Horticultural Characteristics of 69 Herbaceous Medicinal Plants as Plant Resources for Agro-Healing Applications

Article information

J. People Plants Environ. 2025;28(4):477-492
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 August 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2025.28.4.477
1Doctoral student, Department of Horticulture, The Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu 38430, Republic of Korea
2Professor, Department of Horticulture, The Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu 38430, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author: SukYoung Yun, yune1004@cu.ac.kr, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-0021
First authorSeRa Oh, srohoh22@naver.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8798-1191
Received 2025 April 18; Revised 2025 May 21; Accepted 2025 August 4.

Abstract

Background and objective

Agro-healing (also known as care farming or social farming), which utilizes agricultural resources, has gained attention since the enactment of the Agro-Healing Act in 2021. Medicinal plants, traditionally used for the prevention and treatment of diseases, have strong potential as resources for agro-healing programs. However, systematic data on suitable plant resources remain limited. This study aimed to identify herbaceous medicinal plants and analyze their horticultural characteristics to assess their suitability for agro-healing applications.

Methods

Among the 761 medicinal plants authorized by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (as of May 2024), 69 herbaceous species were selected after excluding those with low applicability. The selection was based on criteria including availability, plant type, and growth characteristics. The selected plants were analyzed in terms of life form, family, flowering season, flower color, harvesting season, sowing season, and edible parts.

Results

The majority of the selected species were perennial herbs (74%), predominantly from the Asteraceae and Lamiaceae families. Flowering and harvesting seasons were mainly in summer and autumn. The most common flower colors were white (29%) and yellow (27%). Leaves were the most frequently consumed edible parts, accounting for 28%.

Conclusion

These findings provide practical criteria for selecting medicinal plants for use in agro-healing programs and suggest directions for future research, including expanded applications and interdisciplinary integration.

Introduction

In South Korea, agro-healing—also referred to as care farming, social farming, green care, or farming for health—began to garner attention as an integrated approach to health recovery and promotion, particularly following the implementation of the Act on Research, Development, and Promotion of Healing Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the “Agro-Healing Act”) in March 2021. Furthermore, interest in agro-healing continues to grow as it emerges as a practical alternative for preventing and addressing various social issues. Agro-healing content involves agricultural tasks or activities that are intentionally designed using agricultural and rural resources to achieve specific therapeutic goals for participants (Article 2 of the Agro-Healing Act). This approach extends beyond simple farming activities, offering a wide range of values and experiences—such as emotional well-being, ecological education, and recreational opportunities (Hong et al., 2024). In other words, agro-healing refers to “agricultural activities that promote healing.” It leverages diverse agricultural resources, including plants and animals, to deliver structured programs aimed at therapy, rehabilitation, education, and social services (Jung et al., 2016; Park et al., 2017). These programs encompass various forms of agricultural activity-based interventions, including as horticultural therapy, forest therapy, animal-assisted therapy, natural healing, wilderness therapy, and ecotherapy, all of which utilize agricultural or rural resources (Di Iacovo and O’Connor, 2009; Haubenhofer et al., 2010; Park et al., 2017).

Medicinal plants, among the various plant resources available for agro-healing, have traditionally been used for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Their alignment with the goals of agro-healing—namely, health recovery and disease prevention—makes them highly promising as plant materials in such programs (Kwak et al., 2011). Historically, the cultivation of medicinal plants was primarily focused on maximizing yield and generating income (Chang et al., 2014). However, with the recent rise of wellness culture and growing public interest in healthy foods, medicinal plants are gaining renewed attention. Media coverage of medicinal herbs has become increasingly frequent, often causing specific herb names to trend in real-time search results. Additionally, many local governments are promoting medicinal plants as regional specialty crops. In particular, the increasing popularity of modern Korean cuisine, which incorporates traditional Korean elements, has further highlighted the value of medicinal herbs. These plants are being rediscovered as culinary ingredients that effectively convey Korean characteristics (Kim and Lee, 2020). This suggests that medicinal plants are more than mere agricultural products—they hold significant potential as valuable plant resources with diverse horticultural traits and as food resources in agro-healing programs.

However, systematic research on the horticultural characteristics of plant resources necessary for the field application and practical operation of agro-healing programs remains insufficient. Existing studies have largely focused on evaluating the effectiveness of agro-healing programs, with limited in-depth analysis or discussion regarding the specific horticultural traits of the plant resources involved. In practice, the medicinal plants used in agro-healing programs in South Korea tend to be repetitive, with a few species—such as bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.), and ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey.) cultivated for two years—being used frequently. This narrow selection limits both the diversity of resources and the discovery of new plant candidates. While some previous studies have presented lists of plant resources potentially applicable to agro-healing, they often lack systematic analyses explaining why certain plants are appropriate or what specific horticultural characteristics make them suitable. Particularly, plant resources used in agro-healing programs should be selected based on a comprehensive evaluation of practical factors relevant to field application. These include accessibility for participants, ease of observing plant growth, seasonal growth cycles, and the convenience of cultivation and management.

Therefore, this study aimed to identify medicinal plant resources suitable for use in agro-healing programs and to systematically analyze their horticultural characteristics—such as life form, flowering season, sowing period, and edible parts—in order to provide practical baseline data that can enhance field applicability and operational efficiency. Unlike conventional agricultural approaches, which primarily focuses on productivity, this study distinguishes itself by establishing clear horticultural criteria tailored to the goals of agro-healing and providing a foundation for the development of targeted and customized agro-healing programs.

Research Methods

In this study, a total of 761 species were selected for analysis. These included 552 species approved (or registered) as traditional Korean medicines (crude drugs) by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS) as of May 2024, as well as 209 species approved (or registered) solely as medicinal herbs. Plant species used in agro-healing programs are typically selected based on criteria such as accessibility for participants, ease of growth observation, seasonal growth cycles, and adaptability to cultivation environments. Herbaceous plants, which generally meet these criteria, are considered more suitable for the goals and implementation of agro-healing programs. Although the use of established woody plants is feasible in certain settings—such as agro-healing farms (also referred to as care farms, therapeutic farms, or social farms)—this study focused on agro-healing programs that begin with seed sowing. Therefore, herbaceous plants were deemed more appropriate. To identify suitable herbaceous plants, plant groups with low applicability were excluded from the analysis. The exclusion criteria are as follows (Table 1). Among the 761 species, the largest proportion (307 species, 45%) were excluded due to difficulties in seed procurement. This was followed by 165 woody and shrub species (24%), 88 species of marine plants and fauna (13%), 44 processed medicinal plants (6%), and 26 minerals and fossils (4%). Additionally, 53 species (8%) classified as fungi, parasitic plants, spore-bearing plants (cryptogams), vegetatively propagated plants, resinous plants, and other categories were also excluded from the analysis.

