Identification of Ecological Characteristics of Vegetation Distributed in Mt. Chilbosan, Gyeonggi-do

Article information

J. People Plants Environ. 2023;26(6):769-791
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 December 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.769
1Professor, Department of Landscape Architecture, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 52725, Republic of Korea
2Doctoral Student, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 52725, Republic of Korea
3Master Student, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 52725, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author: Chung-Hyeon Oh, hco0970@naver.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-7262
First author: Soo-Dong Lee, ecoplan@gnu.ac.kr, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-8850
The authors wish to acknowledge a grant-in-aid for research from Gyeonggi Green Environment Center (Research No. 22-05-01-70-76)
Received 2023 September 11; Revised 2023 October 11; Accepted 2023 October 27.

Abstract

Background and objective

Urban forests fulfill a range of functions, including promoting leisure activities and improving urban landscapes, but are different in structure from natural forests. In the case of forests near the Seoul metropolitan region, forests dominated by native tree species must be formed, but vegetation management that involves in minimal intervention is essential due to external disturbances, artificially planted species, and invasive species. This study was conducted to preferentially survey the vegetation status of Mt. Chilbosan, Gyeonggi-do with the goal of contributing to the sound use and management of the mountain.

Methods

Eighty quadrats were established, and the species names and characteristics for each stratum were surveyed by dividing them into canopy, understory, and shrub layer. Based on the surveyed vegetation data, communities were classified through TWINSPAN or DCA analysis, and the characteristics of each community were examined.

Results

The plant communities were classified into a total of 7 dominant groups: Quercus mongolica, Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus koraiensis. Communities dominated by Quercus mongolica and Pinus rigida had similar species and vegetation structures. Communities dominated by artificially planted tree species such as Castanea crenata, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus koraiensis are distributed around the forest edges or frequently used hiking trails and are damaged by various disturbances. Overall, not only is it difficult for succession to proceed due to external influences and soil acidification, but because species with high adaptability to acidity are also expected to emerge, making long-term monitoring necessary.

Conclusion

Mt. Chilbosan had a good environment, but it was disturbed by a low elevation, a drop in the groundwater level due to surrounding development, and an increase in visitors. To improve the current state, it is necessary to induce and manage the transition to native forests adapted to the urban environment by reflecting the vegetation structure’s characteristics and changes.

Introduction

Urbanization, which is rapidly spreading worldwide, is accompanied by population growth and concentration, industrialization, and construction, causing serious environmental problems (Uttara et al., 2012; Rai, 2017; World Health Organization, 2017; Russo and Cirella, 2018; Solomou et al., 2019). The high-rise and densification of urban areas, as well as the expansion to the outskirts of forests and rural areas, causes a reduction in green space, loss of biodiversity, air pollution, river eutrophication, smog, noise, and vibration, which hinders the coexistence of humans and other living things in the environment (Buchavyi et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2021; Acharya and Acharya, 2023). Even in South Korea, the population began to flow into the Seoul metropolitan region following its period of rapid economic growth in the 1970s (Choi, 1984). When the first new cities in the Seoul metropolitan region, including Bundang and Ilsan, were developed to disperse this population, it appears that the damage to farmland and forests began in earnest (Vongpraseuth and Choi, 2014). While development-oriented urban plans to accommodate and disperse the growing population resulted in the early establishment of urban infrastructure, the living environment in cities deteriorated, causing damage to nature, destruction of ecological balance, and a lack of leisure space (Yeom and Park, 2011). This caused microclimate phenomena such as urban heat islands, leading to quantitative and qualitative declines in the environment, including the proliferation of invasive species due to abnormal climate, simplification of vegetation structure, and reduction of species diversity, as well as forest fragmentation and loss of ecological buffer zones attributable to the indiscriminate development (Oh et al., 2005; Oke, 1997; Cho, 1997). Since restricting urbanization is not a realistic means of preventing this environmental degradation, there is a need to minimize the impact on the environment (Uttara et al., 2012). In addition, securing sufficient parks and green spaces appears to be essential to maintain and provide sustainability and ecosystem services.

As people’s education, living standards and their awareness of the importance of parks and green spaces improved, the demand for urban green space began to increase (Kong et al., 2014). This has also been reflected in people’s residential choices, and the terms “soopsekwon” and “ghongsekwon” which mean spheres of influence of forests and parks, respectively, were coined and used as a marketing strategy (Myoung et al., 2020). When the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2019, led to the closure of public facilities including libraries and indoor playgrounds, the number of visitors to green spaces such as forests and parks increased, and these were used as places for relaxation and recreational activities (Kim et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2021). Urban green spaces are known to have environmental and ecological functions that include maintaining biodiversity, reducing noise and air pollution, and mitigating extreme climate events, as well as other effects such as providing opportunities for exposure to nature, and improving quality of life and health (World Health Organization, 2017). In addition, it was reported that there is a need to create green spaces in downtown areas because it is important for residents’ physical activities and mental health (Buchavyi et al., 2023). According to Russo and Cirella (2018), and the World Health Organization (2012), humans need daily contact with nature; furthermore, they concluded that urban green space (UGS) is very important for them even at a societal level as urban residents are happier and healthier when the minimum UGS value required per capita is exceeded.

Meanwhile, urban forests are not only important ecological resources that perform functions that include promoting people’s leisure activities and improving urban landscapes, but are also improving environmental soundness by controlling the environment through impacts such as preservation of the natural ecosystem, carbon absorption, and cooling effects (Jang et al., 2002; Kwon et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2018). In the Creation and Management of Urban Forest Act enacted in 2020, urban forests are defined as forests and trees created and managed in cities to promote public health and recreation, emotional development, and experiential activities. Despite this definition, researchers differ somewhat on the concept of an urban forest (Grey, 1996; Miller, 1997; Strom, 2000; Kwon et al., 2004). Even in the law, issues have been raised that the definition is only regulated comprehensively, making the spatial scope unclear (Kwak and Park, 2022; Kwak et al., 2021). Vegetation contained in urban forests not only has the function of preserving the ecosystem and urban environment from an ecological perspective, but is also a key element in maintaining the well-being of residents and the sustainability of cities (Chiesura, 2004). In particular, it plays a major role in alleviating urban heat islands and microclimates and improving the environment (Yang et al., 2022; Buchavyi et al., 2023; Russo and Cirella, 2018), while also being closely related to quality of life through promoting leisure activities and forming aesthetic landscapes (Kim et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2021; World Health Organization, 2012). However, it was reported that as such vegetation has a different structure from that in natural forests (No, 2015; Dwyer et al., 1992), accurate surveys and management are necessary to strengthen the overall ecosystem services, including improving the environment and quality of life.

In a study on the vegetation structure of urban forests, it was reported that forests near the Seoul metropolitan region were supposed to be dominated by native tree species including Carpinus laxiflora, Quercus acutissima, and Quercus serrata, but severe urbanization and use by residents have resulted in such vegetation being rare (Park et al., 2009; Lee et al., 1997). Although mountains located in downtown Seoul, including Namsan, Gwanaksan, Daemosan, and Suraksan, have natural vegetation such as Quercus mongolica, Pinus densiflora and Quercus acutissima, they appear to have been damaged by the colonization of invasive species including Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus rigida (Lee et al., 2006a; Jang et al., 2013; Kong et al., 2014). In addition, even in the mountains Cheongnyangsan, Bulgoksan, and Bulamsan, as planted tree species including Pinus rigida, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Larix kaempferi are more dominant than natural vegetation, it was suggested that vegetation management is required (Oh et al., 1988; Lee et al., 2021; Lee and Shim, 2017). As a result, since tree species introduced for the purpose of mountain restoration and fuel forests dominate rather than native species in urban forests close to urban areas (Kim et al., 2012; Lim, 1994; Kim, 1993) the opinion has been expressed that vegetation management by minimal intervention is required for ecological succession.

Mt. Chilbosan, our study site with many wetlands in the past, is of high ecological value, as protected species including Metanarthecium luteo-viride, Habenaria radiata, and Drosera rotundifolia are distributed mainly in abandoned rice fields and mountain wetlands in the valley (Suwon Environmental Movement Center, 1998). It was reported that flora on the mountain, located in the southwestern part of Gyeonggi-do, close to Seoul, has been seriously damaged by continuous interference including new town development, overpopulation, artificial afforestation after forest fires, and visits by hikers (Ko and Shin, 2009; Lee, 2019; Suwon Environmental Movement Center, 1998). However, natural vegetation in some areas of the mountain had been damaged by the planting of Pinus rigida and Robinia pseudoacacia and the invasion of Magnolia obovata, a naturalized species.

Currently, there seem to be no protected species left due to a decline in groundwater levels that resulted from surrounding developments, illegal harvesting, and use in areas other than wildlife protection areas in Suwon and Ansan, and various ecological surveys of the study site, Mt. Chilbosan, have been conducted (Suwon Environmental Movement Center, 1998; Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC), 2006; Lee et al., 2015; National Institute of Ecology, 2018; Lee, 2019; Lee et al., 2022). Notably, KNHC (2006) prepared an actual vegetation map and conducted a plant community survey of the site. Based on this, it was found that Pinus rigida plantations occupy most of the site, many of which were undergoing ecological succession to Quercus spp.. This study, conducted more than 15 years after such surveys, aimed to determine whether changes in the surrounding environment affected vegetation succession in order to provide basic data for the sound use and management of Mt. Chilbosan, a key green space for the establishment of green networks.

