Evaluating Public Service Experience in Ecological Institutions: A Structural Pathway Approach to Visitor Satisfaction at the Sejong National Arboretum

Article information

J. People Plants Environ. 2025;28(5):669-683
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 October 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2025.28.5.669
1Graduate Student, Department of Forestry, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
2Junior Manager, Arboretum Business Office, Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute, Sejong 30129, Republic of Korea
3Professor, School of Forest Sciences and Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author: HeeWon Kwon, heewon1838@naver.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0733-7216
First authorHeeWon Kwon, heewon1838@naver.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0733-7216
This study was carried out with the support of ‘R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (RS-2024-00404388)’ provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute).
Received 2025 July 28; Revised 2025 August 12; Accepted 2025 August 22.

Abstract

Background and objective

The green space services provided by public institutions serve not only as a means of providing space, but also as a medium of meeting public expectations and delivering social value. However, many existing public service evaluation frameworks focus solely on service quality, overlooking the cognitive structures and process-related factors that influence the formation of actual satisfaction. Against the backdrop, this study aimed to empirically analyze how the public service system of the Sejong National Arboretum, used as a case study, influences visitor satisfaction, with expectation-disconfirmation serving as a mediating factor.

Methods

An online survey was conducted among general visitors to the Sejong National Arboretum between June and October 2024, yielding a valid sample of 1,060 responses. The reliability and validity of the measurement model were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Discriminant validity was evaluated based on Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) criteria and by analyzing 95% confidence intervals of the correlation coefficients. Structural relationships among the variables were estimated using structural equation modeling (SEM), and the mediating effect of expectation-disconfirmation was tested through 5,000 bootstrap iterations.

Results

The structural equation model demonstrated a good overall fit, with goodness-of-fit indices of CFI = .967, TLI = .958, and RMSEA = .045. Visitors’ perception of social responsibility had a significant positive (+) effect on both expectation-disconfirmation (B = .920, p < .001) and satisfaction (B = .245, p < .001). The total effect, including both direct and indirect effects, was β = .890, indicating the strongest explanatory power among the variables. In contrast, employee service showed no significant effect on either expectation-disconfirmation (B = .010, p = .762) or satisfaction (B = −.004, p = .823), suggesting that it is not a key explanatory factor in the process of expectation formation and fulfillment. Expectation-disconfirmation functioned as a significant mediating variable in the relationship between social responsibility and satisfaction (B = .644, 95% CI = [.495, .793]), with approximately 72.4% of the total effect explained through the indirect path.

Conclusion

This study moved beyond traditional service quality-based evaluations to empirically investigate how the social value delivered by public institutions influences the formation of user expectations and overall satisfaction. In particular, through an analysis grounded in expectation-disconfirmation theory, the study found that cognitive alignment between the formation and fulfillment of expectations plays a more critical role in determining satisfaction than service quality alone. These findings underscore the need for future public service design to move beyond physical quality improvements and adopt strategies focused on policy value alignment, expectation management, and perceived quality.

Introduction

Recently, public expectations of public services have expanded beyond the mere provision of services to encompass a broader set of dimensions, including service quality, organizational social responsibility, and policy acceptance. However, many government-administered customer satisfaction surveys continue to focus predominantly on service quality, thereby failing to capture the multifaceted factors that shape users’ overall satisfaction (Bouckaert and Van de Walle, 2003). Consequently, public institutions are increasingly compelled to develop a more user-centered and multidimensional performance evaluation framework.

In particular, ecological and cultural public institutions—such as arboretums, museums, and natural recreation forests—serve a dual function: they offer experiences of the natural environment while simultaneously advancing policy objectives. These institutions act as vital intermediaries in delivering a wide range of public values, including education, culture, environmental conservation, and emotional well-being. However, evaluations of service quality in these institutions remain predominantly centered on quantitative operational metrics. There is a notable absence of an evaluation framework that holistically incorporates qualitative and psychological dimensions—such as citizens’ expectations, perceived experiences, and their perceptions of social value. These limitations adversely affect the attainment of the fundamental goals of public services—enhancing citizens’ perceived experiences and building trust. Public services are ultimately delivered to citizens through individual administrative agencies, and whether these agencies provide high-quality services and earn public trust is a critically important factor. Accordingly, it is essential to reconfigure and strengthen evaluation systems to better support these goals (Lee and Lee, 2009).

This further underscores the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks when viewed through the lens of service management theory, which emphasizes customer interaction and value co-creation (Grönroos, 2000; Lusch and Vargo, 2006). Osborne et al. (2013) also emphasized the need for a new diagnostic framework that redefines the essence of public service around experience and relationships, moving beyond traditional input-focused evaluation approaches. Against this backdrop, academic and policy interest in analyzing public services centered on “customer experience” is steadily growing.

This shift also aligns with citizens’ growing demand for public values that go beyond mere administrative efficiency. Public services are now expected to enhance quality of life and contribute to the realization of broader social value (Ko, 2018). Public services are increasingly expected to serve as instruments for improving citizens’ quality of life and advancing social value. This necessitates a comprehensive analysis encompassing service providers’ social responsibility, policy acceptance, and the fulfillment of customer expectations.