Exclusion criteria and status for selecting medicinal plants applicable to Agro-healing programs

Each plant was analyzed for its life form, family name, edible and medicinal parts, flowering season, flower color, harvesting season, and sowing season. The results are summarized in Table 2. The classification criteria were established based on authoritative sources, including the APG IV system, the National Standard Plant List, the Medicinal Plant Names Services (MPNS), the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM)’s Herbal Medicine Resources Research, the Society of Korean Medicine (SKOM)’s Standard Korean Medicine Terminology 2.1, the Herbal Medicine Standard Resources Research, Biodiversity of the Korean Peninsula, the Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Applying these criteria, 683 species were excluded, resulting in a final selection of 69 medicinal plant species deemed suitable for field application in agro-healing programs.

Botanical and horticultural characteristics of selected medicinal plants

Life form

The selected medicinal plants were classified as either annual or perennial species. Herbaceous annuals complete their life cycle—from germination through flowering, fruiting, and death—within a single year. During unfavorable periods, such as winter or drought, they persist only as seeds. Since they do not naturally re-sprout in the same location the following year, seed collection and replanting are essential for their cultivation. However, they offer the advantage of flowering in the same year they germinate (Korea Forest Service, 2024). Herbaceous perennials, by contrast, live for multiple years. They are defined as “grasses that live for three or more consecutive years; while the aboveground parts die back in winter, the underground organs remain alive,” enabling new shoots to emerge the following spring (Yang, 2018).

Herbaceous annuals can be effectively used in agro-healing programs, enabling participants to clearly observe and directly engage with the processes of growth, flowering, and fruiting within a relatively short period. Horticultural therapy programs, for example, have been reported to encompass activities spanning all stages of plant growth—from soil preparation and seedling planting to watering, thinning, weeding, and harvesting (Oh and Heo, 2021). In contrast, herbaceous perennials, with their extended growth cycles, provide high management efficiency and maintain seasonal continuity, making them particularly valuable for long-term agro-healing programs. In this study, we took into account the characteristics of both life forms to identify plant resources well suited for agro-healing applications.

Family Name

The family names of the selected plants were identified based on the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV, 2016) classification system and the National Standard Plant List, which together encompass 64 orders and 522 families. Plants within the same family are taxonomically closely related and are likely to share similar morphological and physiological traits, as well as cultivation requirements. Therefore, classifying and understanding plants by family can serve as an effective and systematic approach for plant cultivation and management in agro-healing programs. Furthermore, selecting plants based on taxonomic similarity is expected to enhance management efficiency and provide more practical support for program implementation.

Flowering Season

The flowering season was investigated based on meteorological seasons. Over the past 100 years (1912–2020), Korea has experienced significant changes in the duration of its seasons. Notably, during the most recent 30-year period (1991–2020), summer became the longest season, lasting 118 days, while winter became the shortest, lasting only 87 days. Compared to the earlier period (1912–1940), this represents a 20-day increase in summer and a 22-day decrease in winter. Additionally, the onset of spring and summer has shifted earlier by an average of 17 and 11 days, respectively, while the onset of fall and winter has been delayed by about 9 and 5 days, respectively. Reflecting these climate change trends, this study redefined the seasonal periods as follows: spring (March–April), summer (May–September), fall (October–November), and winter (December–February; Korean Meteorological Administration, 2025). The flowering season of plants is a key factor in determining the operational plans and scheduling of agro-healing programs. In particular, considering the possibility that participants may observe blooming flowers or engage in emotional and aesthetic activities related to flowers, it was deemed more effective to align the flowering season of plants with the operational schedule of the program.

Flower Color

In agro-healing, flower color serves as a representative visual element appreciated by people. While flowers exhibit a wide range of colors, the human visual system can perceive only a limited spectrum, including red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and purple (Bova, 2004; Majetic et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2023). Colors carry powerful energies that help restore mental and physical balance and stimulate the patient’s inner self, thereby supporting the healing process. Moreover, color influences emotions and physical behaviors, making it an effective tool in treating stress-related conditions. Since each color absorbs different amounts of energy, it has been reported to have beneficial effects even on individuals with visual impairments who cannot perceive colors directly (Yun and Jeon, 2021). In this study, Munsell’s Color System—based on five primary hues: red (R), yellow (Y), green (G), blue (B), and purple (P)—was adopted as the framework for classifying the flower colors of medicinal plants. Munsell’s system was designed to create a balanced and systematic approach to color classification by defining color attributes in terms of hue, value, and chroma, and by emphasizing visual uniformity to clearly distinguish different levels of these attributes (Kuehni, 2002; Minm 2025). Based on this, our study performed a simplified qualitative grouping to enhance visual clarity and analytical efficiency, resulting in a classification system comprising ten distinct color groups.

Harvesting Season

The content of medicinal properties in medicinal plants varies depending on their growth stage. After being cultivated in suitable environments, they are harvested when these properties are at their peak (Kim et al., 2019). However, there is still insufficient standardization regarding the optimal harvesting timing and utilization methods. In actual cultivation settings, cultivation and harvesting often depend on empirical knowledge or local traditions. In this regard, this study conducted a literature review to organize the harvesting seasons of representative medicinal plants, categorized by the specific parts used for medicinal purposes. The seasonal classification of harvesting times was based on previously established criteria for flowering season. Previous research has shown that harvesting is the most favored activity among participants in agro-healing programs focused on horticulture (Jeong et al., 2021). Therefore, this study aimed to support the development of more systematic and practical program operations by aligning harvesting schedules with program planning.

