing resources(Yagome and Kanno, 2011; Kaga et al., 2004; Yamaguchi and Koura, 2008) and properties of a park including spatial attributes. Some existing research touches upon the importance of park resources and properties. They include research on transforming cultural heritage into a park based on the historical point of view(Ihara, 2004, 2005), research on existence and utilization of local resources in urban park(Nishisaka et al., 2008), and research on stock management utilizing park properties(Kaneko, 2013). Nevertheless, it seems that there is no case-study research that reviews how user satisfaction and utilization pattern are influenced by changes in the spatial composition of an urban park caused by park regeneration that utilizes park properties. Existing research on park properties and resources defines park properties as unique characteristics of spatial composition such as special facilities with historical and cultural value in the given area or such as environment that needs to be preserved due to its value in disaster prevention and landscape. This research expanded the meaning of ’park properties’ and defined them as any valuable attributes of a park that can be utilized in future regeneration. Thus, ’park properties’ in the research not only includes spatial composition but also utilization pattern of a park.
Accordingly, the purpose of the research is to propose direction of Korea’s future urban park regeneration plan by identifying relationship between utilization of park properties and user satisfaction through surveys on how park users’ utilization pattern and their satisfaction are influenced by the changes in spatial composition caused by park regeneration which utilizes park properties.

Materials and Method

1. Park selection criteria for research

This Study deals with an urban park which have undergone total regeneration that utilizes existing park properties. Specifically, out of many parks that were built more than 25 years ago, those that undertook regeneration in Yokohama city, which is actively promoting urban park regeneration, were considered. Final selection was decided according to following criteria. First, regeneration should be implemented through complete maintenance and improvement of park facilities and planting. Second, a park that undertook regeneration at least within 3 years should be selected in order to ensure that park users are aware of the changes before and after regeneration. Third, the regeneration must be done by active efforts to preserve and utilize existing park properties. Tomioka no.5 park met the first and second conditions. In order to ensure that the park meets the third one, first survey was conducted. Total 50 park users including 25 people who had used the park before regeneration and another 25 who used the park only after regeneration were selected. Various maps, pictures and park regeneration project reports, including a facility demolition floor map, a facility arrangement plan, and a planting arrangement plan were reviewed to identify the characteristics of spatial composition and component after regeneration in order to create survey items. Also, utilization patterns, environment around the park, and the geographical features were checked on site. Based on what was identified, 18 survey items were selected. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple answers for questions to show what components of space and what kind of utilization pattern of Tomioka no.5 park they recognized as park properties(Table 1).
Also, they ranked three most important items that should be preserved as properties of the park. 3 points, 2 points and 1 point were given to items that ranked first, second and third respectively, which made overall score 150 points. The result was that [community festivals and events] item scored more than 75 points, which shows that the item is recognized as valuable properties of Tomioka no.5 park. According to the result, it was concluded that the park is suitable for the research.

2. Overview of the targeted area for survey

Tomioka no.5 park is a 4,728m2 - large block park that was built in March 1975(Kanazawa-ku, 2013). West Tomioka area, where the park is located, started to receive residents through
Table 1.
Overview of 1st survey.
Subject of survey Park users and residents
Survey period Feb.23th - Mar.10th, 2013 (5 time)
Number of answers / The number of valid answers 50 / 50
Item of survey Alltheitemsareforpluralreponse
Environment around the park (1 Item)
Spatial composition (4 Item)
Spatial component (8 Item)
Utilization pattern (5 Item)
Scoring : Ranked all the items from
1st to 3 rd according to the plural response
land development in 1956 and large residential area was created in the mid 1970’s. However, 30 years later, with decrease in the number of young people moving to the area, low birth rate and aging trend were rapidly spreading. Having been built through a large residential area development, Tomioka no.5 park became large in size compared to other family parks. In particular, its multi-purpose square had been used as a place for events and community festivals. But, old facilities, thick bushes and leaves due to lack of maintenance, darkened the park and resulted in messy fallen leaves. That is why the park was hardly used by residents except when they had community festivals and events in the park. In particular, even though the park is close to elementary schools and kindergartens, its security and safety became worse and concerns on possibility of safety accident prevented children from using the park. Park regeneration was carried out in March 2010 to resolve aforementioned problems. Fig. 1 highlights the location of the park.
Fig. 1.
Target park for survey.
KSPPE-17-163_F1.gif