Service quality and expectation disconfirmation

Service quality refers to the customer’s overall perception of a service and is considered as a key factor in evaluating public service performance (Parasuraman et al., 1988; Zeithaml et al., 1996). In the public sector, where intangibility is particularly emphasized, citizens’ cognitive evaluations serve as the primary criterion for determining satisfaction, rather than physical performance. The concept of service quality originated from the disconfirmation paradigm, which was initially developed through research on product quality and customer satisfaction (Oliver, 1980). Grönroos (1982, 1984) proposed a theoretical framework suggesting that service quality is shaped by the comparison between expected and perceived service. He distinguished between “technical quality” (what is delivered) and “functional quality” (how it is delivered), emphasizing that the latter is more closely associated with customers’ subjective evaluations of their service experience.

This theoretical foundation was later systematized into the SERVQUAL model by Parasuraman et al. (1985, 1988), which identified five key dimensions for assessing customer perceptions of service quality: reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles. Since its development, the model has been widely applied across various service industries as a determinant of subsequent customer behaviors, including satisfaction, repeat usage, and recommendation (Cronin and Taylor, 1992; Brady and Cronin, 2001). In particular, Rust and Oliver (1994) proposed a three-dimensional framework that added the service environment to the existing dimensions of technical and functional quality, highlighting the complex cognitive components that shape the overall service experience.

Service quality is not merely a momentary evaluation; it plays a crucial role in fostering customer satisfaction and serves as the foundation for subsequent behaviors such as repeat usage/repurchase, positive word-of-mouth (WOM), and policy adoption. In the context of public services, users often place greater importance on publicness and reliability than on efficiency alone. Accordingly, “expectation disconfirmation”—a cognitive evaluation based on the gap between pre-use expectations and perceived service performance—emerges as a key mediating factor (Oliver and Bearden, 1983). Notably, research has shown that customers with stronger confidence in their expectations are more susceptible to the effects of negative disconfirmation (i.e., when performance falls short of expectations; Yi and Bak, 2020). Therefore, there is a growing recognition of the need to move beyond simple performance measurement and instead interpret customer satisfaction in terms of the formation and fulfillment of expectations as perceived by the customer.

Public customer satisfaction index (PCSI)

Today, the evaluation of public institution services is evolving beyond a focus on operational efficiency or satisfaction with civil complaint handling, toward a more comprehensive approach that encompasses the public’s perceived experience with policy implementation processes and their outcomes. In particular, the multi-layered nature of public services underscores the need to understand the process of customer satisfaction formation as a distinct structural framework from that of the private sector. In response to this need, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (2015) developed the Public Customer Satisfaction Index 2.0 (PCSI 2.0), a measurement framework tailored specifically for public institutions. The PCSI 2.0 quantifies the entire public service process through five core dimensions: service quality, social responsibility, expectation-disconfirmation (degree of expectation congruence), customer satisfaction, and perceived performance. This model was designed to enable a precise assessment of public institutions’ service performance from the customer’s perspective.

PCSI 2.0 seeks to move beyond simple evaluations at the service encounter level by structuring the cognitive and emotional judgment processes involved in public service experiences—from the formation of customer expectations to the evaluation of experiences and final perceptions. Whereas the existing CSI and PCSI 1.0 primarily focused on measuring static satisfaction levels based on service quality, PCSI 2.0 incorporates a more complex framework that accounts for the contextual nature of public service delivery and the potential for realizing public value. Customer satisfaction and service performance serve as outcome variables that holistically capture the entire evaluative process. Going beyond mere customer satisfaction, these variables help explain the diffusion pathways of policy effects—such as policy acceptance, institutional trust, and the formation of public beliefs. In conclusion, PCSI 2.0 is an integrated evaluation framework for analyzing the causal structure of public services—from expected service levels and perceived quality to value recognition and acceptance of policy outcomes. It offers a valuable foundation not only for building practical feedback systems, but also for advancing theoretical understanding of public services and improving policy performance management.

Research objectives and hypotheses

This study aimed to empirically analyze the causal pathways shaping customer satisfaction through the experience of using public institutions, utilizing the PCSI 2.0 model. Specifically, we focused on the structural relationship between service quality and perceptions of social responsibility, both of which influence customer expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction. Accordingly, we proposed a set of research hypotheses and developed the corresponding conceptual model (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Research model.

In particular, based on the expectation-disconfirmation theory (Oliver, 1980), which has been widely discussed in the literature, we conceptually positioned expectation-disconfirmation as a key mediating variable affecting customer satisfaction. Furthermore, rather than positing a single a priori hypothesis regarding whether expectation-disconfirmation serves as a full or partial mediator, we sought to empirically identify the structural form of the mediating effect by statistically testing the significance of both direct and indirect effects through structural equation modeling (SEM). This approach represents an analytical strategy grounded in prior theoretical research and empirically uncovered the actual functioning of the mediating pathway.

  • H1: Service quality has a positive (+) effect on customer satisfaction.

  • H2: Service quality has a positive (+) effect on expectation-disconfirmation.

  • H3: Social responsibility has a positive (+) effect on customer satisfaction.

  • H4: Social responsibility has a positive (+) effect on expectation-disconfirmation.

  • H5: Expectation-disconfirmation has a positive (+) effect on customer satisfaction.

  • H6: Expectation-disconfirmation mediates the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction.

  • H7: Expectation-disconfirmation mediates the relationship between social responsibility and customer satisfaction.