Sowing Season

The sowing season was established with reference to commercially available medicinal plant seed cultivation guides and actual cultivation practices used by farmers. Practical sowing information was compiled by synthesizing various sources, including literature materials (e.g., manuals from the Rural Development Administration), agricultural technology data, and commercial cultivation guidelines (e.g., provided by seed companies). The seasonal classification of sowing season followed the same methodology used for categorizing flowering seasons. The sowing season serves a fundamental factor to scheduling activities in agro-healing programs, where participants are directly involved in planting and managing plants. Setting an appropriate sowing season enhances seed germination rates and early plant growth, enabling participants to more easily observe plant development and changes. Furthermore, effectively planning of the sowing season contributes to the smooth execution of program activities aligned with different plant growth stages, thereby promoting participant engagement and sustained involvement.

Edible Parts

The use of medicinal plants not only as medicine but also as food ingredients is a cultural practice observed globally. In East Asian cultures, concepts such as sik-chi (healing through appropriate food; food therapy), yak-sik-dong-won (medicine and food share the same origin), and yak-seon (medicinal cuisine) highlight the medicinal value of edible ingredients and imply the integration of medicinal plants into daily diets (Kim and Lee, 2020). To assess the potential of each medicinal plant as a food ingredient, this study utilized data from the Food Ingredients Database available through the Korea Food Safety Portal operated by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Plant parts listed as “applicable” in the “Eligibility for Food Ingredients” section of the database indicate their legal approval for use as food ingredients and were therefore selected for this study. When specific restrictions or conditions of use were indicated, these were categorized separately as “Ingredients for Limited Food Use.” Based on this classification, the edible parts of each medicinal plant were further categorized into roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, and whole plants (i.e., the entire aboveground portion). Previous studies have suggested food therapy activities—such as processing or cooking crops that participants have grown and harvested themselves—as representative components of indoor agro-healing programs (Oh and Heo, 2021). Consistent with these findings, this study considered that clearly identifying the edible parts of medicinal plants would support the planning of food-related activities during program implementation and enhance participant safety by providing accurate information on edibility.

Results and Discussion

A survey of medicinal plants currently used in Korean agro-healing programs revealed the following characteristics. Wild Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum L.) and bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.) are utilized in agro-healing programs for retirees operated by the Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services. Two-year-old ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey.) is included in agro-healing manuals designed for patients suffering from hemiplegia following a stroke. Moreover, the Level 2 Agro-healing Specialist Training Guide published by the Rural Development Administration (RDA, 2021) recommends the use of licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC.), Korean angelica (Angelica gigas Nakai), bonnet bellflower (Codonopsis lanceolata (Siebold and Zucc.) Benth. and Hook.f. ex Trautv.), bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.), Solomon’s seal (Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce var. pluriflorum (Miq.) Ohwi), Chinese yam (Dioscorea polystachya Turcz.), lilyturf (Liriope muscari (Decne.) L.H. Bailey), and Indian wormwood (Artemisia indica Willd.). The manual on agro-healing and urban farming, along with functional data on horticultural specialty crops published by the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, includes the following medicinal plants: bell-flower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.), bonnet bellflower (Codonopsis lanceolata (Siebold and Zucc.) Benth. and Hook.f. ex Trautv.), ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), bupleurum (Bupleurum komarovianum Lincz.), Schisandra (Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill.), gromwell (Lithospermum murasaki Siebold), milk vetch (Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bunge), and Siberian ginseng (Eleutherococcus sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.) S.Y. Hu). Representative medicinal plants commonly used in Korean folk remedies and considered highly relevant to this study include licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC.), Korean mint (Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze), luffa (Luffa cylindrica (L.) M. Roem.), and Mongolian dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.)

As mentioned earlier, an analysis of major medicinal plants referenced in existing sources revealed that 13 species, accounting for 19% of the 69 plants selected for this study, were commonly included. These species are: licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC.), bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.), ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey.), lilyturf (Liriope muscari (Decne.) L.H. Bailey), Solomon’s seal (Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce var. pluriflorum (Miq.) Ohwi), Indian wormwood (Artemisia indica Willd.), Korean angelica (Angelica gigas Nakai), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), bupleurum (Bupleurum komarovianum Lincz.), gromwell (Lithospermum murasaki Siebold), Korean mint (Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze), luffa (Luffa cylindrica (L.) M. Roem.), and Mongolian dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz). In particular, bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC) and licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC.) were frequently cited in most agro-healing-related materials, indicating that they are among the most commonly preferred medicinal plants in agro-healing programs. In contrast, several plants newly identified in this study—such as sicklepod (Senna tora (L.) Roxb.), selfheal (Prunella vulgaris L. subsp. asiatica (Nakai) H. Hara), and rock pine (Orostachys japonica (Maxim.) A. Berger)—were relatively less frequently mentioned in existing agro-healing materials, suggesting their strong potential as novel agro-healing resources. These comparative analysis results indicate that the list of medicinal plants compiled in this study not only reflects the key species already utilized in agro-healing practices, but also introduces a diverse range of underutilized plants, thereby potentially broadening the scope of agro-healing resources.

Life form

Among the 69 selected medicinal plants classified by life form, 16 species (23%) were herbaceous annuals, 51 species (74%) were herbaceous perennials, and 2 species (3%) were annual or biennial herbs. This indicates a relatively high prevalence of herbaceous perennials among medicinal plants suitable for agro-healing programs. herbaceous perennials, which continue to grow for several years without the need for reseeding, are more efficient to manage and offer advantages in maintaining seasonal continuity compared to herbaceous annuals. Lee (2015) emphasized the importance of long-term engagement in plant cultivation, stating that “when first starting to grow plants, other activities that provide immediate gratification should be excluded and long-term efforts should be devoted to cultivation.” Lee argued that this cultivation process can have positive emotional effects. Given their ecological characteristics, herbaceous perennials grow in the same location over extended periods. This continuity in both time and space can be considered a structural factor that contributes to the development of emotional stability in program participants by offering a stable and consistent form of environmental stimulation. Therefore, when selecting plant species for such programs, their ecological characteristics should be considered in alignment with the programs’ duration and objectives. A study by Jang et al. (2010) reported that horticultural therapy programs with a greater number of sessions tended to demonstrate higher effectiveness. These findings support the notion that herbaceous perennials, which can be maintained and utilized over extended periods, are suitable and effective materials for agro-healing programs. Specifically, the perennial herbs suggested in this study include root-based medicinal herbs such as Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC., Panax ginseng C.A. Mey., and Astragalus penduliflorus Lam. var. dahuricus (DC.) X.Y. Zhu. Representative examples also include species primarily used for their leaves or whole above-ground parts, such as Mentha arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes and Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze (Table 2). In particular, root-based medicinal herbs such as Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC and Panax ginseng C.A. Mey. exhibit relatively slow initial growth but are characterized by stable and sustained growth over time. In contrast, leafy and herbaceous perennials like Mentha arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes and Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze produce new leaves and stems each year, offering participants clear and repeated opportunities to observe plant growth and seasonal changes. The specific characteristics of the medicinal plants listed in Table 2 highlight the importance of designing and operating agro-healing programs with a long-term perspective, particularly through the incorporation of herbaceous perennials.