3. Research Method

The research was carried out according to the following steps. As it is mentioned in the park selection criteria, the first survey was carried out to identify the change of user recognition of ’park properties’ of Tomioka no.5 park (Table 1). After that, listening research in a form of face-to-face visit/interview was conducted in order to check what residents are asking for; how the administrative part is perceiving the problems of the park; what is the purpose of regeneration and what is the relationship
Table 2.
Overview of listening research.
Subject of survey Survey period
Residents
President of Voluntary Group in Tomioka No.5 park July 1th, 2013
Administration
Yokohama-city hall, administrator of park and green space development Division June 20th, 2013
Designer
Rural and Urban Planning Institute co.,ltd. Representative director August 3th, 2013
Item of Survey
fiIssues and Park usage before regeneraton
fiResidents’ needs for the park and the task identified from the resident workshop
fiAbout Preservation and utilization of park properties
fiAbout the purpose and task of regneration
fiDesign intention responding to needs and goals
Evaluation on park after regeneration
Table 3.
Overview of 2st survey.
Subject of survey Park users and residents
Survey period Oct. 25th - Nov. 9th, 2013 (7 time)
Number of answers / The number of valid answers 90 / 90
Item of Survey • Usage frequency : evaluated in 5 step
• Usage time : evaluated in 5 step
• purpose of use : plural response (13 Item)
• place of use : Mapping that uses drawing maps before and after park regeneration
• Respondent Characteristics : Optional Items(3 Items)
Evaluation on park : 5 step evaluation for each item :Giving the precondition of “being compared to the pre-regeneration level” for the all the evaluation items
Park usage (4 Item)
Maintenance of facilities (4 Item)
Preservation of green space (2 Item)
Improving the image of park (3 Item)
Improving the problems of fallen leaves (1 Item)
Use of events (2 Item)
The value of the park (1 Item)
The space and the use of center of the park (4 Item)
Space near the benches and the use of it (3 Item)
User satisfaction for park (1 Item)
between the designer’s intention and actual utilization of park properties. Listening research was used for residents who participated in workshops for park regeneration, for the administrators who were in charge, and for the designers who were responsible of regeneration (Table 2).
Next, the second survey was conducted to check how user satisfaction is influenced by what was discovered from the listening research, which are the changes of utilization pattern and spatial composition that made use of park properties, design intention that responds to the needs of residents and the goal of the administrative part (Table 3).
The respondents of the onsite survey were park visitors who used the park before and after the regeneration and the second survey content is as follows; First, in order to find out utilization pattern change before and after regeneration, frequency and the amount of time for using park were surveyed. Second, 13 question items were selected, taking into account purposes of general usage of urban park, spatial characteristics of the selected park and environment near the park in order to check changes in purpose of using the park. In addition, by using drawing maps before and after regeneration, mapping of [frequently using space] was completed. Third, to find out how user satisfaction is influenced by the changes in spatial composition that utilizes park properties, 24 items were prepared. Also, the overall satisfaction was evaluated in 5 steps to verify whether the purpose of design and the goals that reflect residents’ needs are fulfilled. Having been encoded, the questionnaire was analyzed through SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Science) Win 17.0 program to deduce result.