Research Methods

Site description

The Sejong National Arboretum is the first urban national arboretum in South Korea. Situated within Sejong Central Park, it encompasses an area of 65 hectares (649,997 m2) and was inaugurated in October 2020. The arboretum functions as a sustainable green infrastructure within the urban environment, with primary objectives including the systematic conservation of both domestic and international plant species, ecological education, research, and the promotion of a garden culture grounded in citizen participation.

Key facilities consist of a four-season greenhouse, a traditional Korean garden, and various themed gardens. Beyond exhibiting seasonal vegetation and landscape displays, the arboretum provides experiential learning opportunities through plant education programs, ecological interpretation, and community engagement initiatives. These multifaceted functions establish the arboretum as a public ecological and cultural space that integrates environmental education with cultural enrichment, rather than serving solely as a passive viewing site.

From a policy perspective, the Sejong National Arboretum functions as key infrastructure of both balanced national development and sustainable urban creation. Sejong City, conceived as a multifunctional administrative capital, has emphasized ecological values and the preservation of green spaces as core principles since its inception. Within this context, the arboretum has been positioned as key infrastructure for conserving urban ecosystems and addressing climate change.

Its operations are managed by the Korea Arboreta and Garden Institute (KOAGI), under the jurisdiction of the Korea Forest Service, which employs a public institution management model that prioritizes the public good over profitability. Consequently, the arboretum attracts a diverse range of visitors, including the general public, educators, researchers, students, and ecological civic organizations. These visitor demographics provide a valuable foundation for empirically analyzing visitor satisfaction and assessing the effectiveness of related policies based on user purposes and expectations.

Survey design

This study conducted an online survey over a period of approximately five months, from June 1 to October 31, 2024, to empirically analyze visitor satisfaction with public services at the Sejong National Arboretum. The target population consisted of general visitors to the arboretum. To ensure accessibility and ease of participation, the survey was administered in a non-face-to-face format using QR codes. Informational banners were strategically placed at key points along the exhibition route to encourage voluntary participation. Duplicate responses based on IP addresses and insincere or incomplete responses were excluded, resulting in a valid sample of 1,060 cases.

The survey items were developed based on the PCSI 2.0 model proposed by the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF, formerly the Ministry of Strategy and Finance) in 2015. Items were formulated according to the operational definitions of key concepts, and responses were measured using an 11-point Likert scale (0 = Strongly Disagree, 10 = Strongly Agree). The measurement items were categorized into four variables, as summarized in Table 1.

Survey items for visitor satisfaction at the National Sejong Arboretum

Service quality is a concept perceived through the gap between customer expectations and the actual services received. It plays an even more crucial role in the context of public services, which are inherently intangible and consumed as they are delivered (Yoo et al., 2019). In this study, service quality is defined as “the extent to which an institution’s customer satisfaction management activities influence overall satisfaction.” It was measured through multi-dimensional items, including satisfaction with exhibition content, clarity of information delivery, comfort of the physical environment, and the convenience of institutional processes.

Social responsibility can be defined as “an institution’s responsibility for the impact of its decision-making and activities on society and the environment through transparent and ethical behavior” (Kim and Lee, 2012). It is considered a key criterion for evaluating the publicness and sustainability of public institutions. This construct was used as an indicator to measure the extent to which the Sejong National Arboretum fulfills its role in delivering public benefits and consists of items such as user interest in the arboretum, raising awareness of biological resources and the perceived public benefits.

Expectation-disconfirmation refers to the cognitive process of evaluating the gap between pre-service expectations and the actual experience, playing a crucial role in shaping customer satisfaction (Oliver, 1997). This variable was conceptualized as “the degree to which the actual experience met prior expectations.” It was designed to encompass both instances where expectations were met and where they were surpassed. Specifically, it includes three items: satisfaction relative to expectations, satisfaction relative to an ideal standard, and satisfaction relative to services offered by other organizations, thereby allowing for a multifaceted measurement of cognitive discrepancies.

Satisfaction is a psychological evaluation resulting from the interplay between customers’ emotional responses and their prior expectations during service consumption. It is closely linked to customer loyalty and subsequent behavioral intentions. The measurement focused on the overall satisfaction experienced by visitors to the Sejong National Arboretum and comprised three items: overall satisfaction, willingness to revisit, and willingness to recommend. This construct not only captures simple emotional responses but also encompasses the potential to induce behavioral intentions, grounded in the rationale behind the independent satisfaction factors proposed by Geva and Goldman (1991).

Analytical strategy

This study employed SEM to examine the structural relationships among factors influencing public service satisfaction among visitors to the Sejong National Arboretum. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 and Amos 29.0, following a systematic procedure.

First, frequency and descriptive statistical analyses were performed to identify respondents’ demographic characteristics—such as gender, age, and place of residence—and to ensure the representativeness of the sample. Reliability analysis was conducted using Cronbach’s α coefficient to assess the internal consistency of each variable.