Research Methods

Overview of the study site

Mt. Chilbosan is a low hill with an altitude of 238.5 m above sea level which is located on the border of three cities including Suwon, Hwaseong, and Ansan in Gyeonggi-do. The average temperatures in January, the coldest month, are −2.1°C, −3.2°C, and −2.1°C for Suwon, Ansan, and Hwaseong, respectively, putting them in the temperate climate based on Köppen climate classification. There are 761 species under 413 genera and 127 families, and 65 naturalized species scattered throughout the Chilbosan area (Lee et al., 2022). In addition, it has been identified that about 40 species of wetland plants, including four species of rare plants such as Drosera rotundifolia, Utricularia japonica, Utricularia racemosa, and Utricularia bifida, are growing naturally in abandoned rice paddies and small wetlands in the valley.

There are 13 major hiking trails managed inside Mt. Chilbosan, and the main ridge, which starts from Chilbo Yaksuteo, a mineral spring, and connects to Cheoncheon Interchange, is 6,558.7 m long. Topographically, the south is high, with steep slopes and rocky areas centered on the summit, and the east, west, and north have low ASL; the overall slope is relatively gentle with a slope of less than 30 to 40° (KNHC, 2006). Looking at the land use status of the surrounding area, in some parts of the west slope, the Korea Forest Service’s experimental plantations are located in the center and north, and military facilities in the south. On the eastern slope, there are Seoul National University Forests, and large-scale buildings including public institutions such as Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health and Environment, Gyeonggi-do Animal Hygiene Testing Laboratory, and Gyeonggi-do Construction Headquarters. In addition, as large-scale residential complexes are being built around forest edges and farmland, the risk of lower groundwater levels and forest damage seems to increase. Notably, the Seoul National University Forests cover an area of 104 ha, which is a large area that includes most of the eastern slope and summit, as well as the longest main ridge (Lee, 2007).

Mt. Chilbosan, which was desolate land in the 1930s, has achieved a restored forest physiognomy through afforestation for erosion control; the main tree species in the forest, including the experimental forest, is Pinus rigida, the first species introduced to Korea (KNHC, 2006). Looking at the area ratio of tree species by tree type based on the forest type map at 1:5,000 scale in 2022 provided by the Korea Forest Service, conifers occupy the largest area at 63.4%, followed by broadleaf trees (16.2%), mixed forests (13.8%), the remaining arable land, nonstocked forest land, and water resource (6.5%). While among the conifers, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida occupy a relatively larger area at 31.5% and 29.2%, respectively, among broad-leaved trees, other broad-leaved trees and other Quercus spp. species account for a larger proportion of 9.4% and 4.3%, respectively (Lee et al., 2022).

Methods

As it is not practical to survey the entire forest to determine its vegetation status, it is common practice to determine the overall characteristics using representative communities identified by conducting a sample survey (Park et al., 1993). By using representative vegetation, whether vegetation stratification was formed, inclinometer and GPS recording device (GPSMAP 64s, Garmin) based on the forest type map, we sought to determine the characteristics of plant community structure by randomly setting 80 quadrats in areas with topographical changes (Fig. 1). Each survey plot was based on a square of 10m × 10m (100 m2). Considering the tree species and height, and topographical structure, one to four survey plots were set together, and then species name for each topographical structure and stratum, diameter at breast height (DBH), and crown diameter (CD) were surveyed. Each stratification was classified into three strata: canopy with a DBH of 2 m or more or a tree height of 2 m or more and receiving direct sunlight; understory, which is the middle stratum; and shrub layer with a height of less than 2 m. The DBH was measured for the canopy and understory, and the CD was measured for the shrub layer. For the shrub layer, one overlapped quadrat with an area of 5 m × 5 m was installed on the left and right sides of the edge of the survey plot; the species that appeared and the CD were recorded, and the number of individuals that appeared was quadrupled and used for analysis.

Fig. 1

The location map of study site and plant community survey plots in Mt. Chilbosan.

To compare the relative dominance of tree species by stratum that appeared in quadrats, the relative dominance was analyzed by crown stratum, which was expressed as an importance percentage (IP; Curtis and McIntosh (1951); Brower and Zar, 1977). The IP was estimated as (relative density + relative coverage)/2 for each species. In addition, considering the relative size of each individual, the mean IP (MIP) was calculated by assigning weights to each crown stratum: {(canopy IP × 3) + (understory IP × 2) + (shrub layer IP × 1)}/6 (Yim et al., 1980; Park, 1985; Oh and Choi, 1993). To classify plant communities, a two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) for classification and ordination were performed, respectively, based on the vegetation survey results (Hill 1979a; 1979b). Based on the results of community classification, Shannon’s formula was applied to estimate and comprehensively examine the measures of diversity in species composition in each community: species diversity (H’), maximum diversity (H’ max), evenness (J’) and dominance (D’) (Pielou, 1975). In addition, to identify the similarity between communities, the similarity index was calculated using Whittaker’s formula (1956), and the distribution by DBH class was analyzed to compare changes in dominance for each tree species. The number of species and populations for each community was calculated based on a unit area of 100 m2, and when two or more survey plots were set together, the average values for each survey plot were derived and compared with other communities.

To determine the physicochemical properties of the soil, a total of 35 samples were collected, one sample for each quadrat; a quadrat had been established in one survey plot or groups of 2 to 4 survey plots. After removing the organic surface layer with accumulated fallen leaves, samples were collected from the topsoil layer (layer A), air-dried, and filtered using a 2 mm sieve. Then, the samples were analyzed for soil pH, organic matter content, cation exchange capacity, available phosphate, and electrical conductivity (National Academy of Agricultural Science, 2000). At 54 survey plots, available phosphate was found to be below 0.5ppm, the minimum value for instrumental analysis, and thus the analysis thereof was excluded from this study.

As TWINSPAN indirectly analyzes environmental gradients based only on the species composition of plant communities, it may not be easy to derive environmental gradients from communities with many accidental species (Sasaki et al., 2015; Park et al., 2018). To complement this, a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was conducted to identify the relationship between vegetation and ten environmental factors, including topography, soil’s physicochemical characteristics, and growth environment, for 80 survey plots (Ter Braak, 1986). By examining the structure and species composition of the vegetation in the study site based on the results of classification, ordination, distribution by DBH class, and soil physicochemical analysis (Choung et al., 2006), we sought to comprehensively determine the degree of succession progress and species that may appear in the future.

Results and Discussion

Ecological characteristics of vegetation

Community classification and general overview

By classifying plant communities using TWINSPAN, Division 1 was broadly divided into a group in which Quercus mongolica (−) did not appear as an indicator species, and a group in which Castanea crenata, Quercus acutissima, and Corylus heterophylla (+) appeared. The group in which Quercus mongolica did not appear (Division 2) was divided into a group in which Quercus mongolica and Rhododendron mucronulatum did not appear, and a group in which Quercus serrata, Castanea crenata, and Smilax china appeared. The former (Division 4) is finally determined as Community 1 where Quercus acutissima did not appear and Community 2 where Pinus rigida was an indicator species; the latter (Division 5) was finally determined as Community 3 where Pinus rigida and Quercus serrata did not appear and Community 4 where Castanea crenata and Quercus dentata were indicator species. The group in which Castanea crenata, Quercus acutissima, and Corylus heterophylla were indicator species was divided into a group in which Quercus serrata and Corylus heterophylla did not appear (Division 6) and Community 7. Division 6 was divided into Community 6 where Robinia pseudoacacia was an indicator species, and Community 5 where Robinia pseudoacacia was not an indicator species. As such, the survey plots were classified into a total of seven communities (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

The dendrogram of 80 plots classified by TWINSPAN classification.

The eigenvalue of each axis derived from DCA was 0.5172 for axis 1, 0.3700 for axis 2, and 0.2938 for axis 3. As the concentration was high on axes 1 and 2 with the explanatory power of 88.78%, the communities were classified based on those axes (Fig. 3). They were divided into a total of seven communities: from the left, Quercus mongolica (I), Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida (II), Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora (III), Pinus rigida-Quercus spp. (IV), Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima (V), Robinia pseudoacacia (VI), and Pinus koraiensis (VII). Among various environmental factors in the distribution of communities, it is estimated that axis 1 was affected by aspect (direction) and axis 2 by altitude above sea level (ASL). Although the results of community classification using TWINSPAN was clear, they have the disadvantage of the properties of each community not being clearly displayed due to overlapping indicator species between communities. Therefore, in this study, the vegetation of survey plots was classified into 7 communities based on the DCA analysis results.

Fig. 3

DCA ordination of 80 plots in Mt. Chilbosan (I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis).

Table 1 shows the ASL, aspect, slope, and specifications of dominant species by stratum for the seven communities. The survey plots had an elevation of 64-226 m above sea level and a slope of 2–60°, and the aspect was set to all directions. Looking at each community, Communities Quercus mongolica and Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, which were dominated by Quercus mongolica, were mainly distributed in the northwest or northeast direction, with an altitude of about 140 m or more above sea level, and a slope of about 25° or more. Among the Pinus rigida dominant communities, the community competing with Pinus densiflora was located on a steep slope with an altitude of approximately 129.4 m and a slope of approximately 27°. On the other hand, the community competing with the Quercus spp. was located in relative lowlands, with an altitude of approximately 98 m and a slope of 14°. Castanea crenata and Pinus koraiensis in small areas were located on gentle slopes at the border with urbanized areas or lowlands, below 100 m above sea level, and Robinia pseudoacacia were located on flat areas along ridges.