Results and Discussion

1. Changes in spatial composition through park regeneration

Fig. 2 includes a picture and a drawing map that show changes in spatial composition caused by the regeneration of Tomioka no.5 park. The motivation for park regeneration was identified through listening research of residents, administrators in charge, and designers.
The purpose was as follows; First, To resolve the problems of usage rate decrease induced by degradation and deterioration of facilities due to the lack of quality management. Second, To fulfill the regeneration goal set forth by the administrative part including development of barrier free facilities for older people and complete improvement of rest areas. Third, To meet the needs of residents by improving the image of the park as a bright park where children can safely play and to resolve caused by1)*Firmiana simplexes.
Fig. 2.
Changes in spatial composition before and after park regeneration.
KSPPE-17-163_F2.gif
Details of changes in spatial composition through regeneration based on the aforementioned motivation were checked. First, it was confirmed that new facilities were built after having demolished all theexisting spatial components at the center of the park including pagolas, benches, and shrubs except some trees. With the purpose of strengthening the function as a rest area for eating, resting, and chatting, new facilities including 2 table benches and 2 pagolas were established. Other new facilities include 7 health exercise apparatuses aiming to enhance health of the old, and a flower bed aiming to encourage residents’ voluntary management of the park as well as to improve the image of the park. To encourage more active flower bed management and for convenience of users, a drinking fountain was moved to the center area from the westside square. Additionally, the height of boundary stones for the flower bed was aligned to 38cm making it more comfortable for people throughout all age. This can be interpreted that regeneration highlighted on making all the spatial components at the center usable for resting area when community festivals and events are held. In an attempt to resolve the issue of the falling leaves, 11 out of 15 Firmiana simplexes were cut down and 4 , located at the eastside square, were preserved for hanging Lotus lanterns at Bon Festival every summer. All other trees were maintained. Trees were pruned to give better view inside at the center. It was also discovered that mostly shrubs in the center and those near the west and east entrances were cut down to secure better sight at the park entrances. All the existing playground equipments were replaced by new ones. It was also confirmed that swings and slides were differently arranged to lessen the pressure on the inside view from the west entrance. Approach to each entrance except the stair entrance on the north side, undertook regeneration focusing on barrier free features such as leveling the roads and approaches, securing space for wheelchairs, and changing the covering on the pedestrian walkways. The square was regenerated in a way that preserves and utilizes its existing space as much as possible and also in a way that does not negatively influence community festivals and events. To be specific, the eastside square was regenerated while preserving the traffic line of *Bon Festival2)dance which is the biggest summer community festival. While the overall size of the square became smaller than the pre-regeneration level, the square regeneration was the pre-regeneration level, the square regeneration was carried out in a way that increases usable space for community festivals and events and in a way that can resolve the problem of reduced green land due to cutting down of many shrubs and 11 Firmiana simplexes by installing benches on the grass after planting it at the outer side of the square.
It is concluded from these findings that park regeneration was promoted putting its priority on enhancing usage and convenience when holding [community festivals and events] which is strongly recognized as the ’properties’ of the Tomioka no.5 park. With such priority, the park regeneration was implemented through maintenance and improvement of the central area of the park that is close to the square and through preserving and utilizing [multi- purpose square]. To be specific, it can be concluded that the regeneration intended to enhance spatial functionality of the park by concentratingresting, exercise and exchange functions at the designated center area. It also intended to secure usable area by adding new spatial components through turfing grass at the exterior of the square while maintaining the size of the multi-purpose square. It can be also deduced that the regeneration induced promotion of utilization and quality enhancement of resting areas in the square by combining benches, which are the basic spatial component for amenities, with grass, which is a natural component.

2. Change in user recognition of park properties before and after park regeneration

The first survey was conducted to identify changes in recognition of users for park properties before and after park regeneration and to select a target park for survey (Table 4). According to the result of a comparison analysis of what the park users recognize as a strength and valuable characteristics of the park before and after regeneration, the following 5 items; [large multi-purpose square], [safe environment where children can play], [walking route and traffic line], [Community festivals and events], and [Abundant nature] gained majority responses. In particular, after converting them into scores, it was discovered that [community festivals and events] and [large size multi-purpose square] are strongly perceived as park properties . The result for studying change of recognition before and after park regeneration confirmed that 5 items including [safe environment for children to play], [various health exercise apparatuses] , [walking route and traffic line], [bright park with open view], [sufficient resting facilities] are recognized as park properties more than pre-regeneration level. Out of 5 items that received more than 50% of responses, 3 items including [large size multi-purpose square], [community festivals and events], [abundant nature] did not show much difference in recognition of the respondents, meaning that users recognized these three items as park properties both before and after the park regeneration.
Based on aforementioned findings, it can be inferred that what park users recognize as the valuable properties of the Tomioka no.5 park are active communication/exchanges among residents through various events and the park square
Table 4.
User recognition and evaluation of park properties before and after park regeneration(1st survey).
Big class level Item Numberz (before) Number (after) Total number Evaluation score

