Effects of content types on user reactions
A multiple regression analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between the 14 place-based content types derived from Kew Gardens’ Instagram account and the structure of the two user reactions, “Likes” and “Comments” (
Table 5). First of all, through preliminary analysis, it was confirmed that there were no problems with normality, linearity, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity.
By verifying the correlation with “Likes” among the structure of user reactions for the 14 types of place-based contents in the botanical garden at a significance level of 0.001, the regression model was found to be statistically significant (F = 78.690, p < .001), and the explanatory power of the model was about 58.6% (adjusted R2 was 57.8%) (R2= .586, adj R2=.578). On the other hand, the Durbin-Watson statistic was 1.074, which was an approximation of 2, so it was evaluated that there was no problem in the assumption of the independence of the residuals; and the variance inflation factors (VIFs) were also 1.008 to 1.230, which was less than 10, indicating that there was no multicollinearity problem.
By testing the significance of the regression coefficient, the following were found to have a significant effect on “Likes,” in order of significance: plant close-ups (β = .523, p < .001), plant colony (β = .308, p < .001), place-specific landscape (β = .266, p < .001), information (β = .183, p < .001), anniversary (β = .151, p < .05), research (β = .143, p < .001), animal (β = .131, p < .001), exhibition (β =. 122, p < . 001), visitor (β = .114, p < .001), people working (β = .110, p < . 001).
Next, the results of verifying the effects of 14 content types on “Comments” showed that the regression model was statistically significant (F = 25.023, p < .001), and the explanatory power of the model was about 31.0% (adjusted R2 was 29.8%)(R2= .310, adj R2= .298). Meanwhile, the Durbin-Watson statistic was 1.933, which was approximately 2, so it was evaluated that there was no problem in the assumption of the independence of the residuals; and the VIFs were also 1.008 to 1.230, which were all less than 10, indicating that there was no multicollinearity problem.
By testing the significance of the regression coefficient, the following were found to have a significant effect on “Comments,” ranked in order of significance: plant close-ups (β = .292, p < .001), anniversary (β = .258, p < . 001), place-specific landscape (β = .221, p <.001), plant colony (β = .204, p < .001), information (β = .161, p < . 001), people working (β = .113, p < . 001), visitors (β = .106, p < . 001), exhibitions (β = .100, p < . 001).
To summarize the analysis results, first, it can be considered that the Kew Gardens Instagram account content that users prefer includes knowledge about plants, which is consistent with the botanical garden’s role as a public institution. This involves the finding that plant close-ups and plant colonies are the contents that have the greatest impact on both “Likes” and “Comments” when comparing the size of the standardized coefficients of multiple regression analysis. Since the contents containing plant close-ups and plant colonies are composed of vivid images and videos along with specific and specialized knowledge about plants such as the scientific name, form, and flowering period of the plant, such results can be considered to show the reactions of users’ expectations to the specific space itself, called a “botanical garden.”
Second, the type of place-specific landscape, which represented the second largest portion of user reactions after plant-related contents, can be regarded as contents containing the characteristics of a place representing Kew Gardens, which consists of the facilities of Kew Gardens and the surrounding landscape, including Palm House, Kew Palace, Princess of Wales Conservatory, Temperate House, Great Pagoda, and Kew Hive. This indicates that in addition to the knowledge of plants that can be expected from a botanical garden, users actively respond to contents sharing places and landscapes where knowledge related to history and culture harmonizes with nature; and it confirms that this is an important factor to consider when botanical gardens and national parks produce content in the future to induce users’ interest.
Third, it is considered that the anniversary-related content concentrated in the fourth quarter was used to increase the intention to visit the place and form a positive placeness through online word-of-mouth communication by sharing posts related to anniversaries such as Christmas and Halloween and utilizing the spatial characteristics as a medium. The following content can be interpreted as having a significant effect on both “Likes” and “Comments” as life-oriented content that enables interaction through users’ participation: content related to social and cultural communication familiar to users with high sympathy, such as anniversaries including Valentine’s Day, Easter, and Christmas; and in the same context, information-type content containing various useful information on exhibitions of works such as paintings or photographs of plants, events in the botanical garden, or discounts on tickets.
Fourth, animal and research content types had a significant effect on “Likes” while showing low significance with “Comments” Considering that “Comments” are more active behavioral reactions than “Likes,” it can be observed that the level of empathy and behavioral variables are markedly different depending on the type of content. This confirms an efficient method for providing information by type and utilizing images when a specific public institution such as a botanical garden tries to share and spread its content in the future.
User interactions with the image contents of Kew Gardens were found to be shown as independent behavioral reactions for each content type. It can be interpreted that users show the behavioral reaction of “Likes” which is an easy way to express empathy, for content perceived as useful information, and that they respond with “Comments,” a more direct form of communication, only to content that provides expert knowledge or arouses sufficient empathy. To induce users’ recommendations and word of mouth through image-based social media, it will be necessary to produce and provide content in consideration of the characteristics of social media and user behavior. In particular, since social media contributes to overcoming informational limits in relation to the attributes of experiential products that can be known only after using the products and services (Gruen et al., 2003), it can be seen that it plays an important role in forming a positive image and attachment to a place through the user’s place awareness by providing various information about a place and sharing a space online.