Next, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out to evaluate the measurement validity of the research model. CFA is a statistical technique used to test whether the theoretically established structure between latent and observed variables are supported by the actual data. In this study, model fit was assessed using a range of goodness-of-fit indices, including the chi-square (χ2) statistic, comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). In general, a model is considered to have an acceptable fit when the CFI and TLI values are .90 or higher, the RMSEA is below .08, and the SRMR is below .10 (Hu and Bentler, 1999). Based on the results of the CFA, this study comprehensively examined both convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was evaluated using three criteria: standardized factor loadings of .50 or higher, average variance extracted (AVE) of .50 or higher, and construct reliability (CR) of .70 or higher (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988). Discriminant validity was assessed using two approaches. First, following the criteria proposed by Fornell and Larcker (1981), discriminant validity was deemed to be established if the square root of the AVE for each latent variable exceeded the correlation coefficients between that latent variable and all other variables (AVE > ϕ2). Second, if the 95% confidence interval of the correlation coefficient between any two variables did not include 1 (i.e., ϕ ± 2 × S.E.), the two constructs were considered to be statistically distinct. Through this multifaceted assessment, the measurement model in this study demonstrated sufficient discriminant validity among the theoretical constructs.

Finally, the causal relationships among latent variables were comprehensively evaluated through SEM. This study formulated the hypothesis that service quality and social responsibility affect customer satisfaction via the mediating role of expectation-disconfirmation, and subsequently examined the significance of individual paths and the underlying causal structure. The direct, indirect, and total effects among the variables were estimated, and the statistical significance of the mediating effects was specifically tested using 5,000 bootstrap iterations. A mediating effect was considered statistically significant if the corresponding confidence interval did not include zero (Preacher et al., 2007). These analytical procedures were undertaken to comprehensively assess the measurement validity and causal explanatory power of the proposed model, thereby providing both theoretical and practical implications.

Results

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

In terms of demographic characteristics, a majority of respondents were female, with individuals in their 30s and 40s comprising the largest age groups. Survey participants were evenly distributed across Sejong, Daejeon, the Chungcheong region, and the Seoul metropolitan area in terms of their place of residence, thereby ensuring regional representativeness (see Table 2).

Demographic characteristics

Descriptive statistical analysis of the key variables (see Table 3) indicated that all measurement items had mean scores above 8.5 and standard deviations below 2.0, suggesting a generally high level of satisfaction and consistency in responses. To assess the normality of the variables, skewness and kurtosis were examined. All values satisfied the criteria proposed by Kline (2023)—absolute skewness less than 3 and absolute kurtosis less than 10—supporting the assumption of normality. Pearson correlation analysis (see Table 4) revealed that the correlation between expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction was the strongest, with a coefficient of r = .860 (p < .01). Significant positive correlations were also found between satisfaction and social responsibility (r = .738), as well as service quality (r = .713).

Descriptive statistics

Correlation analysis

The reliability of each construct was confirmed through Cronbach’s α coefficients, all of which exceeded the threshold of .70, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Specifically, product quality (α = .810), delivery quality (α = .955), environmental quality (α = .796), social responsibility (α = .866), expectation-disconfirmation (α = .917), and satisfaction (α = .911) all demonstrated high reliability.

Measurement model evaluation

A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the measurement model. The analysis was performed within the framework of a structural equation model, evaluating whether each measurement item adequately represented its corresponding latent variable.

Initial CFA results revealed that certain items exhibited factor loadings below the acceptable threshold or lacked conceptual alignment, leading to a revision of the model. In particular, among the subdimensions of service quality, the three items related to “customer interaction” (SQ4–SQ6) demonstrated a distinct conceptual consistency from the other items and were therefore restructured into a separate subdimension labeled “Employee Service” (see Fig. 2). This revision was grounded in the theoretical and empirical validity that employee service can function as an independent factor determining user satisfaction. Specifically, previous research has consistently highlighted employee behavior as a critical factor in shaping customer perceptions of service (Henning-Thurau, 2004; Wall and Berry, 2007; Baker et al., 2013). This importance is especially pronounced in the service industry, where the nature of employee-customer interactions plays a pivotal role. (Chien-Wen et al., 2013). These prior findings thus offer a strong conceptual and empirical rationale for reorganizing the “customer interaction-related” items into a separate construct (Alhelalat et al., 2017).

Fig. 2

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised measurement model.

The revised measurement model demonstrated excellent overall fit, as evidenced by the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ2 = 363.146, df = 48, CMIN/df = 7.566, TLI = .966, CFI = .975, RMSEA = .079, and SRMR = .028. Notably, the TLI and CFI both surpassed the .95 threshold, and the RMSEA and SRMR fell below the recommended cutoffs of .08 and .03, respectively, providing further evidence of a strong model fit (Hu and Bentler, 1999).

Convergent validity of the measurement items was assessed through standardized factor loadings, average variance extracted (AVE), and construct reliability (CR). All factor loadings were .70 or higher, AVE values exceeded .50, and CR values were above .70—meeting the criteria recommended by Bagozzi and Yi (1988), Fornell and Larcker (1981), and Woo (2022). All items demonstrated standardized factor loadings of .70 or higher, with AVE values exceeding .50 and CR values above .70, thus satisfying the criteria recommended by Bagozzi and Yi (1988), Fornell and Larcker (1981), and Woo (2022). These findings provide evidence of consistent item responsiveness and strong measurement reliability within each construct.

Discriminant validity was assessed based on two criteria proposed by Fornell and Larcker (1981). First, discriminant validity is considered to be established when the square root of the AVE for each latent variable exceeds the correlation coefficient between that variable and all other variables (AVE > ϕ2). As shown in Table 5, this criterion was satisfied for most variable pairs. However, for the pair of expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction, the square root of the AVE was smaller than their correlation co-efficient, indicating a failure to meet this criterion. Second, discriminant validity is also supported when the 95% confidence interval of the correlation coefficient between two latent variables does not include 1 (ϕ ± 2 × S.E.) (see Table 6). In this case, the confidence interval for the correlation coefficient between expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction (r = .944) was [.780, 1.108], which includes 1, thus failing to meet this second criterion as well.