Family Name

Classification of the selected medicinal plants according to the family-level taxonomy of the APG IV (2016) system resulted in a total of 32 families. Among these, Asteraceae represented the largest proportion, comprising 12 species (16%), followed by Lamiaceae with 10 species (14%). Other families that also showed relatively high frequencies included Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae, each represented by 4 species (6%). This pattern is consistent with previous studies on herbal genetic resources in South Korea. A total of 206 species belonging to 37 families of herbal resources were collected in South Korea, with Lamiaceae (32%) and Asteraceae (19.4%) together accounting for more than half of the total (Park et al., 2019). These findings suggest a tendency toward the preferential use of certain plant families in the composition of medicinal plants utilized in agro-healing. This aligns with the high representation of these two families in the selection of plant species for agro-healing programs. Furthermore, members of the Asteraceae family are commonly consumed as savory vegetables and constitute a significant part of the Korean diet (Choi, 2016). Species such as Aster yomena (Kitam.) Honda, Dendranthema zawadskii (Herbich) Tzvelev var. latiloba (Maxim.) Kitam., Carthamus tinctorius L., and Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz. are rich in flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones, which have been reported to exhibit a range of physiological activities, including antibacterial, anticancer, anti- inflammatory, and antioxidant effects (Son, 2020). The Lamiaceae family is known to be widely used not only as ornamental plants but also as edible delicacies and flavoring agents, as the entire plant body is covered with glandular hairs that emit a distinctive aroma (Song et al., 2002). Therefore, the frequent use of plants from these two families in agro-healing programs (Table 2) may reflect their physiological activities and functional properties.

Flowering Season

The majority of medicinal plants used in agro-healing programs were found to flower in summer, accounting for 62 species (88%), followed by 8 species (12%) that flower in spring. Notably, no species were identified that flower in autumn or winter. These results indicate that a significant proportion of medicinal plants utilized in agro-healing programs bloom during the summer. For agro-healing programs focused on horticultural activities, the use of summer- flowering plants may facilitate visual and olfactory stimulation through their vibrant colors, diverse shapes, and fragrances. The groundcover species most commonly used by horticultural therapy professionals bloomed relatively evenly throughout the year, with 57 species flowering in spring, 52 in summer, 30 in fall, and 24 in winter (Kim et al., 2024). However, these findings are not consistent with those of this study. This discrepancy is likely attributable not only to the selection of plant materials in this study—chosen for their functional properties, such as physiological activity—but also to the concentration of program implementation in the summer, when plant growth and flowering are particularly active. Table 2 lists specific summer-flowering plants, including pot marigold (Calendula arvensis L.), cockscomb (Celosia argentea L. var. cristata (L.) Kuntze), Korean mint (Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze), and corn mint (Mentha arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes). It also includes spring-flowering species such as Mongolian dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.) and violet (Viola mandshurica W. Becker). The seasonal concentration aligned with the blooming period is expected to enhance program efficiency and stimulate greater interest and participation during the corresponding seasons. However, since the plants used in this study primarily bloom in spring and summer, related activities may be limited in the fall and winter. Therefore, future research should consider the full range of seasonal flowering periods and explore additional plant resources suitable for use in the fall and winter, thereby increasing both the diversity and continuity of agro-healing programs.

Flower Color

The plant resources used in this study were categorized into ten color groups. Among them, white-flowered species represented the largest proportion, with 25 species (29%). This was followed by yellow (23 species, 27%), red (14 species, 16%), and purple (13 species, 15%). Purple-blue (PB) accounted for three species (4%), while red-purple (RP) and green-yellow (GY) each included two species (2%). Yellow-red (YR), blue (B), and green (G) were the least represented, with one species each, comprising 1% of the total. As shown in Table 2, representative species in the white category include Mongolian snake-gourd (Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim.), Korean chrysanthemum (Dendranthema zawadskii (Herbich) Tzvelev var. latiloba (Maxim.) Kitam.), and coastal hogfennel (Peucedanum japonicum Thunb.). The yellow category includes evening primrose (Oenothera biennis L.) and pot marigold (Calendula arvensis L.). A survey of 266 people revealed that women showed the strongest preference for white and yellow cut flowers (Hong, 2005). Hyun (2017) cited the study by Lee et al. (2005), which reported a high level of public preference for yellow cut flowers. These results suggest that the high frequency of white and yellow flowers observed in this study may be advantageous in selecting plant species that reflect the participants’ preferences. Furthermore, Seo and Lee (2013) and Ahn (2015) suggested that the process of recognizing and expressing personal emotions and feelings through color imagery serves a psychological function that promotes self-understanding. The psychological experience of color affects all aspects of the human body, emotions, and cognition. Consequently, it is considered to play a significant role in supporting both mental and physical health, facilitating recovery, and promoting the integration of mind and body. Color is a visual experience and a sensory function of light that cannot be perceived through other senses such as touch, taste, smell, or hearing. However, color perception does not always occur at a conscious level; instead, it is processed within the mind (Holtzschue, 2015; Kim, 2024). Therefore, the floral color characteristics of medicinal plants identified in this study are expected to maximize the emotional effects on participants through visual stimulation in the implementation of future agro-healing programs.