Environment around the park A quiet park located near residential area 12 8 20 0
Spatial composition Large multi-purpose square 17 18 35 72
Walking route and traffic line 7 21 28 6
Bright park with open view 7 17 24 27
It is not confusing because the space is divided according to different purpose for usage 3 5 8 0

Spatial component Sufficient playground equipment 0 3 3 0
Many large trees 9 3 12 10
Various health exercise aparatus 0 7 7 0
Abundant nature 15 15 30 53
Sufficient lighting 0 1 1 0
Mature and rich green space 6 3 9 5
Sufficient resting facilities 5 14 19 5
Various planting 13 8 21 9

Utilization pattern Safe environment where children can play 6 19 25 13
Community festivals and events 21 17 38 77
Peaceful with sense of resting 5 3 8 1
Taking a walk and jogging are possible 8 7 15 10
Possible to observe birds and insects 7 3 10 2

z Number (before) : The number of responses from the respondents who used the park before the regeneration.

Number (after) : The number of responses from the respondents who used the park after the regeneration.

that can serve as a multi-purpose space including walking, exercising, festivals and events. As it is mentioned in 3-1, it was implied that what users are recognizing as new park properties after regeneration include attributes that make park usable not only for special events but also for everyday activities and the fact that the park is perceived as a bright park where children can safely play by installing table benches and health exercise apparatuses, developing barrier free facilities near the entrance, and establishing a flower bed and maintaining plantings.

3. Change in utilization pattern caused by park regeneration

The second survey was conducted on the park users who visited the park both before and after regeneration in order to identify utilization pattern change caused by regeneration. Five steps evaluation method was chosen to find out frequency and time for park use before and after regeneration and the average from the five-step evaluation was compared through a t-test. [Usage frequency] and [usage time] showed significant difference before and after regeneration (Fig. 3). This result shows that the park is being used more frequently and for longer time period compared to the pre-regeneration level. Inother words, it can be inferred that the changes in spatial composition through regeneration are having a positive impact on promoting the use of the park.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of utilization pattern before and after park regeneration. *indicates significant difference Average.
KSPPE-17-163_F3.gif
Next, to identify changes in the purpose of using the park after regeneration, purpose of using park before and after regeneration was compared and analyzed through a simple calculation method (Fig. 4). [Taking a walk] and [Cherry blossom viewing], which were the main purpose of using the park before regeneration, did not show much change. However, people’s purpose to use the park including [exercising and sports], [resting] [talking with friends] [eating] [attending events] and [volunteer work in the park] are reinforced strongly compared to pre-regeneration level.
Fig. 4.
Comparison of purpose of park use through regeneration.
KSPPE-17-163_F4.gif
It can be deduced from these findings that expansion of the role of the park and the scope of park utilization are attributable to the establishment of health exercise apparatuses, pagolas, table benches, and the flower bed at the center, as well as the opening of various events through the preservation and utilization of the square.
Then, in order to find out the changes of space used in the park caused by regeneration, a frequently used place before and after park regeneration was surveyd and compared for analysis. (Table 5, Fig. 5). The result shows that there is not much change in [playground equipment], [planting], and [sandy field] before and after park regeneration. However, compared to the pre-regenerational level, the number of users of [westside
Table 5.
Change of using space in the park before and after regeneration.
Place Before After