General description of the physical environment and vegetation of the survey site

The tree height of the canopy was 15m or higher in all communities excluding Community Pinus koraiensis, and the coverage was mostly around 70%. The tree height of the understory was 4–5 m for Communities Quercus mongolica, Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, and Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, while it was 6 m or higher for the remaining communities. The coverage was 30% or more for the communities excluding the Quercus mongolica dominant communities, with a good stratification structure.

Importance percentage and species status

Table 2 shows the importance percentage (IP) and mean IP (MIP) of major woody plants in the seven communities classified based on DCA analysis. In the canopy of Community Quercus mongolica, Quercus mongolica (IP: 72.9%) was dominant, whereas in the understory and shrub layers, Sorbus alnifolia (IP: 45.8%) and Quercus mongolica (IP: 24.2%), and Rhododendron mucronulatum (IP: 34.6%) and Quercus mongolica (IP: 27.5%) competed, respectively. In the canopy of Community Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, Pinus rigida (IP: 66.4%) and Quercus mongolica (IP: 22.1%) co-appeared, but in the understory and shrub layers, Quercus mongolica, a tall tree, was dominant with IP of 65.7% and 40.4%, respectively.

Importance percentage of major woody plants by the stratum in 7 communities Scientific Name

For Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., Pinus rigida was dominant in the canopy with IP of 82.8% and 82.1%, respectively, but Quercus mongolica, Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, and Castanea crenata were dominant in the understory. In the canopy of Community Pinus rigida, Pinus rigida dominated and the status quo was expected to be maintained, but in the understory, deciduous Quercus spp., including Quercus mongolica, Quercus serrata, and Quercus acutissima, were becoming dominant, and were highly likely to compete with the former in the future.

In the canopy of Community Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, Castanea crenata (IP: 43.5%) and Quercus acutissima (IP: 25.1%) were competing, whereas in the understory and shrub layers, Castanea crenata was dominant. This community, which was formed on a low-lying, gentle slope, had low coverage of understory vegetation due to trampling by people to collect chestnuts. In the canopy and understory of Community Robinia pseudoacacia, Robinia pseudoacacia dominated with IP of 69.6% and 40.3%, respectively, but was competing with tall trees, Quercus spp. including Quercus acutissima, Quercus mongolica, and Quercus serrata. In the shrub layer, Corylus heterophylla (IP: 28.4%), Robinia pseudoacacia (IP: 22.3%), and Rhododendron mucronulatum (IP: 12.6%) co-appeared.

In Community Pinus koraiensis, Pinus koraiensis (IP: 77.0%), which was planted in the canopy, dominated, but as it was not managed, Quercus mongolica, Castanea crenata, and Styrax japonicus were dominant in the understory. However, Magnolia obovata, a naturalized species that appeared in other communities, was not observed.

Diameter at breast height (DBH)

Looking at the distribution status of the main species appearing in each community by DBH class (Table 3), in Community Quercus mongolica, 10 Quercus mongolica trees or more were observed for each DBH class of 12–27 cm, respectively, and 248 trees were observed in the shrub layer; whereas 1–7 Pinus rigida trees for each DBH class of 7–22 cm appeared, but were not observed in the lower layers. In Community Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, for each DBH class of 7–27 cm, 10–37 individuals of Pinus rigida, 11–18 individuals of Quercus mongolica, and 3–10 individuals of Pinus densiflora appeared and competed. However, for DBH class of 7 cm or less and the shrub layer, only Quercus mongolica was observed. In Community Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, Pinus rigida was dominant, with 6–36 individuals appearing for DBH classes of 7 cm or more, while only 1–5 individuals of Pinus densiflora were observed. Quercus mongolica was not flourishing with 1–6 individuals appearing for DBH classes of 7 cm or more, but 375 individuals appeared for DBH classes of 7 cm or less along with the shrub layer, becoming more dominant in the lower layers. In Community Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., for DBH classes of 7 cm or more, 1 to 49 Pinus rigida trees were observed; while for DBH classes of 7 cm or less and shrub layers, the populations of Castanea crenata, Quercus acutissima, Quercus mongolica, and Quercus serrata were increasing, where competition with deciduous Quercus spp. was expected in the future.

DBH distributions of major woody species by community (Units: cm)

In Community Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, Castanea crenata was dominant over other species, with 1–58 individuals appearing for all DBH classes of 0–57 cm and 285 individuals appearing in the shrub layer. For two competitive species, 21 Quercus acutissima trees appeared only for DBH classes of 12–32 cm; 2 individuals of Prunus jamasakura were observed for DBH classes of 32 cm or more, and 12 individuals for DBH classes of 0–22 cm, suggesting that Castanea crenata will remain dominant. Even in Community Robinia pseudoacacia, Robinia pseudoacacia was dominant with 1–18 individuals appearing for all DBH classes of 0–37 cm, but Quercus mongolica and Quercus serrata were observed to be 10 individuals or less for each DBH class of 0–27 cm, indicating that the status quo will be maintained for a long period of time. In Community Pinus koraiensis, Pinus koraiensis was dominant with 14 individuals appearing for DBH classes of 12–27cm, but the population of Quercus mongolica was increasing for DBH classes of 12cm or less and the shrub layer.

Species status, diversity, and similarity

Table 4 shows the number of species and population appearing in each stratum per unit area (100m2) of the seven communities. The number of species appearing in each survey plot ranged from 3 to 21, and the average number of species appearing in each community ranged from 7.2 to 11.6. In the two communities dominated by Pinus rigida, the most species were observed, with over 10 species appearing. The mean population ranged from 6.7 to 11.8 individuals for the canopy, 7.7 to 14.5 for the understory, and 38 to 107.2 for the shrub layer, with Community Robinia pseudoacacia being the largest at 129.6 individuals.

Mean number of species, population, and diversity indices by community (Units: 100 m2)

Species diversity was high at around 0.8 for Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., and Pinus koraiensis, while it was low at around 0.6 for Community Robinia pseudoacacia, and the two communities dominated by Quercus mongolica. Species evenness also showed the same results as species diversity, with Community Pinus koraiensis being the highest at 0.826. The dominance of Community Robinia pseudoacacia was the highest at 0.329, which seemed to be a result of the rare appearance of tree species other than Robinia pseudoacacia.

In terms of the similarity between communities (Table 5), it was high at approx. 70% between Communities Quercus mongolica and Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, between Communities Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida and Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, and between Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida-Quercus spp.. While the similarity between Communities Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida and Pinus rigida-Quercus spp. was high at around 50%, the similarity between the communities dominated by Quercus mongolica and Community Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima or Community Robinia pseudoacacia was approx. 20%, making them heterogeneous communities.

Similarity index among 7 communities

Soil properties

By analyzing the physicochemical properties of soil by community (Table 6), it was found that the mean soil acidity (pH) ranged from 4.17 to 4.57, with no significant difference by community. The mean soil pH of Community Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima was the highest at 4.57, and that of Community Robinia pseudoacacia was the lowest at 4.17. The mean electrical conductivity (EC) ranged from 0.07 to 0.15 dS/m, and in contrast to soil pH, the mean EC of Community Robinia pseudoacacia was the highest at 0.15 dS/m, while Community Pinus koraiensis was the lowest at 0.07dS/m. The mean organic matter content (OM) by community ranged from 3.34 to 7.69%; the mean OM of Communities Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus koraiensis were higher than that of other communities at 7.61% and 7.69%, respectively. As for exchangeable cations content, Community Robinia pseudoacacia with the lowest pH had the highest mean of 2.94 cmol/kg, while Community Quercus mongolica had the lowest mean of 0.33 cmol/kg.

Soil physicochemical properties by community

Relationship between environmental factors and vegetation

By classifying forest vegetation in 80 survey plots into 7 communities and analyzing CCA ordination and 11 environmental factors including topographical characteristics (e.g., ASL and slope) and soil physicochemical properties, axes 1 and 2 with an eigenvalue of 67% were selected and schematized (left diagram in Fig. 4). However, since the exchangeable cation values of two study plots corresponding to Robinia pseudoacacia communities were high and seemed to have a significant effect on the results, the right diagram was schematized by re-analyzing the survey plots excluding the two (right diagram in Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

A CCA ordination diagram of vegetation communities respect to environmental variables in Mt. Chilbosan (■: Quercus mongolica, □: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, ▲: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, △: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., ♦ : Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, ⋄ : Robinia pseudoacacia, ●: Pinus koraiensis).

ASL and slope among topographical factors, and pH and K+ among soil physicochemical properties were found to be environmental factors that affect vegetation distribution. ASL and K+ on Axis 1, and slope and pH on Axis 2 showed a high correlation. The two communities dominated by Quercus mongolica, and Community Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora were analyzed to be mainly distributed in steep slopes at high ASL. Communities Pinus rigida-Quercus spp. and Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima were distributed in places with high pH and, while Communities Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus koraiensis were growing in places where the values of all factors were generally low.

Community characteristics and succession trends

Urban forests not only play a major role in improving the urban environment through alleviating microclimates, preserving natural ecosystems, and absorbing carbon (Yang et al., 2022; Buchavyi et al., 2023; Russo and Cirella, 2018), but are also closely related to quality of life, having effects such as promoting leisure activities and creating and maintaining good landscapes (Lee et al., 1993; Kim et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2021; World Health Organization, 2012; Jang et al., 2002; Kwon et al., 2004; Chiesura, 2004; Lee et al., 2018). From an ecological perspective, they have biodiversity and environmental conservation functions, but have different species composition and vegetation structure from natural forests (No, 2015; Dwyer et al., 1992).