Harvesting Season

A high proportion of medicinal plants were harvested in fall (44 species, 46%) and summer (38 species, 40%). Other plants were harvested in spring (10 species, 10%), winter (3 species, 3%), and throughout all four seasons (1%). Multiple responses were included, as some species could be harvested in more than one season. As shown in Table 2, representative medicinal plants harvested in fall include Korean angelica (Angelica gigas Nakai) and Oriental chaff flower (Achyranthes bidentata Blume var. japonica Miq.), while those harvested in summer include roseroot (Orostachys japonica (Maxim.) A. Berger) and motherwort (Leonurus japonicus Houtt.). These results indicate that the harvesting of medicinal plants is concentrated primarily in summer and fall. This suggests the need for a strategically timed plant acquisition plan and activity schedule that reflect these seasonal harvesting patterns when implementing a healing agriculture program. In particular, designing the program around plant-based materials that are available in summer and fall is expected to enable operation that fully leverages seasonal characteristics. In addition, it has been reported that the medicinal properties and physiological activities of medicinal plants may vary depending on the harvesting season (Kim et al., 2016). Therefore, further research on seasonal variations in these properties and physiological activities, based on the findings of this study, is expected to provide clearer insights into the potential of medicinal plants as agro-healing materials.

Sowing Season

Spring accounted for the highest proportion of sowing seasons, with 54 species (55%), followed by fall (22 species, 22%), summer (14 species, 14%), all seasons (6 species, 6%), and winter (2 species, 2%). Medicinal crops are typically sown or transplanted in spring (RDA, 2018), and this study likewise found that the greatest number of species were sown in spring. As shown in Table 2, representative spring-sown plants include garden balsam (Impatiens balsamina L.), blackberry lily (Iris domestica (L.) Goldblatt and Mabb.), and safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Owen (1994) noted that the act of sowing seeds symbolizes a new beginning and hope, while the subsequent growth process represents opportunities for achievement and change. This suggests that, when selecting medicinal plants with consideration of the sowing season, both the growth cycle and the symbolic meanings of the plants may positively affect participants (Lee et al., 2024).

Edible Parts

Leaves accounted for the largest proportion of edible parts, with 32 species (28%), followed by seeds and young shoots (12 species each, 11%), roots (11 species, 10%), inedible parts (10 species, 9%), and conditionally edible parts (9 species, 8%). A variety of other plant parts were also included, such as stems (4 species, 4%), fruits (5 species, 4%), flowers (3 species, 3%), and sprouts (3 species, 3%). As shown in Table 2, representative medicinal plants with edible leaves include Korean mint (Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze), British elecampane (Inula japonica Thunb.), and Bupleurum (Bupleurum komarovianum Lincz.). Plants with edible seeds include brown mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) and safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). The leaves and roots of these plants are utilized for culinary and medicinal purposes, respectively, and they possess the advantage of being adaptable to diverse forms of processing and application within agro-healing programs. Oh and Heo (2021) noted that modern individuals, accustomed to various convenience foods such as instant meals, may experience healing by engaging with rural cuisine that incorporates fresh produce harvested from vegetable gardens, as well as traditional Korean fermented foods and sauces. This suggests not only the potential of medicinal plants as agro-healing resources, but also their strong applicability in the development of practical food culture programs rooted in the concept of sik-chi, or food therapy—such as medicinal cooking, herbal tea preparation, and seasonal culinary experiences. The specific potential for utilizing medicinal plants with diverse edible parts appears to be closely associated with the therapeutic activity of experiencing rural cuisine, as reported in previous studies.

Conclusion

This study identified 69 medicinal plant species suitable for field implementation in agro-healing programs. Their horticultural characteristics—including life form, family name, flowering season, flower color, harvesting season, sowing season, and edible parts—were analyzed to identify and categorize appropriate resources for agro-healing activities. The analysis revealed a predominance of perennial herbs, with the Asteraceae and Lamiaceae families being particularly well-represented. Flowering and harvesting seasons were mainly concentrated in summer and fall. White and yellow were the most common flower colors, and the edible parts varied widely, encompassing roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits.

While social and academic interest in agro-healing continues to grow, there remains a lack of systematic information on plant resources necessary for practical implementation. Therefore, this study is significant in that it analyzes the horticultural characteristics of medicinal plants to provide foundational data that can be applied to the operation of actual agro-healing programs. Notably, by moving beyond the conventional productivity-oriented perspective and instead focusing on key plant traits—such as life form, flowering season, and edible parts—relevant to actual program use, this study is expected to provide a practical basis for the development of targeted and customized agro-healing programs. Among the 21 categories of plant use identified in North Korean folk plant studies, medicinal plants were the second most frequently cited after edible plants, indicating a high level of interest in and utilization of medicinal species (Lee et al., 2024). These findings lend further support to the selection criteria and practical applicability of medicinal plants in agro-healing programs as proposed in this study, underscoring their significance as valuable resources for agro-healing interventions.

However, this study is limited in that it focused exclusively on herbaceous plants, thereby excluding a broader range of potential agro-healing resources, including woody species. Woody plants were excluded from this study, as they did not meet the selection criteria due to several practical challenges associated with their field application—namely, the relative difficulty of management and growth monitoring, slower growth rates, and spatial limitations for cultivation. To address this limitation, future research should consider developing distinct selection criteria and evaluation systems tailored specifically to woody plants. This may include the establishment of new horticultural indicators—such as growth characteristics, management practices (e.g., pruning, cuttings, grafting, and seedling management), and long-term growth patterns. This would enable a more objective and systematic assessment of the practical feasibility and field applicability of agro-healing programs that incorporate woody plant species.

Furthermore, RDA (2018) recommended that agro-healing resources directly cultivated and managed by program participants should not be used for food or medicinal purposes. It proposed that agro-healing specialists carefully design the entire experience—from cultivation and harvesting to cooking and consumption—so that it may be effectively delivered as part of an agro-healing service. Accordingly, the horticultural characteristics of medicinal plants analyzed in this study may serve as foundational data for program development. However, the processes of harvesting and utilizing these plants should be carefully planned from an ethical perspective to ensure that they do not negatively affect the diverse therapeutic benefits for participants.