Mapping number

① Westtside square 14 33
② Eastside square 49 73
③ Entrance 2 3
④ Beanch 13 38
⑤ Central 14 49
⑥ Playground equipment 18 20
⑦ planting 12 10
⑧ Sand field 13 9
⑨ Flower bed* - 29
⑩ Health exercise apparatu* - 39

Total 135 303

* Established through the park regeneration.

square], [Eastside square], [bench], [Central (table bench)], [flower bed], and [health exercise apparatus] soared as well as the number of mapping.
Fig. 5.
Change in space in use in the park before and after regeneration.
KSPPE-17-163_F5.gif
Based on these findings, it can be concluded that park usage pattern has changed as a result of regeneration with its design intention on enhancing convenience in community festivals and events. This included utilizing the square as much as possible and improving aged facilities by installing new ones, improving the park image through flower bed establishment and inducing voluntary management of residents.
Through these findings it was inferred that the unique value of its space and usage of the park was maintained while park usage was promoted and became manifold by park regeneration. This followed a clear design intention that incorporated the needs of residents and the goal of administrative part through resident workshops together with preservation and utilization of the multi-purpose square where various events, which are perceived as a important component of Tomioka no.5 park, are held.

4 Evaluation on the park through regeneration

24 items for evaluation based on residents needs, task of administrative part that are discovered through Listening research, preservation and utilization of park properties and consequent design intention were used to show how they influenced user satisfaction. Survey was conducted with the precondition of “being compared to the pre-regeneration level” for the all of the research items and on the users who used the park before and after the regeneration. First, 5 steps were taken for each item and then average score was calculated(Table 6). As a result, all the items in regards to [park usage], [maintenance of facilities], [preservation of green tract of the land], [improving the image of park], [Use of community festivals and events], [the value of the park], [The space and the use of center of the park], [space near the benches and the use of it], [user satisfaction for park] gained more than an average of 3.5 points. In particular all items in regard to [preservation of green tract of the land ], [improving the image of park], [Use of community festivals and events], [user satisfaction for park] received more than an average of 4.0 points. However, items such as [improving the problems of fallen leaves] gained less than an average of 3.0 points.
Next, the correlation between the 24 evaluation items and user satisfaction was analyzed through SPSS bivariate correlation analysis in order to identify the influence that each evaluation item has on user satisfaction of the park (Table 7). As a result, user satisfaction for the park and the items including [park usage], [preservation of green tract of the land ], [improving the image of park], [Use of community festivals and events], [the value of the park], and [The space and the use of center of the park] showed significantly positive correlations of 1% with park visitors’ satisfaction. In particular, among many sub items of [park image improvement], [Do you feel safe using park as it became brighter?] and [Do you enjoy the park through various events] under the item [use of community festivals and events] and [is it more convenient joining community festival and events compared to pre-regeneration period?] under the item [The space and the use of center of the park] were found to have strong positive correlations with user’s satisfaction.
It can be induced through these findings that improving aged playground equipments, benches and pagolas and establishing a flower bed, health exercise apparatuses, table benches, and barrier free equipments at the entrances for the old resolved problems of usage reduction and the safety issues due to degradation of the park followed by aging and lack of management and helped improve park image as bright and safe park, which in turn resulted in high score and high satisfaction on each item. Not only that, preservation and utilization of park properties that the original park already had influenced high level satisfaction of the users thanks to the regeneration that utilized rich natural characteristics by preserving all the trees except Firmiana simplexes, installation of a flower bed, grass planting of space adjacent to the square, and preservation of the size of the multi-purpose square in a way that does not interfere with community festivals and event. Also, all the items under [The space and the use of center of the park] item scored more than 3.5 points in evaluation and it is believed to have a positive correlation of 1% with user satisfaction. These findings can be interpreted that in a park with relatively small in size can have sufficient user satisfaction by enhancing variety of park usage patterns and convenience of using the park through promoting spatial function of the park in a way that concentrates various spatial components in the designated area. However, despite cutting down 11 Fimiana simplexes out of total 15, [improvement in solving falling leaf problems] scored less than 3.0 points, which shows that the problem cannot be solved only by reducing the number of the trees. It was inferred that to respond to the problem, it is important to have continuous and systematic management of the green land and trees in the park through fostering voluntary management by volunteer groups that consist of residents such as Voluntary Group in park.
Therefore, the purpose of this research on Tomioka no.5 park in Yokohama city in Japan is to propose direction of Korea’s future urban park regeneration plan by identifying relationship between utilization of park properties and user satisfaction through surveys on how park users’ utilization pattern and their satisfaction are influenced by the changes in spatial composition caused by park regeneration that utilizes park properties.
The results of this research can be summarized as follows; First, It can be said that park regeneration that preserves and utilizes spatial composition and utilization pattern that are strongly perceived as park properties contribute to the high
Table 6.
Evaluation of the park after regeneration (5 step evaluation).
Big class level Evaluation items Mean S.D