In terms of vegetation, natural forests are generally dominated by Carpinus laxiflora or deciduous Quercus spp., but forest vegetation in or near cities has a distorted structure, including development in peripheral areas, dominance of exotic species, and unformed lower layers due to excessive use (Park et al., 2009; Lee et al., 1997; Yi and Choi, 2000). For Seoul, it was reported that although natural vegetation was dominant, the inside of forests is colonized by exotic species including Pinus rigida, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Castanea crenata, and has the characteristic of being dominated by tree species that are highly adaptable to the urban environment (Lee et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2006a, 2006b; Jang et al., 2013; Kong et al., 2014; Han et al., 2014; Ro et al., 2015). As the mountains Cheongnyangsan, Bulgoksan, and Bulamsan located in the Seoul Metropolitan region were dominated by Pinus rigida, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Larix kaempferi rather than natural vegetation, it was suggested that they need to be managed to restore biodiversity (Oh et al., 1988; Lee et al., 2021; Lee and Shim, 2017).

Though urban forests are essential to the lives of urban residents, the closer they are to urban areas, the more they are typically dominated by tree species introduced for the purpose of mountain restoration and fuel forest rather than native species, due to external disturbance (Kim et al., 2012; Korea Forest Service, 2011; Lim, 1994; Kim, 1993). Ultimately, it seems that vegetation management through minimal intervention based on accurate surveys is required to improve the overall functions of ecosystem services of urban forests, including improving the environment and quality of life.

Mt. Chilbosan, located on the border of Suwon, Hwaseong, and Ansan, was ecologically sound enough for protected species including Metanarthecium luteo-viride, Habenaria radiata, and Drosera rotundifolia to grow, mainly in abandoned rice paddies and mountain wetlands in the valley. However, a decline in the groundwater level due to surrounding development, illegal harvesting, and use currently prevents such species from growing in areas other than wildlife protection areas. The natural vegetation of the study site has been damaged by external factors including various development plans for forest edges and farmland and a high number of visitors, as well as the planting of exotic species such as Pinus rigida and Robinia pseudoacacia, and invasion of the naturalized species Magnolia obovata (Suwon Environmental Movement Center, 1998; KNHC, 2006; Ko and Shin, 2009). Mt. Chilbosan and the surrounding forests are key green spaces not only for people’s leisure activities but also for the establishment of green networks. Therefore, we conducted this study as it appeared that understanding the status of vegetation should be a priority for the sound use and management of the mountain.

To determine the characteristics of the plant community structure on Mt. Chilbosan, 80 survey plots were set considering dominant species, topography, and vegetation structure, and then the species and specifications for each vegetation stratum were surveyed. Vegetation in the plots was classified into 7 communities: Quercus mongolica, Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus koraiensis. Environmental factors affecting the emergence of communities were found to be topography such as ASL and slope. This is consistent with the earlier finding that the factor that has the greatest effect on vegetation distribution is ASL (Yun et al., 2022).

In general, it has been reported that forests near cities are dominated by non-native species, including Robinia pseudoacacia, Pinus rigida, and Larix kaempferi, which were planted along with native species, and the study site also had similar vegetation and community characteristics (Lee et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2006a; Kong et al., 2014; Lee and Shim, 2017; Lee et al., 2021). Looking at the characteristics of plant community structure by community, for Communities Quercus mongolica and Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, Quercus mongolica dominated, or was competing with Pinus rigida in the canopy, but in the lower layers, Quercus mongolica was thriving. Since Quercus mongolica is a cool-temperate deciduous broadleaf tree that is distributed horizontally up to Onseong-gun, Hamgyeongbuk-do and vertically up to 1,800 m above sea level (Chung and Lee, 1965; Jang and Yim, 1985), the study site with an altitude of 239 m was confirmed to be a suitable habitat. Meanwhile, on Mt. Chilbosan, Pinus rigida was planted for the first time in South Korea in the 1930s to improve the devastated state (KNHC, 2006). The DBH class and growth status of the species at the study site were good. For Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., Pinus densiflora, or Quercus mongolica, Quercus acutissima, and Quercus serrata seemed to appear and compete in the canopy, but Pinus rigida was dominant and the status quo was expected to be maintained. However, for Pinus rigida dominant communities, the population of Pinus rigida was high in the middle or high DBH class, while the pattern of rapid decline in the population in the lower classes was repeated. In the long term, it was expected that Pinus rigida would be eliminated through competition. It was reported that the succession of temperate forests generally progresses from planted species or evergreen conifers to Quercus spp. (Lee et al., 2021); and that in the Seoul metropolitan region, the Quercus spp. community will be maintained in its current state even if its seedlings and saplings do not appear in the lower layers (Han et al., 2022; Yun et al., 2022). For Communities Quercus mongolica and Pinus rigida in the study site, since Quercus mongolica appeared in high density in the lower layers, and the succession of evergreen conifer and planted stands tends to progress to deciduous forest, it was expected to be maintained or succeeded to communities dominated by Quercus mongolica (Kim et al., 2016). Kim and Oh (1993) suggested that changes in vegetation can be predicted through distribution analysis by DBH class; for populations appearing by DBH class, Pinus rigida generally had a high frequency of appearance for DBH classes of 7–22 cm, while Quercus mongolica appeared at high density even for the DBH class of 2cm or less and the shrub layers. As for urban forests, tree species that are highly adaptable to urban environments, including Sorbus alnifolia and Styrax japonicus, tend to appear (Lee et al., 2006b; Kwak, 2011; Han et al., 2014), but as other tree species appeared on Mt. Chilbosan, it seems that the forest was less damaged.

Exotic species including Magnolia obovata and Robinia pseudoacacia were reported to be distributed mainly in open areas which were not covered by the canopy (Han et al., 2014), but in this study site, they appeared in all communities except Community Pinus koraiensis, growing not only on the periphery but also inside (Table 2). Robinia pseudoacacia is highly likely to be naturally eliminated in the early stages of succession, while Magnolia obovata is highly likely to germinate after dispersal. If the latter occupies the canopy in the future, species diversity is likely to decrease (Kwon, 2014), so long-term monitoring of its spread seems to be necessary.

Communities dominated by representative planted species, Castanea crenata, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus koraiensis, were distributed around forest edges, or hiking trails frequently used, and had been damaged by various disturbances. Community Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, in the canopy of which Castanea crenata was flourishing, seems as though it will maintain its current status in the future, although it had been damaged by repeated use for chestnut harvesting in the lower layers. For Community Robinia pseudoacacia, it was expected that if deciduous Quercus spp. flourish in the lower layers, the succession would proceed to these species (Song et al., 2023). However, as Quercus mongolica, Quercus acutissima, and the like in this study site did not flourish, no change was expected. If external disturbances are removed, or use is reduced, it seems that the succession to the native Quercus spp. will proceed (Lee et al., 2009). For Community Pinus koraiensis, as the vegetation in the lower layers is managed, the status quo is maintained, but to increase biodiversity, it is necessary to introduce or partially remove native species (Bae et al., 2011).

Among the planted stands distributed in urban forests, it was suggested that communities dominated by Pinus rigida or Robinia pseudoacacia are likely to change when native species appear in the lower layers, but the succession will not proceed smoothly (Lee et al., 2021). However, in the lower layers of this study site, as Quercus mongolica is becoming dominant, succession to a Quercus mongolica community can be expected (Jang et al., 2013). Meanwhile, Pinus rigida, a plantation species native to North America, occupied approx. 26% of the 1.713 million ha of planted stands (Kim et al., 2012; Korea Forest Service, 2011), while Robinia pseudoacacia began to be planted for the purpose of restoring mountain areas and creating fuel forests, and was planted in an area of approx. 0.32 million ha by 1978 (Lim, 1994; Kim, 1993). Since, in summary, urban forests are composed of natural forests where Quercus mongolica, Pinus densiflora, and the like grow, and planted stands where Pinus rigida and Robinia pseudoacacia dominate (Oh et al., 1988), it appears that vegetation management involving minimal intervention should be implemented for ecological succession to improve ecosystem services. Consequentially, since urban forests are in a damaged state, there is a need to make efforts to fundamentally improve the environment (Han et al., 2022) and manage the forests using native species adapted to the urban environment by reflecting the characteristics and changes in vegetation structure.

Species diversity was low in communities where succession had progressed to Quercus mongolica, whereas it was high at around 0.8 in Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., and Pinus koraiensis. This was in line with the finding of Kwak et al. (2013) that species diversity increases during the succession stage. However, compared to Bukhansan National Park, and the mountains Cheongnyangsan, Namsan, Gwanaksan, Ansan, and Bongsan in the Seoul metropolitan region, where species diversity was 1.0 or higher (Lee et al., 2021; Jang et al., 2013; Han et al., 2022; Kang and Bang, 2001), those communities had lower diversity overall. There are findings that the low species diversity is attributable to a decrease in the number of species in the shrub and herb layers over time, leading to a simplification of the plant community structure (Kim et al., 2021), but there seems to be a difference since Mt. Chilbosan is located in the Seoul metropolitan region and has not reached its climax. Another study presented the finding that species diversity decreases where understory vegetation is damaged and the dominance of a single species increases (Han et al., 2022). This seems to be related to to the situation that Quercus mongolica, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus rigida thrived in the canopy and lower layers. To improve species diversity, Lee et al. (2021) suggested the following: prevention of soil acidification, supplementation of native species, prevention of excessive expansion of species adapted to urbanization, protection of understory vegetation, and species with hygropreference, and management that leads to a multi-layered vegetation structure.