Discriminant validity results based on Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion (AVE > ϕ2)

Discriminant validity results based on correlation confidence intervals (ϕ ± 2 × S.E.)

These results appears to reflect the strong theoretical relevance between the two constructs. Previous studies (Oliver, 1980; Bearden and Jesse, 1983) have also emphasized that discrepancies between expectations and actual experiences are key pathways to satisfaction and that expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction are inherently related concepts with closely aligned cognitive structures. Accordingly, the high correlation and structural similarity observed between these two variables are theoretically justifiable and do not fundamentally undermine the overall validity of the measurement model.

In conclusion, while the measurement model did not fully satisfy the discriminant validity criteria for certain variable pairs—particularly between expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction—this is considered acceptable in light of the theoretical consistency with existing theoretical backgrounds. Overall, considering the goodness-of-fit indices, convergent validity, reliability, and other indicators, the measurement model in this study is deemed sufficiently reliable and valid for use in structural model analysis.

Structural model and hypothesis testing

An evaluation of the theoretical model established through SEM (see Fig. 3) indicated that the model demonstrated a statistically acceptable fit across the majority of fit indices: χ2 = 363.146, df = 48, CMIN/df = 7.566, TLI = .966, CFI = .975, RMSEA = .079, and SRMR = .028. This suggests that the model is consistent with the collected data, thereby providing a solid analytical foundation for hypothesis testing (see Table 7).

Fig. 3

Structural model path diagram.

Structural model fit results

To assess the significance of each path, a bootstrapping procedure with 5,000 iterations was conducted (Table 8). The analysis revealed that employee service had no significant effect on either expectation-disconfirmation (B = .010, p > .05) or satisfaction (B = −.004, p > .05). Accordingly, Hypotheses H1 and H2 were not supported. In contrast, social responsibility exhibited a significant positive (+) effect on both expectation-disconfirmation (B = .920, p < .001) and satisfaction (B = .245, p < .001), supporting Hypotheses H3 and H4. Additionally, Hypothesis H5 was supported, indicating that expectation-disconfirmation has a significant effect on customer satisfaction (B = .700, p < .001).

Results of structural equation modeling: Path coefficients and effect decomposition

An analysis of the indirect effects revealed that social responsibility significantly influenced satisfaction through the mediation of expectation-disconfirmation (B = .644, 95% CI [.495, .793]), confirming that expectation-disconfirmation plays a key mediating role in the relationship between these variables. In contrast, the path from employee service to satisfaction via expectation-disconfirmation was not statistically significant (B = .007, 95% CI [−.066, .080]), indicating that the indirect effect through expectation-disconfirmation was not supported.

Further analysis of the total effects showed that social responsibility exerted both a significant direct effect (B = .245) and an indirect effect (B = .644) on satisfaction, resulting in a total effect of B = .890 (p < .001). The indirect effect comprised approximately 72.4% of the total, indicating that the formation and fulfillment of expectations constitute a key pathway in the development of satisfaction. Moreover, a closer examination of the items comprising each latent variable revealed that, within the social responsibility construct, “the institution’s provision of public benefits” emerged as the most influential item in determining customer satisfaction. Within the expectation-disconfirmation construct, the item “satisfaction relative to services provided by other institutions” emerged as a key determinant in the formation of expectations. This empirically indicates that visitors assess their experiences not based on the absolute level of service, but rather on the relative performance of public institutions in serving the public good.

These findings can be interpreted as empirical support for the validity of Expectation-Disconfirmation Theory (Oliver, 1980) within the context of public service. Specifically, the path appears to effectively function as follows: when customers recognize the social responsibility initiatives of public institutions, their expectations are adjusted accordingly. If subsequent service experiences align with these expectations, they result in heightened satisfaction. This underscores that the formation and confirmation of expectations serve as fundamental evaluative criteria in public service experiences. In contrast, employee service, as an independent variable, did not have a significant direct or indirect effect on satisfaction. This suggests that customer-facing services may be more strongly influenced by emotional responses or situational conditions than by rational evaluation. Accordingly, employee service in public institutions is more likely to exert its effect through interaction with other factors rather than as an independent factor.

Taken together, the SEM conducted in this study empirically demonstrates that the social responsibility of public institutions significantly influences the formation of public satisfaction, mediated by the processes of expectation formation and fulfillment. This finding suggests that delivering strategic value that reflects public values—beyond merely improving service quality—is a crucial mechanism for enhancing public satisfaction.

Discussion

This study empirically analyzed the causal structure underlying satisfaction with public services based on a survey of visitors to the Sejong National Arboretum. The SEM revealed that employee service had no statistically significant effect on either expectations or satisfaction. However, perceptions of social responsibility had a strong positive (+) effect on both expectation-disconfirmation and satisfaction, with expectation-disconfirmation serving as a critical mediating pathway to satisfaction.