Park usage A1 4.36 0.825
A2 4.20 0.824
A3 4.06 0.826
A4 3.87 0.997

Maintenance of facilities A5 4.30 0.710
A6 3.86 0.610
A7 3.97 0.880
A8 4.32 0.732

Preservation of green space A9 4.39 0.760
A10 4.09 0.967

Improving the image of park A11 4.42 0.599
A12 4.13 0.753
A13 4.10 0.794

Improving the problems of fallen leaves A14 2.89 1.106

Use of events A15 4.38 0.773
A16 4.11 0.867

The value of the park A17 4.38 0.907

The space and the use of center of the park A18 4.21 0.800
A19 4.12 0.859
A20 3.78 0.832
A21 4.36 0.783

Space near the benches and the use of it A22 3.74 1.001
A23 3.52 1.104
A24 3.82 0.894

User satisfaction for park 4.42 0.793

S.D = Standard Deviation.

level of satisfaction and positive evaluation while strengthening the effect of the regeneration. More attention was placed on the importance of developing a new research method to identify properties of the existing park based on the opinions of park users. This study analyzes the effects and influence of a park regeneration method that utilizes and preserves park properties after identifying them through studying user’s point of view. In this respect, in the face of increasingly difficult environment for establishing new urban park due to hardship in securing necessary space and funds, the research can help propose a future direction for park regeneration in Korea, which is expected to be
Table 7.
The relationship between the evaluation of the park and actual satisfaction.
Big class level Evaluation items Satisfaction (correlation coefficient)

Park usage A1 .472**
A2 .420**
A3 .427**
A4 .555**

Maintenance of facilities A5 251*
A6 .197
A7 .391**
A8 .441**

Preservation of green space A9 .470**
A10 .419**

Improving the image of park A11 .614**
A12 .432**
A13 .432**

Improving the problems of fallen leaves A14 .169

Use of events A15 .635**
A16 .405**

Big class level Evaluation items Satisfaction (correlation coefficient)

The value of the park A17 .448**

The space and the use of center of the park A18 .534**
A19 .640**
A20 .451**
A21 .551**