For similarity between communities, it was high at around 70% between Communities Quercus mongolica and Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, between Communities Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida and Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, and between Communities Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida-Quercus spp. It was presented that since communities with a high degree of similarity generally have similar environments favorable for survival, their species composition and vegetation structure become similar (Cox, 1976). It seemed that the high similarity between Quercus mongolica-dominant communities and Pinus rigida-dominant communities, which are in competition in the succession sequence on Mt. Chilbosan, is because the succession is progressing from Pinus rigida, a planted species, to Quercus mongolica (Kwak, 2011; Park, 2016). In addition, although there were some differences in topographical structure, communities dominated by Quercus spp. and Pinus densiflora were found to have high environmental similarities: high soil acidity, and the appearance of Magnolia obovata, Sorbus alnifolia, and Styrax japonicus, which are indicator species for changes in the urban environment. Whereas the similarity between communities dominated by Robinia pseudoacacia, Castanea crenata, and Pinus koraiensis, and between communities dominated by Quercus mongolica and other communities, was analyzed to be heterogeneous at approx. 20%. This seemed to be attributable to the status that succession had already progressed and developed into a specialized community, and that the lower layers had been damaged by artificial disturbance. Notably, if the similarity was 20% or less, such communities were not likely to co-exist, which seems to be due to exclusivity that resulted from mutual competition between species, and differences in location such as ridges or valleys.

As for soil environments by community, the soil acidity (pH), which affects the content of organic matter and exchangeable cations, ranged from 4.17 to 4.57, and was analyzed to be similar or slightly lower compared to 4.16–5.13 on Mt. Surisan, Gyeonggi-do (Lee et al., 1997), 4.40 on Mt. Namsan, Seoul (Han et al., 1997), and 4.59 on Mt. Cheongnyangsan, Incheon (Lee et al., 2021). However, the pH range is not much different from pH 4.3, the average acidity of forest soil in South Korea according to Lee and Koo (2020), which seems to be low overall since most Korean soils, derived from granite and granitic gneiss, have a low cation exchange capacity (CEC), making it highly likely that nutrients will be leached (Cho et al., 1998; Jeong et al., 2003).

As for organic matter content (OM), long-term monitoring was necessary, based on the findings on urban forests suggesting that tree species highly resistant to environmental pollution, including Sorbus alnifolia and Styrax japonicus, may frequently appear where the soil becomes acidic and the OM is low (Lee et al., 1998; Woo et al., 2000; Kwak, 2011). The soil properties of forests in the Seoul metropolitan region were similar to those of forests which had a clear tendency to acidify and reduce CEC (Jang et al., 2013). However, it seemed that the large differences in soil properties between communities were caused by locational conditions including slope, aspect, and ASL, rather than the dominant communities.

Regarding the vegetation structure of urban green spaces, it was predicted that deciduous Quercus spp. would decline and pollution-resistant species including Styrax japonicus, Acer pseudosieboldianum, and Sorbus alnifolia would increase due to low OM, acidification, and environmental pollution (Lee et al., 2000; Lee et al., 1998; Woo et al., 2000; Kwak, 2011; Jang et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2006a; Han et al., 2022). Mt. Chilbosan, the study site, was not only close to the downtown of Suwon City, but also had a poor soil environment with active forest use. It seemed that it would be difficult for a forest with these environmental conditions and vegetation structure to achieve succession to Carpinus laxiflora forests, known as the climax species, in temperate climates. It further appeared that areas currently dominated by exotic species including Pinus rigida, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Castanea crenata would undergo succession to Quercus mongolica, which was dominant in the lower layers. However, since it seems to be difficult for succession to proceed due to external disturbance and soil acidification, and species with high adaptability to acidic soil are expected to appear, it is necessary to monitor the forest on a long-term basis. Moreover, the results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for follow-up research and management of urban forests.

Conclusion

The expansion of cities into the outskirts has resulted in decreased green spaces, microclimate change, and loss of biodiversity. In the long term, this led to the proliferation of exotic species, simplified vegetation structure, and reduction of species diversity, beginning to deteriorate urban environments. In this process, as citizens’ awareness of the importance of parks and green spaces was enhanced, and outdoor leisure activities increased due to the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic, the need for urban green spaces was raised. Among them, urban forests, including Mt. Chilbosan, not only satisfy citizens’ needs for green spaces, but also play a major role in addressing various environmental problems. However, the mountain is prone to disturbance, which is attributable to low ASL, a decline in groundwater level resulted from surrounding development, illegal harvesting, and an increased number of visitors, and has a species composition and vegetation structure that are different from natural forests. It was the first area where Pinus rigida was planted in the 1930s to improve its degraded condition, and as of 2006, its overall forest physiognomy had a larger area of coniferous forests (80%) than broadleaf forests (20%). However, its forest type map in 2022 shows a decreasing trend in coniferous forests, with coniferous trees at 63.4%, broadleaf trees at 16.2%, and mixed forests at 13.8%. Ultimately, the forest on Mt. Chilbosan is in the process of succession to a natural forest dominated by deciduous Quercus spp. including Quercus mongolica and Quercus acutissima from planted stands dominated by Pinus rigida and Robinia pseudoacacia. However, as it is located near the downtown and exposed to the risk of damage as a result, it is in need of vegetation management. Notably, based on our survey of the plant communities, as a natural succession from planted stands to natural forest is in process, there is a need to minimize artificial disturbance right now caused by use. To increase the naturalness and diversity of urban forests in the future, it is necessary to induce succession to forests of native species adapted to the urban environment by reflecting the characteristics and changes in vegetation structure. It seems that this restoration of naturalness should be achieved through vegetation management by minimal intervention to strengthen the functions of ecosystem services of urban forests located near cities and at low ASL.

As for Magnolia obovata, not only is it distributed at high density in disturbed areas such as the periphery, but it is also observed to appear sporadically within the forest, so a detailed survey appears to be necessary. Since it is spreading on Mt. Chilbosan, management should be conducted to prioritize the removal of large trees, and saplings distributed around them, based on the results of a survey conducted in the winter when the leaves have fallen.