These findings diverge somewhat from the emphasis placed on service quality in the existing literature. For instance, Parasuraman et al. (1988) and Zeithaml et al. (1996) suggested service quality as a key determinant in the formation and fulfillment of customer expectations. Similarly, Grönroos (1982, 1984) highlighted the functional attributes of the service delivery process as a key criterion to elucidating the cognitive gap between expectations and actual experiences. Based on these theoretical perspectives, this study initially hypothesized that employee service would significantly affect expectations and satisfaction. However, the empirical results suggested that visitors’ perceptions of social responsibility actually functions as a variable that more strongly explains the coordination mechanism between expectation formation and confirmation.

Above all, this study is significant in that it moves beyond merely examining the direct effects among variables, instead focusing on the structural form of mediating pathways centered on expectation-disconfirmation. While the expectation-disconfirmation theory (Oliver, 1980) emphasizes the gap between prior expectations and actual experiences as a key determinant of customer satisfaction, this study extends the application of the theory to the public service context. Specifically, it empirically investigates which independent variables contribute to the mediating structure through expectation-disconfirmation in shaping satisfaction.

The analysis revealed that visitors’ perceptions of social responsibility exerted both significant direct and indirect effects on satisfaction, forming a partial mediation structure. Notably, approximately 72.4% of the total effect was transmitted through the indirect pathway. In contrast, neither the direct nor indirect effects of employee service on satisfaction were statistically significant, indicating that a mediating structure was not established in this case. This indicates that expectation-disconfirmation does not function as a universal mechanism that operates uniformly across all independent variables. Rather, its operation appears to be contingent upon the specific characteristics and contextual relevance of each factor.

These findings suggest that satisfaction with public services is more profoundly affected by structural and macro-level factors—such as social accountability and perceptions of publicness—than by factors like customer interaction quality or the physical environment. Notably, by identifying that the cognitive structure between expectation formation and fulfillment functions as a central pathway in the formation of satisfaction, this study provides a theoretical foundation for extending the existing expectation-disconfirmation theory—originally developed for consumer goods and private services—to the public service sector.

Future research should engage in a deeper theoretical investigation into the preconditions and moderating variables under which expectation-disconfirmation exerts its mediating effects. For example, it is necessary to develop sophisticated models to investigate how cognitive factors —such as organizational trust, policy acceptance, and public institution image—interact within the expectation-fulfillment structure. Moreover, since emotion-based factors— such as employee service—are more likely to be assessed indirectly through their interaction with perceptions of the organization and contextual variables, rather than functioning as independent determinants, future studies should incorporate a multivariate approach that accounts for emotional responses and impression formation processes.

Conclusion

Today, customer satisfaction with public services can no longer be assessed solely based on operational efficiency or service quality. In particular, the perceived quality of public facilities—especially those rooted in nature and the environment—are shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including citizens’ emotional sensitivity, ecological awareness, and trust in public institutions. The Sejong National Arboretum, a multifaceted public space that integrates sightseeing, education, and participation, exemplifies this multidimensional criterion.

This study empirically examined the causal structure of public service satisfaction by applying the PCSI 2.0 model and SEM to survey data collected from visitors to the Sejong National Arboretum. The analysis revealed that simple, interaction-focused employee service had no significant effect on expectation formation or overall satisfaction. In contrast, visitors’ perceptions of social responsibility exhibited a strong positive affect on both expectation-disconfirmation and final satisfaction. Notably, 72.4% of the total effect was mediated through expectation-dis-confirmation. These findings suggest that customer satisfaction is shaped more by perceptions of a public institution’s social role and the process of expectation fulfillment than by the quality of service alone.

In particular, “the perception that a public institution provides public benefits” was found to have a strong effect on overall satisfaction, while “satisfaction relative to services offered by other institutions” emerged as a key factor in generating expectation-disconfirmation. These findings suggest that citizens evaluate their experiences not merely based on absolute service quality, but on the extent to which an institution fulfills its public mission. Therefore, public institutions should adopt strategic communication approaches that move beyond a customer-centric framework to clearly articulate their organizational identity and commitment to social responsibility.

The results demonstrate the applicability of expectation-disconfirmation theory (Oliver, 1980) to the public service domain, showing that analyzing the process of expectation formation and fulfillment as a mediating mechanism—rather than relying on a single satisfaction metric—enables more accurate performance evaluation. Most notably, by empirically validating the cognitive structure linking expectations, fulfillment, and satisfaction, this study underscores the importance of strategic practices that integrate policy messaging, expectation management, and the cultivation of public trust.

Furthermore, this study quantitatively validated the pathway linking social responsibility, expectation-disconfirmation, and satisfaction by applying SEM to the PCSI 2.0. This suggests the potential for theoretical expansion from an academic perspective. From a practical perspective, this study empirically demonstrates the link between the formation of customer expectations and perceived quality, thereby supporting the role of policy communication and customer experience management as key variables in enhancing public service performance. Notably, by confirming the structural connection between the realization of social value and the public’s tangible experience, this study offers a practical foundation for narrowing the gap between policy objectives and public perception.

Nonetheless, this study has some theoretical and methodological limitations that suggest directions for future research.

First, while service quality was measured as a single dimension based on theoretical grounds, public services in practice are inherently multidimensional—encompassing factors such as employee interactions, the physical environment, and the quality of service content. Future studies could adopt a more refined analysis by categorizing these sub-dimensions and examining the relative influence of each construct. Moreover, beyond social responsibility, it is necessary to comprehensively consider additional determinants of satisfaction specific to public institutions, such as organizational trust and policy acceptance

Second, as this study employed a single mediation model centered on expectation-disconfirmation, it did not fully capture the psychological pathways underlying satisfaction or the complex interplay of factors influencing behavioral responses—such as policy trust, perceived value, emotional reactions, and revisit intentions. Future research could enhance the practical implications of public service experiences by incorporating these variables into an expanded structural model.