Therefore, further research should aim to develop customized programs utilizing the medicinal plants presented in this study, empirically verify the effectiveness of agro-healing programs, and explore practical applications in food culture programs—such as medicinal cuisine, beverage development, and seasonal cooking programs incorporating the concept of sik-chi (food therapy). Through these efforts, it is essential to broaden the scope of agro-healing resource utilization and to continuously enhance their value as practical foundational data capable of addressing diverse field needs.

References

Ahn S. H.. 2015. The effects of group art therapy using color psychology on ego-identity and emotional intelligence of university students. Master’s thesis Myongji University; Seoul, Korea:
Chang K. J., Kwak J. S., Seong H. G.. 2014. Practical Cultivation of Medicinal Herbs Seoul, Korea:
Choi M., Cho T., Suh J. K.. 2010;Research analysis of the therapeutic factors in the contact with plant and nature in horticultural therapy. Journal of Environmental Science International 19(4):517–525. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.4.517.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2025. April. 13. Medicines Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en.
Hong I. K., Moon J. W., Lee S. M.. 2024;Searching for operation standards program through analysis trends in agro-healing for 5 years (2018~2022). Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University 58(2):21–32.
Hyun S. Y.. 2017. Survey on the flower color preference by varieties of the cut flower Rosa hybrida Hort. among undergraduates: Focusing on students at D University in Gyeongsan-si. Master’s thesis Catholic University of Daegu; Gyeongsan-si, Korea:
Jang E. J., Hong J. W., Yoon S. E., Pak C. H., Han K. W.. 2010;Meta-analysis of research papers on horticultural therapy program effect. Horticultural Science and Technology 28(4):701–707.
Jeong M., Jea E. S., Lee S. M., Yi B. Y.. 2014;Effects of horticultural activities program focusing on four-season ornamental rooftop garden to be released on preschoolers’ creative thinking. Journal of Korean Society for People, Plants, and Environment 17(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2014.17.1.009.
Jeong S. H., Song J. Y., Lee S. M.. 2021. Analysis of agro-healing activities preference focused on horticulture for firefighters. In : Poster presented at the 2021 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for People, Plants, and Environment. Korea. Abstract P3-210613.
Kew Science. 2025. February. 10. Medicinal Plant Names Services Retrieved from https://mpns.science.kew.org/.
Kim D. U., Kim T. Y., Seong R.-S., Kang Y.. 2019;Importance of standardization in cultivation and processing for production of good herbal medicines. Korean Herbal Medicine Informatics 7(2):109–136. https://doi.org/10.22674/KHMI-7-2-1.
Kim H. A.. 2024. The impact of color lessons on self-understanding for 6th grade elementary school students. Master’s thesis Korea National University of Education; Chungbuk, Korea:
Kim J. W., Kim E. K., Chung J. M., Cho W.. 2024;Study on the current status of traditional knowledge of North Korean folk plants through interviews with North Korean defectors. Flower Research Journal (4):366–376. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2024.32.4.17.
Kim M., Hong M., Kim S.-Y., Kim S.. 2023;Visual sensibility of plants: Its application to healing agriculture. Weed and Turfgrass Science 12(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2023.12.1.023.
Kim M. J., Lee S. J.. 2019;A study on the edible parts and cooking methods for the Korean medicinal plants. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine 23(3):59–70. https://doi.org/10.25153/spkom.2019.23.3.006.
Kim Y., Kim Y., Choi J.. 2024;The usage of the healing program with ground cover plants and herbaceous flowers. Journal of recreation and landscape 18(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.51549/JORAL.2024.18.2.001.
Korea Forest Service. 2025. March. 20. National Standard Plant List Retrieved from http://www.nature.go.kr/kpni/index.do.
Korean Meteorological Administration. 2025. March. 6. Korean Meteorological Administration Retrieved from https://www.weather.go.kr/w/index.do.
Kwak J. S., Seong H. G., Chang K. J.. 2011. Cultivation of Medicinal Plants Seoul, Korea:
Lee E. J.. 2019. Effects of forest plant healing therapy on school life stress and emotions of college students. Master’s thesis Chungbuk National University; Cheongju, Korea:
Lee S. H.. 2015;The realization of the spirit of positive psychology through natural environments: Positive personality. The Korean Journal of Psychology 34(2):513–539.
Lee S. M., Kaufman A., Suh J. K.. 2012;Analysis of pulse on three sensory stimulations of three herbal. Journal of Korean Society for People, Plants, and Environment 15(4):241–247.
Lee S. M., Hong I. K., Jeong S. J., Moon J. W., Jo Y. S., Choi S. N., Shim Y. D.. 2024;Parallel themes of sowing in horticultural therapy: Focusing on psychosocial changes in prisoners. JJournal of Agriculture and Life Science 58(6):33–40. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2024.58.6.33.
Mc Vicar J.. 2010. Jekka’s complete herb book Nam S. Y., Soh C. H., Choi Y. H.. p. 70–71. Seoul, Korea: (Original work published 2009).
Ministry of Environment. 2024. December. 4. National Institute of Biological Resources; Retrieved from https://species.nibr.go.kr/index.do.
National Research Council of Science and Technology. 2025. March. 7. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine; Retrieved from https://kiom.re.kr/herblib/.
Oh S. Y., Heo C. M.. 2021;A study on the effect of care farming program on satisfaction: Focused on the mediating effect of functional image and emotional image. Journal of Digital Convergence 19(11):95–112. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.11.095.
Park K. W., Kwon M. H., Kim J. H.. 2019;Status of Korean herb garden, and model for children and blind. Life Science and Natural Resources Research 27:1–20. https://doi.org/10.33147/LSNRR.2019.27.1.1.
Park S. A., Lee A. Y., Lee G. J., Lee W. L., Bae S. J., Park B. J., Kim D. S.. 2017;A study of awareness and needs for care farming in South Korea. J People Plants Environ 20(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2017.20.1.019.
Rural Development Administration. 2025. March. 8. Nongsaro; Retrieved from https://www.nongsaro.go.kr/.
Song Y. E., Ku C. S., Mun S. P., Ryu J. S., Kim D. H., Choi J. S., Choi Y. G.. 2002;Volatile aroma compounds and their characteristics of Labiatae by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 10(2):120–125.
Son J. H.. 2020. Comparison of volatile flavor components in Compositae plants by GC-MS. Master’s thesis Chosun University; Gwangju, Korea:
The Academy of Korean Studies. 2024. December. 4. Encyclopedia of Korean Culture Retrieved from https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/.
The Society of Korean Medicine. 2024. December. 19. Standard Korean Medicine Terminology 2.1 Retrieved from https://www.skom.or.kr/.
Yang J. K.. 2020. Perennial herbs through mixed planting research on selection of plants with excellent ecological sustainability: focused on Seohan Group Garden. Master’s thesis Hanyang University; Seoul, Korea:
Yun S. H., Jeon S. H.. 2016. A study on planting design strategies in healing gardens. In : Proceedings of the 2016 Spring Conference of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. p. 13–14.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Exclusion criteria and status for selecting medicinal plants applicable to Agro-healing programs