References

Acharya K.R., Acharya H.. 2023;Urbanization and carbon emission in South Asia. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences 5(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v5i1.56286.
Chiesura A.. 2004;The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003.
Brower J.E., Zar J.H.. 1997. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company.
Bae B.H., Yoon Y.H., Kim J.H.. 2011;Vegetation structure and ecological restoration of disturbed forest due to artificial plant. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 20(6):701–710. https://doi.org/10.5322/jes.2011.20.6.701.
Buchavyi Y., Lovynska V., Samarska A.. 2023;A gis assessment of the green space percentage in a big industrial city (Dnipro, Ukraine). Ekológia(Bratislava) 42(1):89–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2023-0011.
Chang C.Y., Park S.H., Seol A.R.. 2021;Factors affecting changes in forest recreational activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 110(4):711–723. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2021.110.4.711.
Cho H.J.. 1997. Forest science information Seoul, Korea: National Institute of Forest Science.
Cho S.J., Park C.S., Um D.I.. 1998. Soil science Seoul, Korea: Hyangmunsa Publishing.
Choi B.S.. 1984;Prospects and challenges of metropolitan population concentration and the effects of metropolitan area planning and population concentration suppression. Urban Affairs 19(2):62–75.
Choung H.L., Chun Y.M., Lee H.J.. 2006;Progressive succession and potential natural vegetation on the forest vegetation in and surrounding Daegu, Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment 29(3):265–275.
Chung T.H., Lee W.C.. 1965;A study of the korean woody plant zone and favorable region for the growth and proper species. Thesis Collection of Sunkyunkwan University 10:329–366.
Cox G.W.. 1976. Laboratory manual of general ecology Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company.
Curtis J.T., McIntosh R.P.. 1951;An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32(3):476–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725.
Dwyer J.F., Mcpherson E.G., Schroeder H.W., Rowntree R.A.. 1992;Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 18(5):227–234. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1992.045.
Grey G.W.. 1995. The urban forest: Comprehensive management Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Han B.H., Choi J.W., Yeum J.H., Lee K.J.. 2014;Characteristics of vegetation structure of managed area by oak wilt disease in Bukhansan National park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 28(3):342–356. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.25.3.342.
Han B.H., Park S.C., Kim J.Y., Kwak J.I.. 2022;Ecological characteristics and changes of Quercus mongolica community in Namsan (Mt.), Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 50(2):41–63. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2022.50.2.041.
Hill M.O.. 1979a. Twinspan-A fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes Ithaca, NY:
Hill M.O.. 1979b. Decorana-A fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging Ithaca, NY:
Jang C.S., Seok H.D., Jang W.H.. 2002;Improvement plan for urban forest management policy. Journal of Rural Development 25(2):123–143.
Jang J.H., Han B.H., Lee K.J., Choi J.W., Noh T.H.. 2013;A study on the characteristics and changes of vegetation structure of the plant community in Mt. Kwanak. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 27(3):344–356.
Jang Y.S., Yim Y.J.. 1985;Vegetation types and their structures of the Piagol, Mt. Chiri. Journal of Plant Biology 28(2):165–175.
Jeong J.H., Kim C.S., Goo K.S., Lee C.H., Won H.G., Byun J.G.. 2003;Physico-chemical properties of Korean forest soils by parent rocks. Korean Society of Forest Science 92(3):254–262.
Jeong J.H., Koo K.S., Lee C.H., Kim C.S.. 2002;Physio-chemical properties of Korean forest soils by regions. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 91(6):694–700.
Kang H.K., Bang K.J.. 2001;Vegetation structure and restoration model for naturalness of Robinia pseudo-acacia forest in the case of Korean national capital region. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 15(2):159–172.
Kim C.S., Oh J.G.. 1993;Phytosociological study on the vegetation of Mt. Mudeung. Journal of Ecology and Environment 16(1):93–114.
Kim J.M., Song S.H., Kim J.H., Kim S.H., Kim J.Y., Kim J.H.. 2022;The roles of city parks for improving urban resilience in the post-COVID-19 Era - Focusing on the perception of Seoul city park visitors-. The Journal of Culture Contents (26):249–272. https://doi.org/10.34227/tjocc.2022..26.249.
Kim J.S., Jeon C.H., Jung S.C., Kim C.S., Won H.G., Cho J.H., Cho H.J.. 2016;A comparison of species composition and stand structure of the forest vegetation between inhabited and uninhabited Island in the South Sea, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 30(4):771–782. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.4.771.
Kim J.W.. 1993. Silviculture technique of Robinia pseudoacacia . The 7th Honeybee industry lesson Seoul, Korea: Korea Research Society of Robinia pseudoacacia.
Kim M.S., Yun S.J., Park C.W., Choi W.I., Chun J.H., Lim J.H., Bae K.H.. 2021;Sequential changes in understory vegetation community for 15 years in the long-term ecological research Site in central temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest of Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 35(3):223–236. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2021.35.3.223.
Kim Y.K., Lee W.K., Kim Y.H., Oh S.Y., Heo J.H.. 2012;Changes in potential distribution of Pinus rigida Caused by climate changes in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 101(3):509–516.
Ko S.C., Shin Y.H.. 2009;Flora of middle part in Gyeonggi province. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 22(1):49–70.
Kong W.S., Kim K.O., Lee S.G., Park H.N.. 2014;Landscape ecology and management measure of urban mountain forest in Seoul. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 23(3):208–219. https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2014.23.3.208.
Korea Forest Service. 2011. Statistical yearbook of forestry 2011 Daejeon, Korea: Author; Retrieved from https://dl.nanet.go.kr/.
Korea National Housing Corporation. 2006. A study on the establishment of a conservation plan for the natural ecosystem of Mt. Chilbo Sungnam, Korea: Author; Retrieved from https://ecoarchive.org/.
Kwak J.I.. 2011. A study on vegetation structure characteristics and ecological succession trends of Seoul Urban Forest, Korea. Doctoral dissertation Seoul National University; Seoul, Korea:
Kwak D.A., Park S.H.. 2022;Study on spatial change of urban forest considering definition of urban area in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 25(4):19–31. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2022.25.4.019.
Kwak D.A., Lim J.S., Moon G.H.. 2021. Current status of domestic and international urban forest definitions and research systems Seoul, Korea: National Institute of Forest Science.
Kwak J.I., Lee K.J., Han B.H., Song J.H., Jang J.S.. 2013;A study on the vegetation structure of evergreen broad-leaved forest Dongbaekdongsan (Mt.) in Jeju-do, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 27(2):241–252.
Kwon H.G., Shin W.S., Kim J.J.. 2004;The comparison of use benefits based on types of urban forest. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 8(2):37–46.
Kwon O.J.. 2014. The study on the characteristics of distribution and naturalization of Magnolia obovata in forests of Korea. Doctoral dissertation Dongguk University. Seoul, Korea:
Lee A.L., Koo N.I.. 2020;Comparison of soil physicochemical properties according to the sensitivity of forest soil to acidification in the Republic of Korea. Korean Society of Forest Science 109(2):157–168. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2020.109.2.157.
Lee C.S., Cho Y.C., Shin H.C., Lee C.H., Lee S.M., Seol E.S., Oh W.S., Park S.A.. 2006b;Ecological characteristics of Korean Red Pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) forest on Mt. Nam as a long term ecological research (LTER) Site. Journal of Ecology and Environment 29(6):593–602. https://doi.org/10.5141/jefb.2006.29.6.593.
Lee H.J., Cho S.S., Kang M.S., Kim J., Lee H.T., Lee M.S., Jeon J.H., Yi C.Y., Janicke B., Cho C.B., Kim K.R., Kim B.J., Kim H.S.. 2018;The quantitative analysis of cooling effect by urban forests in summer. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 20(1):73–87. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2018.20.1.73.
Lee H.S.. 2007. Landscape design for Chil-Bo Mt. arboretum of Seoul national university. Master’s thesis Seoul National University; Seoul, Korea:
Lee J.B., Choi H.S., Hwang B.Y., Lee I.K., Lee J.M., Lee K.M., Kim K.N., Kim Y.J.. 2015. Research on survey and management measures to establish biosphere protection area in Ansan, Gyeonggi-do Ansan, Korea: Ansan Green Environment Center; Retrieved from https://www.agec.or.kr/.
Lee J.B., Shim K.K., No E.R., Ha Y.M.. 1998;A Study of ecological and growth characteristics of Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia) for landscape woody plants. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 26(2):229–239.
Lee K.J., Han B.H., Lee S.D.. 2000;A study on the plant ecosystem decline of urban forest (1) -Namsan, Changdokkung. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
Lee K.J., Kim J.H., Ki K.S., Han B.H.. 2006a;Change for eleven years (1994–2005) of plant community structure of major community in Namsan, Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 20(4):448–463.
Lee K.J., Lee S.D., Jang J.S., An I.S.. 2005;Creation techniques of ecological park to consider urban forest ecosystem in Woomyeonsan urban nature park, Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(4):79–96.
Lee K.J., Min S.H., Han B.H., Kim H.S.. 1997;Plant community structure analysis in Gunpo experimental forest of Mt. Suri, Kyonggi-do. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 11(3):290–390.
Lee K.J., Cho W., Ryu C.H.. 1993;A study on the ecological management planning of urban forest. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 20(4):1–11.
Lee S.D., Lee K.J., Choi J.W.. 2009;Management plan to consider ecological characteristic of Pinus densiflora community in Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(3):258–271.
Lee S.H., Shim J.K.. 2017;Vegetation of Mt. Bulgok. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation 16(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2017.16.1.1.
Lee S.D., Cho B.G., Oh C.H., Jin M.H., Park G.S., Seo Y.H.. 2022. A Survey on the Conservation of Wetlands in Mt. chilbo Yongin, Korea: Gyeonggi Green Environment Center; Retrieved from https://ggec.or.kr.
Lee S.H., Han B.H., Park S.C.. 2021;Ecological characteristics and changes in plant community structure in Mt. Cheongryang, Incheon. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 49(2):74–88. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2021.49.2.074.
Lee W.B.. 2019;A flora of Mt. Chilbo in Gyeonggi-do. Korea Journal of Nature Conservation 18(1):113–139. https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2019.18.1.113.
Lim K.B.. 1994. A study on the development of new demand for utilization and silviculture in Robinia pseudoacacia Daejeon, Korea: Korea Forest Service.
Miller R.W.. 1988. Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspace Hoboke, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Myoung H.L., Choi Y.W., Yoon H.Y.. 2020;Locational factors influencing initial application rates for apartment sales : Hakse-kwon, yeokse-kwon, soopse-kwon and their respective proximity to educational institutes, subway station and green/open spaces as advertised in newspapers. Journal of Korea Planning Association 55(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.02.55.1.85.
National Academy of Agricultural Science. 2000. Analysis method soil and plants. Rural Development Administration Wanju, Korea: Author; Retrieved from http://www.naas.go.kr.
National Institute of Ecology. 2018. The 4th national ecosystem survey 2017: Vegetation: Hwaseong·Pyeongtaek Seocheon, Korea: Author; Retrieved from https://library.me.go.kr.
No T.H.. 2015. The eco-adaptive urban forest management methods of Namsan (Mt.) according to the urban environment change and management in Seoul, Korea. Doctoral dissertation Seoul National University; Seoul, Korea:
Oh K.K., Lee K.J., Yim K.B.. 1988;Vegetational management planning of the Namsan nature park in Seoul on the basis of phytosociological characteristics. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 77(1):1–9.
Oh K.S., Koo J.H., Cho C.G.. 2005;The effects of urban spatial elements on local air pollution. Journal of Korea Planning Association 40(3):159–170.
Oh K.Y., Choi S.H.. 1993;Vegetational structure and successional sere of warm temperate evergreen forest region, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 16(4):459–476.
Oke T.R.. 1997. Surface climate processes. In : Oke T.R., Bailey W.G., Rouse W.R., eds. Surface climates of Canada p. 21–43. McGill-Queen’s university press. Montreal:
Park B.C., Oh C.H., Cho C.W.. 2009;Community structure analysis of Carpinus laxiflora communities in Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(4):333–345.
Park E.H.. 2016. A study for analyzing successional stage and it’s characteristic of the black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) population: in case of the Korea capital region. Doctoral dissertation Dongguk University; Seoul, Korea:
Park I.H.. 1985. Forest structure, Biomass, and net production in a natural forest ecosystem at Mt. Baekun area. Doctoral dissertation Seoul National University; Seoul, Korea:
Park I.H., Lee K.J., Jo J.C.. 1993;Plot size for investigating forest community structure (1) -Adequate number of plots of tree stratum in a mixed deciduous forest community at Sobaeksan Area-. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 6(2):162–167.
Park S.G., Choi S.H., Lee S.C.. 2018;A review of vegetation succession in warm-temperate evergreen broad-leaved forests-Focusing on Actinodaphne lancifolia . Community-Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 32(1):77–96.
Pielou E.C.. 1975. Mathematical ecology N.Y: John Wiley and Sons.
Rai M.S.. 2017;Impact of Urbanization on Environment. International Journal on Emerging Technologies 8(1):127–129.
Ro Y.M., Kang H.J., Lee S.D.. 2015;Community analysis of urban forest around city of Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 29(4):599–604. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.4.599.
Russo A., Cirella G.T.. 2018;Modern compact cities: How much greenery do we need? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(10):2180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102180.
Sasaki T., Koyama A., Koyanagi T., Furukawa T., Uchida K.. 2015. Data analysis of plant community structure and diversity. Handbook of Methods in Ecological Research 3 Japan: Kyritsu Publishing.
Solomou A.D., Topalidou E.T., Germani R., Karetsos A.. 2019;Importance, utilization and health of urban forests: A review. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 47(1):10–16. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111316.
Song J.S., Kim H.Y., Kim J.S., Oh S.H., Cho H.J.. 2023;Vegetation classification and ecological characteristics of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations in Gyeongbuk province Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 112(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2023.112.1.11.
Strom S.. 2000. Urban and Community Forestry Planning and Design. In : Kuser J.E., ed. Handbook of Urban and Community Forestry in the Notrheast p. 77–84. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4191-2_6.
Suwon Environmental Movement Center. 1998. Mt. chilbo wetland ecosystem conservation and natural education site creation plan Suwon, Korea: Author; Retrieved from https://ecoarchive.org.
Ter Braak C.J.F.. 1986;Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67(5):1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938672.
Uttara S., Bhuvandas N., Aggarwal V.. 2012;Impacts of urbanization on environment. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences 2(2):1637–1645.
Vongpraseuth T., Choi C.G.. 2014;Commuting mode choices of new towns and mini new towns in the Seoul metropolitan area-Seongnam and Goyang city with Bundang and Ilsan new towns-. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 26(5):25–49.
Whittaker R.H.. 1956;Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecological Monographs 26(1):1–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943577.
Woo S.Y., Kim D.G., Lee D.S.. 2000;Effects of air pollution on physiological characteristics of Styrax japonica in Yeochon industrial complex. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 16(2):121–128.
World Health Organization. 2012. Health indicators of sustainable cities in the context of the Rio+20 UN conference on sustainable development Geneva: World Health Organization; Retrieved from https://www.who.int.
World Health Organization. 2017. Urban green spaces: a brief for action. World Health Organization Denmark, Europe: Regional Office for Europe; Retrieved from https://www.euro.who.int.
Yang J., Shi Q., Menenti M., Xie Y., Wu Z., Xu Y., Abbas S.. 2022;Characterizing the thermal effects of vegetation on urban surface temperature. Urban Climate 44:101204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101204.
Yeom S.J., Park C.I.. 2011;Satisfaction experienced in urban parks and green spaces according to their component and arrangement - A case study on tama newtown, Japan -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(5):12–20. https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2011.39.5.012.
Yi Y.K., Choi S.H.. 2000;Vegetation structure analysis of urban forest-The case of Namsan in Kyungju-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 28(3):13–24.
Yim K.B., Park I.H., Lee K.J.. 1980;Phytosociological changes of Pinus densiflora forest induced by insect damage in Kyonggi-do area. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 50(1):56–71.
Yun I.S., Song J.H., Byeon S.Y., Kim H.J., Lee J.E., Kim J.D., Yun C.W.. 2022;Community structure comparison of Fagaceae forest vegetation in Namsan, Odaesan, and Ulleungdo. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 111(4):511–529. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2022.111.4.511.
Zhang X., Faming S., Jie Y., Jian L., Jing L., Mei Y., Wen L.. 2021;Situation and treatment methods of ecological and environmental problems during the process of urbanization in rural areas of China. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 20(4):1781–1787. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i04.044.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The location map of study site and plant community survey plots in Mt. Chilbosan.