Third, using a self-report survey may limit the consistency and objectivity of the responses. Additionally, since the analysis was confined to a single institution, the generalizability of the findings may be restricted. Future studies should consider supplementing evaluations with expert group assessments and conducting comparative analyses across multiple public institutions to improve measurement reliability and external validity.

Despite these limitations, this study is significant in that it empirically validates an evaluation approach that goes beyond quantitative satisfaction metrics, emphasizing the causal structure of expectation formation and fulfillment in the context of public institution performance design.

References

Alhelalat J.A., Ma’moun A.H., Twaissi N.M.. 2017;The impact of personal and functional aspects of restaurant employee service behaviour on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management 66:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.07.001.
Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y.. 1988;On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16:74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
Baker M., Murrmann S.K., Green C.. 2013;Dining in the city: Server behaviors, time preferences, and the effect of urbanization in restaurants. Journal of Foodservice Business Research 16(2):113–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2013.761042.
Bearden W., Jesse E.. 1983;Selected deterninants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. Journal of marketing research :20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151408.
Bouckaert G., Van de Walle S.. 2003;Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences 69(3):329–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693003.
Brady M.K., Cronin J.J. Jr. 2001;Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing 65(3):34–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.34.18334.
Chien-Wen T., Hsiu-Li H., Jo-Ping L., Mei-Shiue L., Chen-Hui W.. 2013;The relationships among employee personality traits, service attitude, and service behavior in the leisure farm. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management 1(2):75–88. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2169/2013.11.003.
Cronin J.J. Jr, Taylor S.A.. 1992;Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of marketing 56(3):55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600304.
Fornell C., Larcker D.F.. 1981;Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1):39–50.
Geva A., Goldman A.. 1991;Satisfaction measurement in guided tours. Annals of tourism Research 18(2):177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(91)90002-S.
Grönroos C.. 1982;An applied service marketing theory. European Journal of Marketing 16(7):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004859.
Grönroos C.. 1984;A service quality model and its marketing implications. European journal of marketing 18(4):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784.
Grönroos C.. 2000;Creating a relationship dialogue: communication, interaction and value. The Marketing Review 1(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347002523428.
Hennig-Thurau T.. 2004;Customer orientation of service employees: Its impact on customer satisfaction, commitment, and retention. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15(5):460–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230410564939.
Hu L.T., Bentler P.M.. 1999;Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Kim C.J., Lee S.Y.. 2012;Strengthening the social responsibility of public institutions-Focusing on the Korea Racing Authority. Social Enterprise and Policy Studies 2(1):41–80.
Kline R.B.. 2023. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling Guilford publications.
Ko M.C.. 2018;The Effects of Public Service Satisfaction on Subjective Well-being: Focusing on the moderated mediation effect of community QoL by Trust in Local Government. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies 22(2):119–146. http://doi.org/10.20484/klog.22.2.6.
Lee J.P., Lee S.K.. 2009;Newly Developed Quality Evaluation Model on Public Service. Korean Public Management Review 23(1):1–32. http://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2009.23.1.001.
Lusch R.F., Vargo S.L.. 2006;Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory 6(3):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066781.
Oliver R.L.. 1980;A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research 17(4):460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405.
Oliver R.L., Bearden W.O.. 1983;The role of involvement in satisfaction processes. Advances in consumer research 10(1)
Oliver R.L.. 1997. Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer: A behavioral perspective on the consumer New York: McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700892.
Osborne S.P., Radnor Z., Nasi G.. 2013;A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration 43(2):135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935.
Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L.. 1985;A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing 49(4):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403.
Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L.. 1988;Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1):12.
Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F.. 2007;Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42(1):185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316.
Rust R.T., Oliver R.L.. 1994. Service quality: insights and managerial implications from the frontier. Service quality: New directions in theory and practice p. 1–20. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229102.n1.
Wall E.A., Berry L.L.. 2007;The combined effects of the physical environment and employee behavior on customer perception of restaurant service quality. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 48(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010880406297246.
Woo J.P.. 2022. Professor Woo Jong-Pil’s concept and understanding of structural equation modeling Hannarae Publishing Co.
Yi Y.J., Bak H.A.. 2020;A comprehensive review of customer satisfaction, service quality and customer participation behavior. Journal of Consumer Studies 31(5):49–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.35736/JCS.31.5.3.
Yoo H.J., Kim Y.S., Jung U., Park M.J.. 2019. The origin of customer satisfaction and sustainable growth: Quality management Saengneung Publishing Co.
Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L., Parasuraman A.. 1996;The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing 60(2):31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Research model.

Fig. 2

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised measurement model.

Fig. 3

Structural model path diagram.

Table 1

Survey items for visitor satisfaction at the National Sejong Arboretum

Category Item
Service Quality Product Quality SQ1. The exhibitions at the arboretum were suitable for viewing.
SQ2. I was able to fully enjoy the exhibitions at my own pace.
SQ3. The content of the exhibitions was consistent with the theme and was clearly conveyed to me.

Delivery Quality SQ4. The staff at the arboretum were attentive to visitors’ opinions.
SQ5. Communication with the staff at the arboretum was clear and effective.
SQ6. The staff at the arboretum understood my perspective and did their best to assist me.