Exclusion Criteria Number of Species Excluded Proportion
Woody and shrub species 165 24%
Marine plants and fauna 88 13%
Fungi 9 1%
Processed medicinal plants 44 6%
Species with difficulties in seed procurement 307 45%
Parasitic plants 8 1%
Spore-bearing plants 9 1%
Minerals and fossils 26 4%
Vegetatively propagated plants 9 1%
Resinous plants 3 0%
Others 15 2%
Total 683

Table 2

Botanical and horticultural characteristics of selected medicinal plants

Scientific name Crude Drug Name Common name Life form Plant family name Flowering season Flower Color Sowing season Harvesting season Edible portion
Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC. Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Licorice Perennial herb Fabaceae Summer PB Spring Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Brassicae Semen Brown mustard Annual or Biennial herb Brassicaceae Spring Y Spring, Summer, Autumn Summer, Autumn, Winter Stem, Leaf, Seed, Root
Oryza sativa L. Oryzae Semen Rice Annual herb Poaceae Summer White Spring Autumn Seed, Bran(Excluding rice husk), Young shoot
Oryzae Fructus Germinatus
Senna tora (L.) Roxb. Cassiae Semen Sicklepod Annual herb Fabaceae Summer Y Spring Autumn Leaf, Fruit
Oenothera biennis L. Semen Oenotherae Evening primrose Perennial herb Onagraceae Summer Y Spring, Summer Autumn Seed, Young shoot
Celosia argentea L. var. cristata (L.) Kuntze Celosiae Cristatae Flos Cockscomb Annual herb Amaranthaceae Summer R, Y, White Spring Autumn Flower
Cucumis melo L. Melonis Pedicellus Korean melon Annual herb Cucurbitaceae Summer Y Spring Summer Fruit, Seed
Agastache rugosa (Fisch. and C.A. Mey.) Kuntze Agastachis Herba Korean mint Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P Spring Harvested year-round Leaf
Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim. Trichosanthis Radix Mongolian snakegourd Perennial herb Cucurbitaceae Summer White Spring Autumn, Winter Not edible
Trichosanthis Semen Summer
Dianthus longicalyx Miq. Dianthi Herba Longcalyx pink Perennial herb Caryophyllaceae Summer RP Spring, Autumn Summer, Autumn Not edible
Dendranthema zawadskii (Herbich) Tzvelev var. latiloba (Maxim.) Kitam. Chrysanthemi Zawadskii Herba Korean chrysanthemum Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer R, White Spring, Autumn Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Calendula arvensis L. Flos Calendulae Pot marigold Annual herb Asteraceae Summer Y Spring Summer Flower
Impatiens balsamina L. Impatientis Semen Garden balsam Annual herb Balsaminaceae Summer R, P, White Spring Summer, Autumn Not edible
Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC. Platycodonis Radix Bellflower Perennial herb Campanulaceae Summer PB, White Spring Autumn Root, Leaf, Young shoot
Raphanus sativus L. Raphani Semen Radish Annual or Biennial herb Brassicaceae Spring White, R Summer Autumn Root, Leaf, Seed
Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek Vignae Radiatae Semen Mung bean Annual herb Fabaceae Summer PB Summer Autumn Seed, Sprout
Angelica gigas Nakai Angelicae Gigantis Radix Korean angelica Perennial herb Apiaceae Summer P Spring, Autumn Autumn Root, Leaf
Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. Codonopsis Pilosulae Radix Pilose bellflower Perennial herb Campanulaceae Summer P Spring Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Benincasa cerifera (Thunb.) Cogn. Benincasae Semen Winter melon Annual herb Cucurbitaceae Summer Y Spring, Autumn Summer, Autumn Fruit (excluding pericarp), Seed
Benincasae Exocarpium
Malva verticillata L. Malvae Fructus Cluster mallow Annual herb Malvaceae Summer R Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winte Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winte Leaf
Melissa officinalis L. Melissae folium Lemon balm Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer White, Y Spring, Summer Summer Leaf
Ruta graveolens L. Rutae herba Rue Perennial herb Rutaceae Summer Y Spring Summer Not edible
Liriope muscari (Decne.) L.H. Bailey Liriopis seu Ophiopogonis Tuber Lilyturf Perennial herb Asparagaceae Spring R Spring Summer Conditionally edible plants
Hordeum vulgare L. Hordei Fructus Germinatus Barley Perennial herb Poaceae Spring Y Autumn Summer Seed, Young shoot, Bran(Inner bran)
Panax ginseng C.A. Mey. Ginseng Radix Ginseng Perennial herb Araliaceae Spring GY Autumn, Winter Autumn Root, Stem, Leaf, Fruit, Seed
Mentha arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes Menthae Herba Corn mint Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer White, R Spring Summer, Autumn Aerial part
Atractylodes ovata (Thunb.) DC. Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba Ovata atractylodes Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer White Spring, Autumn Autumn~Spring Young shoot
Iris domestica (L.) Goldblatt and Mabb. Belamcandae Rhizoma Blackberry lily Perennial herb Iridaceae Summer YR Spring Spring, Autumn Not edible
Luffa cylindrica (L.) M. Roem. Luffae Fructus Retinervus Luffa Annual herb Cucurbitaceae Summer Y Spring Autumn Immature fruit
Thymus vulgaris L. Thymi Herba Thyme Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer R Spring Summer Leaf
Inula japonica Thunb. Inulae Flos Fleawort Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer Y Spring Summer, Autumn Leaf
Salvia officinalis L. Salviae officinalis folium Sage Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P Spring Summer Leaf
Mentha spicata L. Not Reported1 Spearmint Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P Winter~Summer, Summer Not edible