Fig. 2

The dendrogram of 80 plots classified by TWINSPAN classification.

Fig. 3

DCA ordination of 80 plots in Mt. Chilbosan (I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis).

Fig. 4

A CCA ordination diagram of vegetation communities respect to environmental variables in Mt. Chilbosan (■: Quercus mongolica, □: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, ▲: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, △: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., ♦ : Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, ⋄ : Robinia pseudoacacia, ●: Pinus koraiensis).

Table 1

General description of the physical environment and vegetation of the survey site

Community* I II III IV V VI VII
Altitude (m) 185.8 (141–226) 167.9 (140–226) 129.4 (82–195) 98.2 (64–156) 97.3 (74–120) 137.4 (79–160) 100
Aspect N10E, N30E, N62E, N24W, N40W, S40E, S70E N40W, N30E, N62E, N10E, N60W, N82E, S60W, N10W N45E, N80W, N10E, N10W, N18E, N80E, S22E, N55W S70W, N25W, S80E, N82E, N65W, N70E, N82W, S40E N22W, N80W, N82E, N50E, S80E S55W, S10E, N70E N33E
Slope (°) 31.1 (14–43) 25.8 (8–43) 27.2 (8–60) 14 (2–60) 20.4 (6–60) 17.2 (4–26) 17
Canopy Height (m) 15.3 (13–18) 15 (12–17) 15 (14–16) 16.8 (14–18) 16.9 (14–18) 15.8 (15–17) 13
Coverage (%) 69 (65–80) 71.8 (70–80) 73.6 (70–80) 76.7 (60–80) 78.2 (70–80) 72 (70–80) 90
DBH (cm) 18.7 (17–21) 20.7 (17–27) 22.1 (18–27) 24.3 (18–35) 27.4 (25–30) 23.4 (21–25) 18
Understory Height (m) 4.8 (3–8) 4.1 (3–8) 4.4 (3–6) 6.6 (3–10) 6 8 (6–10) 7
Coverage (%) 22 (10–30) 25 (10–50) 34.1 (15–50) 38.8 (10–50) 34.4 (20–50) 32 (30–40) 30
DBH (m) 4.6 (3–10) 3.8 (3–8) 4.5 (3–7) 6.4 (3–10) 5.4 (4–7) 11.6 (4–15) 6
Shrub Height (m) < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0
Coverage (%) 25 (10–40) 23.5 (10–50) 38.2 (10–70) 33.8 (10–70) 21.8 (10–30) 16 (10–20) 30
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis

Table 2

Importance percentage of major woody plants by the stratum in 7 communities Scientific Name

Scientific Name I II III IV




C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P
Corylus heterophylla - 0.8 0.6 0.4 - - 1.1 0.2 - 1.6 4.7 1.3 - 4.2 22.2 5.1
Toxicodendron trichocarpum - 1.7 1.8 0.9 - 3.8 1.7 1.6 - 6.2 6.4 3.1 - 3.4 2.5 1.6
Stephanandra incisa - - 7.5 1.2 - - 4.1 0.7 - - 4.3 0.7 - - 1.2 0.2
Juniperus rigida - 3.0 - 1.0 - 3.1 1.4 1.3 - 2.5 - 0.8 - - - -
Maackia amurensis - - - - - - - - - 3.7 - 1.2 - - - -
Styrax japonicus - 5.7 - 1.9 - - 0.5 0.1 - 1.8 1.8 0.9 - 3.7 3.6 1.8
Quercus dentata - 0.8 - 0.3 - - 0.6 0.1 - 1.0 3.6 0.9 - 1.51 1.6 2.4
Pinus rigida 14.7 - - 7.4 66.4 6.2 - 35.3 82.8 4.1 - 42.8 82.1 4.0 0.6 42.5
Castanea crenata - - - - 0.0 0.8 2.3 0.7 - 4.6 0.2 1.6 2.5 25.8 10.9 11.6
Prunus jamasakura 1.7 1.8 - 1.5 - 0.9 - 0.3 - 3.0 1.9 1.3 - 11.9 0.5 4.0
Quercus acutissima 2.0 0.8 - 1.3 - 0.4 - 0.1 1.6 - 1.1 1.0 9.6 2.9 0.1 5.8
Lindera obtusiloba - 1.6 6.3 1.6 - 0.5 0.6 0.3 - - 1.2 0.2 - - 0.1 -
Pinus densiflora 5.2 - 0.3 2.7 10.5 6.0 - 7.2 11.4 2.9 - 6.7 3.1 - - 1.6
Quercus mongolica 72.9 24.2 27.5 49.1 22.1 65.7 40.4 39.7 2.1 33.1 35.4 18.0 1.7 9.0 4.3 4.6
Robinia pseudoacacia 0.6 5.4 1.7 2.4 - 1.0 1.5 0.6 2.1 8.1 3.9 4.4 - 5.8 1.7 2.2
Magnolia obovata 0.6 1.6 0.3 0.9 - 0.9 0.8 0.4 - 0.5 0.4 0.2 - 3.7 1.2 1.4
Quercus serrata 0.8 4.4 2.3 2.2 - 0.9 10.2 2.0 - 14.0 10.5 6.4 1.1 17.2 13.8 8.6
Rhododendron mucronulatum - 0.9 34.6 6.1 - 0.4 22.1 3.8 - 0.8 13.3 2.5 - 0.8 8.3 1.7
Sorbus alnifolia 1.6 45.8 10.0 17.7 0.6 6.7 4.4 3.3 - 8.2 - 2.7 - 0.9 1.2 0.5

etc. (M.I.P < 1.0) Symplocos sawafutagi, Zanthoxylum schinifolium, Lespedeza bicolor, Smilax sieboldii, Smilax china Diospyros kaki, Quercus variabilis, Symplocos sawafutagi, Clerodendrum trichotomum, Cocculus trilobus, Alnus hirsuta, Weigela subsessilis, Zanthoxylum schinifolium, Callicarpa japonica, Spiraea prunifolia var. simpliciflora, Smilax china, Celtis sinensis Diospyros lotus, Quercus variabilis, Ilex serrata, Symplocos sawafutagi, Acer palmatum, Cocculus trilobus, Magnolia Kobus, Alnus hirsute, Zanthoxylum schinifolium, Callicarpa japonica, Smilax sieboldii, Smilax china, Pyrus calleryana var. fauriei, Euonymus alatus Diospyros kaki, Diospyros lotus, Quercus variabilis, Symplocos sawafutagi, Clerodendrum trichotomum, Acer palmatum, Cocculus trilobus, Magnolia Kobus, Alnus hirsute, Zanthoxylum schinifolium, Lespedeza bicolor, Smilax china, Pyrus calleryana var. fauriei, Celtis sinensis, Euonymus alatus
Scientific Name V VI VII