Space near the benches and the use of it A22 0.109
A23 .233*
A24 .281**

** Correlation coefficient is significant at the level of 0.01(two-tailed).

promoted in full gear.
Second, Clarifying design purpose after identifying the needs of residents through resident workshops and task for an administrative part in regards to park regeneration is essential
Table 8.
Evaluation items List (Table 6, 7).
No Detailed contents of Evaluation items
A1 Do you use the park more often?
A2 Did it increase the frequency of park usage in daily basis?
A3 Can you do various activities in the park with large space?
A4 Did your use of park strengthen your communication and relationship with residents?
A5 Did slope and handle at the entrance make it easy to enter the park?
A6 Did sufficient playgrounds increase children’s use of the park?
A7 Has ‘health exercise apparatus’helped you exercise?
A8 Can you take a good rest in the park due to sufficient resting facilities?
A9 Is green space preserved in the park?
A10 Can you enjoy nature in the park through matured green environment?
A11 Do you feel safe using park as it became brighter?
A12 Did tramps and juvinille delinquens disappear from the park?
A13 Do you feel that the park became brighter due to planting management?
A14 Did cutdown of Firmiana simplex reduce dead leaves in the park?
A15 Do you enjoy the park through various events?
A16 Can you now enjoy various events in the park?
A17 Do you think that it is afriendly park that goes with a quiet residential area and that can be located close to elementary school?
A18 Is it more convenient to move around in the park compared to pre-regeneration?
A19 Is it more convenienct joining community festival and events compared to pre-regeneration?
A20 Do you have more feild of vision inside of the park compared to pre-regeneraton?
A21 Has it become more convenient to use the park compared to pre-regeneration?
A22 Did the size of the green tract of the land in the park increase due to turfing of the exterior part of the square?
A23 Despite turfing of the exteior part of the square, was the size of the square maintained?
A24 Has it become more convenient to use the park compared to pre-regeneration?
step for effectively enhancing user satisfaction through park regeneration. In particular, it has many implications to Korea that citizen’s participation is active in regards to promoting an urban park rehabilitation project including a park regeneration project. It can be concluded that conducting a user satisfaction survey by creating evaluation items based on the findings in regards to the needs of the residents, the task for the park that an administrative part has, and the design intention that reflects the needs and the task has a potential as an evaluation method to verify effectiveness of a park regeneration project.
The research reviewed a regeneration project for future planning by identifying how utilization pattern is influenced by changes in spatial components through park regeneration. It can be said that in order to find out how useful a park regeneration project is to revitalize a region that is likely to be deteriorated due to low birth rate and aging trend, it is necessary to conduct further research on the revitalization of a region that identifies how a park regeneration project improved the living environment of the region and that reviews how the changes in spatial components and utilization pattern of a park revitalized the regional community. Accordingly, further research will be necessary to thoroughly evaluate influence that park regeneration has on the region in terms of environmental, economic and social aspect based on case studies of park regeneration projects with various scale.

Notes

Firmiana simplexes:アオギリ in Japanese. These deciduous trees reseed mainly in Southeast Asia and southern part in Korea. They are 15-20 meters tall and their leaves start to fall from the early autumn. Due to their relatively strong resistance against wind and air polution, they are often planted in the park and on the roads.

Notes

Bon Festival : As a famous summer community festival in Japan, Bon festival plays an important role in strengthening solidarity of the community and enhancing communications and interchange among residents. It is usually held in the park square in August and people form a circle and dance to the music on the stage built at the center of thesquare.

적요

본 연구는 공원자산을 활용한 공원재정비에 의한 공간구성의 변 화가 이용형태 및 이용만족도에 미치는 영향을 파악하여, 향후 한 국의 도시공원의 재정비사업의 계획론적인 관점에서의 방향성을 제시하기 위해, 요코하마시 카나자와구의 토미오카 no.5 공원의 재 정비사례를 대상으로 2회의 걸친 공원 이용자 설문지 조사와 지역 주민, 행정 담당자, 재정비공원 설계자를 대상으로 청취 조사를 실 시하였다. 조사를 통해 확인 된 결과를 분석하여 향후 한국의 도시 공원 재정비사업의 방향성에 대해 다음과 같이 제시할 수 있다.
첫째, 향후 공원재정비 사업의 적극적인 추진이 예측되는 한국 에 있어서 공원자산에 관한 이용자의 인식도조사를 통해 파악된 공 원자산을, 적극적으로 보존 및 활용한 재정비 수법은 공원의 평가 와 만족도향상에 유효하며, 공원 자산을 파악하기 위해 이용자에 대한 인식도 조사가 필요하다고 할 수 있다. 둘째, 재정비를 위한 주 민설명회에서 확인 된 공원에 대한 지역주민의 요구와 지자체의 공 원재정비의 목적과 과제의 파악을 통해, 이에 맞춰 명확한 설계의 도를 설정하는 것은 이용자 만족도 향상에 효과적인 재정비 사업의 프로세스라고 볼 수 있으며, 재정비를 포함한 도시공원정비 사업추 진에 시민참여가 활발히 이루어지고 있는 한국에 시사하는 바가 크다고 볼 수 있다.
Ⅳ.
Ⅳ.