Environmental Quality SQ7. The exhibition facilities and environment were pleasant and comfortable.
SQ8. The process for visiting the arboretum (e.g., purchasing tickets, making group reservations) was convenient.
SQ9. Overall, the staff at the arboretum were highly competent in customer service.

Social Responsibility SR1. Visiting the arboretum increased my interest in the arboretum itself.
SR2. Visiting the arboretum enhanced my awareness of the importance (and diversity) of forest biological resources.
SR3. The Korea Arboreta and Garden Institute (KOAGI) provides public benefits to citizens through arboretum visits.

Expectation-Disconfirmation ED1. The arboretum visit exceeded my expectations.
ED2. Compared to the “ideal arboretum,” the exhibitions at the arboretum were satisfying.
ED3. The exhibitions at this arboretum were more satisfying than those at other institutions I have previously visited.

Satisfaction CS1. Overall, I was satisfied with the exhibition experience.
CS2. I am willing to visit the Sejong National Arboretum again.
CS3. I am willing to recommend the Sejong National Arboretum to others.

Table 2

Demographic characteristics

Category Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Gender Male 355 33.5
Female 705 66.5

Age 10 and under 4 .4
10–19 62 5.8
20–29 155 14.6
30–39 364 34.3
40–49 281 26.5
50–59 141 13.3
60–69 47 4.4
70 and above 6 .6

Residential Area Seoul 104 9.8
Busan 16 1.5
Daegu 26 2.5
Incheon 12 1.1
Gwangju 14 1.3
Daejeon 162 15.3
Ulsan 6 .6
Sejong 257 24.2
Gyeonggi Province 97 9.2
Gangwon Province 12 1.1
Chungcheongnam-do 126 11.9
Chungcheongbuk-do 128 12.1
Jeollanam-do 8 .8
Jeollabuk-do 57 5.4
Gyeongsangnam-do 9 .8
Gyeongsangbuk-do 25 2.4
Jeju 1 .1
Others 0 .0

Total 1,060 100.0

Table 3

Descriptive statistics

Category Measurement Variable Mean Standard Deviation Skewness Kurtosis
Service Quality Product Quality SQ1 8.60 1.485 −1.408 3.053
SQ2 8.78 1.553 −1.745 4.156
SQ3 8.55 1.481 −1.440 3.165

Delivery Quality SQ4 8.60 1.673 −1.771 4.469
SQ5 8.61 1.690 −1.809 4.611
SQ6 8.63 1.692 −1.860 4.781

Environmental Quality SQ7 8.87 1.483 −2.046 6.169
SQ8 9.00 1.454 −2.330 7.964
SQ9 8.69 1.644 −1.957 5.388

Social Responsibility SR1 8.95 1.444 −2.052 6.014
SR2 8.89 1.440 −1.743 4.087
SR3 8.93 1.434 −1.997 5.847

Expectation-Disconfirmation ED1 8.88 1.587 −2.143 6.326
ED2 8.58 1.638 −1.680 3.695
ED3 8.61 1.713 −1.933 4.865

Satisfaction CS1 8.89 1.394 −1.892 5.510
CS2 8.97 1.575 −2.352 7.361
CS3 9.00 1.501 −2.266 6.918

Table 4

Correlation analysis

Variable Service Quality Social Responsibility Expectation-Disconfirmation Satisfaction
Service Quality 1
Social Responsibility .774** 1
Expectation-Disconfirmation .698** .722** 1
Satisfaction .713** .738** .860** 1

Table 5

Discriminant validity results based on Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion (AVE > ϕ2)

Variable Inter-variable Correlation

Employee Service Social Responsibility Expectation-Disconfirmation Satisfaction
Employee Service .876
Social Responsibility .529 .682
Expectation-Disconfirmation .343 .637 .791
Satisfaction .371 .699 .891 .771

Table 6

Discriminant validity results based on correlation confidence intervals (ϕ ± 2 × S.E.)

Variable Correlation coefficient 2S.E. CI
Employee Service ↔ Social Responsibility .727 .160 .567 ~ .887
Employee Service↔ Expectation-Disconfirmation .586 .166 .420 ~ .752
Employee Service↔ Satisfaction .609 .152 .457 ~ .761
Social Responsibility↔ Expectation-Disconfirmation .798 .150 .648 ~ .948
Social Responsibility↔ Satisfaction .836 .138 .698 ~ .974
Expectation-Disconfirmation↔ Satisfaction .944 .164 .780 ~ 1.108

Table 7

Structural model fit results

x2 df CM IN/df TLI CFI RMSEA SRMR
363.146 48 7.566 .966 .975 .079 .028

Table 8

Results of structural equation modeling: Path coefficients and effect decomposition

Path B β S.E. C.R p Direct Effect Indirect Effect Total Effect
Employee Service → Expectation-Disconfirmation .010 .011 .033 .303 .762 .010 - .010
Social Responsibility→ Expectation-Disconfirmation .920*** .790 .053 17.441 .000 .920 - .90
Employee Service→ Satisfaction −.004 −.006 .020 −.223 .823 −.004 .007 .003
Social Responsibility→ Satisfaction .245*** .230 .042 5.796 .000 .245 .644 .890
Expectation-Disconfirmation→ Satisfaction .700 .764 .032 21.578 .000 .700 - .700