C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P C.I.P U.I.P S.I.P M.I.P
Forsythia koreana - - 13.2 2.2 - - - - - - - -
Corylus heterophylla - 2.7 7.4 2.2 - 14.3 28.4 9.5 - - - -
Toxicodendron trichocarpum - - 0.6 0.1 - - - - - 1.9 4.5 1.4
Stephanandra incisa - - - - - - - - - - 8.5 1.4
Quercus variabilis - 1.1 0.2 0.4 - - 2.1 0.4 - 3.1 - 1.0
Acer palmatum - 1.4 4.4 1.2 - - - - - - - -
Styrax japonicus 0.7 - - 0.4 - - - - - - 24.5 4.1
Pinus rigida 13.2 - - 6.6 - - - - 9.5 - - 4.7
Castanea crenata 43.5 59.9 35.9 47.7 6.8 5.8 2.4 5.7 9.6 9.7 25.4 12.3
Prunus jamasakura 12.6 8.1 2.8 9.5 - - - - - - - -
Quercus acutissima 25.1 4.2 - 14.0 3.1 2.2 1.2 2.5 - 5.7 - 1.9
Quercus mongolica - 2.3 2.1 1.1 12.6 13.8 - 10.9 - 35.5 34.3 17.5
Malus sieboldii - 1.3 3.6 1.0 - - - - - 2.1 - 0.7
Robinia pseudoacacia 2.1 1.1 0.5 1.5 69.6 40.3 22.3 52.0 4.0 14.2 - 6.7
Magnolia obovata 1.4 2.3 2.2 1.8 - 1.0 - 0.3 - - - -
Pinus koraiensis - - - - - - - - 77.0 - - 38.5
Spiraea prunifolia var. simpliciflora - - 8.1 1.4 - - - - - - - -
Quercus serrata - 10.0 6.4 4.4 6.2 19.1 2.0 9.8 - 10.9 - 3.6
Rubus oldhamii - - - - - - 12.2 2.0 - - - -
Rhododendron mucronulatum - - 5.8 1.0 - - 12.6 2.1 - - - -
Sorbus alnifolia - 0.5 - 0.2 - - - - - 16.9 - 5.7

etc. (M.I.P < 1.0) Ailanthus altissima, Quercus aliena, Diospyros kaki, Diospyros lotus, Symplocos sawafutagi, Clerodendrum trichotomum, Maackia amurensis, Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Lindera obtusiloba, Populus × tomentiglandulosa, Kalopanax septemlobus, Smilax sieboldii, Smilax china, Zanthoxylum piperitum Symplocos sawafutagi, Clerodendrum trichotomum, Quercus dentata, Magnolia Kobus, Elaeagnus umbellate, Lindera obtusiloba, Pinus densiflora, Populus × tomentiglandulosa, Rosa multiflora, Smilax sieboldii, Smilax china, Cornus controversa Zanthoxylum schinifolium
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis

Table 3

DBH distributions of major woody species by community (Units: cm)

Community* Scientific Name Shrub 0~7 7~12 12~17 17~22 22~27 27~32 32~37 37~42 42~47 47~52 52~57
I Quercus mongolica 248 13 8 26 22 11 2 3 - - - -
Pinus rigida - - 1 7 4 3 - - - - - -

II Quercus mongolica 551 68 14 13 18 11 2 3 - - 1 -
Pinus densiflora - - 4 9 10 3 - 2 - - - -
Pinus rigida - - 10 25 371 4 1 1 - - - 2

III Quercus mongolica 326 49 6 2 1 - 1 - 4 - - 1
Pinus densiflora - - 2 4 2 5 4 1 - - - -
Pinus rigida - - 6 36 26 17 9 - - - - 1

IV Castanea crenata 233 59 18 7 1 - 1 - - - - -
Quercus acutissima 4 7 2 4 9 8 4 1 - - - -
Quercus mongolica 121 37 3 1 - - - - 1 - - -
Quercus serrata 207 52 3 4 1 2 - - - - - -
Pinus rigida 2 1 9 31 49 34 17 5 5 1 - 2

V Castanea crenata 285 58 5 6 8 8 2 3 1 1 1 1
Prunus jamasakura 52 1 2 1 8 - - 1 - 1 - -
Quercus acutissima - - - 3 6 7 5 - - - - -

VI Quercus mongolica - 6 2 2 2 3 - - - - - -
Quercus serrata 16 6 3 1 - 3 - - - - - -
Robinia pseudoacacia 17 310 18 4 11 9 1 2 - - 1 -

VII Pinus koraiensis - - - 6 7 1 - - - - - -
Quercus mongolica 28 7 1 1 - - - - - - - -
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis

Table 4

Mean number of species, population, and diversity indices by community (Units: 100 m2)

Community* I II III IV V VI VII
Number of species 7.8 (4–11) 7.2 (3–12) 11.6 (8–21) 10.6 (5–16) 8.8 (5–14) 8.4 (6–12) 9.5 (9–10)

population Canopy 9.7 (6–14) 9.4 (5–17) 10.7 (4–21) 8.3 (3–21) 6.7 (3–11) 11.8 (7–21) 8.5 (8–9)
Understory 7.7 (0–15) 7.9 (2–21) 13.9 (5–24) 13.6 (2–23) 10.4 (0–35) 10.6 (2–17) 14.5 (7–22)
Shrub 71.2 (20–196) 70 (32–130) 91.7 (60–152) 80.6 (22–197) 87.8 (36–159) 107.2 (48–192) 38 (36–40)
Total 88.6 (27–221) 87.3 (52–150) 116.4 (81–172) 102.5 (40–227) 104.9 (45–168) 129.6 (70–221) 61 (52–70)

diversity indices H′ (shannon) 0.622 0.608 0.801 0.792 0.672 0.616 0.807
J′ (evenness) 0.704 0.708 0.763 0.788 0.716 0.671 0.826
D′ (dominance) 0.296 0.292 0.2370. 212 0.284 0.329 0.174
H′max 0.875 0.835 1.049 1.007 0.929 0.912 0.977
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis

Table 5

Similarity index among 7 communities

Community* I II III IV V VI
II 64.64 - - - - -
III 45.48 73.98 - - - -
IV 27.68 50.71 69.82 - - -
V 17.76 14.30 22.13 42.04 - -
VI 21.84 18.89 30.35 32.71 20.00 -
VII 38.25 31.62 39.66 32.79 26.90 29.24
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis

Table 6

Soil physicochemical properties by community

Community* pH EC (dS/m) OM (%) Ca2+ Mg2+ K+ Na+
cmol/kg
I 4.41 (4.27–4.79) 0.08 (0.05–0.11) 4.75 (0.88–10.28) 0.33 (0.13–0.77) 0.14 (0.04–0.37) 0.13 (0.07–0.18) 0.04 (0.03–0.07)
II 4.32 (4.00–4.96) 0.09 (0.05–0.14) 4.66 (0.88–8.57) 0.56 (0.13–1.99) 0.19 (0.04–0.64) 0.09 (0.06–0.14) 0.06 (0.04–0.12)
III 4.27 (4.06–4.96) 0.09 (0.05–0.12) 5.48 (1.97–9.80) 0.45 (0.18–0.83) 0.18 (0.07–0.33) 0.12 (0.08–0.17) 0.06 (0.03–0.11)
IV 4.45 (4.06–4.72) 0.08 (0.03–0.13) 3.76 (1.97–7.15) 0.46 (0.10–0.94) 0.19 (0.05–0.37) 0.15 (0.08–0.25) 0.06 (0.03–0.12)
V 4.57 (4.31–5.06) 0.08 (0.03–0.18) 3.34 (1.84–7.49) 0.44 (0.20–0.71) 0.21 (0.14–0.38) 0.19 (0.13–0.26) 0.05 (0.04–0.05)
VI 4.17 (4.05–4.42) 0.15 (0.05–0.21) 7.61 (2.93–9.73) 2.94 (0.19–5.89) 1.57 (0.10–3.37) 0.34 (0.15–0.45) 0.07 (0.03–0.08)
VII 4.36 0.07 7.69 0.50 0.26 0.15 0.04
*

I: Quercus mongolica, II: Quercus mongolica-Pinus rigida, III: Pinus rigida-Pinus densiflora, IV: Pinus rigida-Quercus spp., V: Castanea crenata-Quercus acutissima, VI: Robinia pseudoacacia, VII: Pinus koraiensis