Bupleurum komarovianum Lincz. Bupleuri Radix Bupleurum Perennial herb Apiaceae Summer Y Spring, Autumn Autumn Leaf
Peucedanum japonicum Thunb. Peucedani Japonici Radix Coastal hogfennel Perennial herb Apiaceae Summer White Spring Autumn Young shoot, Stem, Leaf
Linum usitatissimum L. Lini Semen Flax Annual herb Linaceae Summer P, White Spring Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Artemisia indica Willd. Artemisiae Argyi Folium Indian wormwood Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer R Year-round Summer Leaf
Echinacea purpurea Echinaceae purpureae herba Purple coneflower Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer R Spring, Autumn Autumn Not edible
Echinaceae purpureae radix
Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Nelumbinis Plumula Sacred lotus Perennial herb Nelumbonaceae Summer R, White Spring Autumn Root, Leaf, Flower(including lotus, stamen), Seed(excluding embryo)
Nelumbinis Semen Autumn
Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce var. pluriflorum (Miq.) Ohwi Polygonati Odorati Rhizoma Solomon’s seal Perennial herb Asparagaceae Summer White Autumn Spring, Autumn Not edible
Orostachys japonica (Maxim.) A. Berger Orostachydis Herba Rock pine Perennial herb Crassulaceae Summer Y Spring, Summer Summer, Autumn Aerial part
Solanum nigrum L. Solani Nigri Herba Black nightshade Annual herb Solanaceae Summer White Spring Summer Conditionally edible plants
Gentiana scabra Bunge Gentianae Scabrae Radix et Rhizoma Rough gentian Perennial herb Gentianaceae Summer B Spring Spring, Autumn Root and Rhizome
Arctium lappa L. Arctii Radix Greater burdock Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer P Spring, Summer, Autumn Autumn Root, Leaf
Arctii Fructus Autumn
Achyranthes bidentata Blume var. japonica Miq. Achyranthis Radix Oriental chaff flower Perennial herb Amaranthaceae Summer G Spring Autumn Stem, Leaf
Brassica napus L. Brassicae Campestris Semen Canola Perennial herb Brassicaceae Spring Y Spring, Autumn Autumn Whole herb, Whole plant
Rape Seed Oil
Potentilla chinensis Ser. Potentillae Herba East Asian cinquefoil Perennial herb Rosaceae Summer Y Spring Spring Young shoot, Leaf
Leonurus japonicus Houtt. Leonuri Herba Motherwort Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P Spring, Autumn Summer Conditionally edible plants
Leonuri Semen Summer
Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton Perillae Japonicae Semen Perilla Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer White Summer Summer Leaf, Seed, Sprout
Lithospermum murasaki Siebold Lithospermi Radix Gromwell Perennial herb Boraginaceae Summer White Spring, Summer Spring, Autumn Root
Aster tataricus L.f. Asteris Radix et Rhizoma Starwort Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer P Year-round Spring, Autumn Young shoot
Viola mandshurica W. Becker Violae Herba Manchurian violet Perennial herb Violaceae Spring P Year-round Summer Young shoot, Leaf
Paeonia lactiflora Pall. Paeoniae Radix Peony Perennial herb Paeoniaceae Summer White, R Spring, Autumn Summer, Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Tanacetum cinerariifolium (Trevir.) Sch.Bip. Pyrethri Flos Pyrethrum Perennial herb Asteraceae Summer White Year-round Summer Not edible
Plantago asiatica L. Plantaginis Semen Asian plantain Perennial herb Plantaginaceae Summer White Spring, Autumn Summer, Autumn Leaf, Seed coat
Plantaginis Herba Summer
Artemisia annua L. Artemisiae Annuae Herba Sweet wormwood Annual herb Asteraceae Summer GY Spring, Autumn Autumn Conditionally edible plants
Alcea rosea L. Althaeae Flos Hollyhock Perennial herb Malvaceae Summer White, R, Y Spring, Autumn Summer Not edible
Carum carvi L. Carvi fructus Caraway Perennial herb Papaveraceae Summer White, R Spring, Summer Summer Young shoot, Leaf, Seed
Patrinia villosa (Thunb.) Juss. Patriniae Radix White patrinia Perennial herb Caprifoliaceae Summer Y Year-round Summer Leaf
Mentha × piperita L. Mentha Piperata Peppermint Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P Winter~Spring Summer Leaf
Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz. Taraxaci Herba Mongolian dandelion Perennial herb Asteraceae Spring Y Autumn Spring, Summer Root, Young shoot, Leaf, Whole herb
Ricinus communis L. Ricini Semen Castor oil plant Annual herb Euphorbiaceae Summer Y Spring Autumn Leaf
Prunella vulgaris L. subsp. asiatica (Nakai) H. Hara Prunellae Spica Selfheal Perennial herb Lamiaceae Summer P, R, White Spring, Autumn Summer Young shoot, Leaf, Flower stalk
Reynoutria multiflora (Thunb.) Moldenke Polygoni Multiflori Radix Chinese knotweed Perennial herb Polygonaceae Summer White Spring Autumn, Winter Tuberous root
Polygoni Multiflori Caulis Summer, Autumn
Carthamus tinctorius L. Carthami Flos Safflower Annual herb Asteraceae Summer Y Spring Summer Leaf, Seed
Astragalus penduliflorus Lam. var. dahuricus (DC.) X.Y. Zhu Astragali Radix Milk vetch Perennial herb Fabaceae Summer Y Spring Spring, Autumn Root, Leaf, Sprout
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Foeniculi Fructus Fennel Perennial herb Apiaceae Summer Y Spring, Autumn Summer Leaf, Leaf, Fruit
Saccharum officinarum L. Saccharum Nigrum Sugarcane Perennial herb Poaceae Summer White Summer Summer Leaf, Sap
Sesamum indicum L. Sesami Semen Nigra Sesame Annual herb Pedaliaceae Summer RP Summer Summer Seed

Note.

1

Not Reported means that the crude drug name of the plant has not been confirmed in official literature.