References

Ahn H.J. Research for regeneration method of major cities -Subject to Geum gang Park-. PhD dissertation. Pusan National Univ. Pusan. Korea 2005.

Amano Y, Masato D.H. Design features of participatory renewal process on Narai-park Okazaki city, Aichi pref. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2002;65(5): 731–734.
crossref
Asada T.S. Environmental development theory. Kajima Institude Publishing Co. Ltd 1969.

Cho D.H. A study on plan of the resident participation park remodeling focused on the participatory design techniques in community. MS thesis, The University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea 2008.

Hong S.K, Lee M.W, Lee S.M, Ahn M.J. Searching for facilities and service programs for the establishment of urban park identification. Journalof the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 2007;35(5 ): 29–36.

Ihara Y. The historical research on how the cultural heritage opened to the public and changed over time in the Tamamo-park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2004;67(5): 387–392.
crossref
Ihara Y. The historical research on how the cultural heritage opened to the public and changed over time in the Ritsurin-park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2005;68(5): 389–394.
crossref
Jung J.W. Reproduction of children's park through visitors participation. MS thesis, Chonnam National Univ., Gwangju 2009.

Kaga H.Y, Machi Y.S, Shimomura Y.H, Masuda N. A study on the change of the old resident's favorite open space and trees between before and after replacing housing estates. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2004;67(5): 697–702.
crossref
Kaneko T.K. Draft planning guideline for extending the lifetime of park facilities. Environmental Information Science 2013;42(1): 34–37.

Kong Y.K, Yang H.S. The greative regeneration and daily life on urban park -the case of jeonpodolsan park in busan -. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers 2011;17(5): 582–599.

Nishisaka R.K, Tahara N.K, Kamihogi A.H. A study on existence situation and use realities of regional resources in city park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2008;71(5): 615–618.
crossref
Noda H.S. Process of partnership formation : A case study on the citizen participation to the planning and management of a park in Yokohama- city. Technical Report of Kyoto Prefectural University 2003;55:247–259.

Oh E.S, Yeom S.J, Kinoshita T. Research of relationship between change of spatial composition utilization pattern and satisfaction by park regeneration. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology 2011;37(1): 257–260.
crossref
Oh E.S, Ikebe T.K, Yeom S.J. A Study on the changes of utilization and spaces in regenerating urban small park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2012;75(5): 471–476.
crossref
Sano K.N. Regeneration of hinokicho park -Tokyo midtown preject and park regeneration-. Urban Park 178:47–51.

Seo J.Y, Sung H.C. A study on the user's actual condition and analysis of spatial organization on the urban park - focusing on lawn and green areas-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 2009;12(6): 99–111.

Shinobe H, Sunamoto F.H, Kato S.N. A study on method of architectural professional education connected with the local community case study of houei-higashi park redesign in kure city. Journal of the Architectural Institute of japan 2003;18:399–402.

Shirahata Y.B. Research of modern urban park history. Shibunkaku Publishing Co. Ltd 1995.

Yagome Y.T, Kanno H.T. A quantitative analysis of the exterior spaces in kodan housing areas to consider their use as an urban environmental resource. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 2011;74(5): 663–666.
crossref
Yamaguchi Y.T, Koura H.K. Study on evaluation of regional resources and building use in center shopping street in local city : In case of the downtown of Hyogo Prefecture Toyooka City. Architectural Institute of Japan, Kinki Branch 2008;48:429–432.

Yasutsune M. A case study on the citizen participation to the regenerating for a park in Fukuoka-city. Memoirs of the Chikushi Jogakuen University 2010;5:163–173.

TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Crossref
  •    
  • 883 View
  • 3 Download
Related articles in J. People Plants Environ.


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
100, Nongsaengmyeong-ro, Iseo-myeon, Wanju_Gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-63-238-6951    E-mail: jppe@ppe.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by The Society of People, Plants, and Environment.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next