Changes in hand functions
The Purdue Pegboard test was conducted to assess hand functions. The score of the dominant hand of subjects before participating in horticultural activities was 14.2 (SD = 3.7), and the score after participating in planting, wrapping pots, making mini flower baskets, wrapping a single flower and making corsages was 14.4 (SD = 3.7), 14.7 (SD = 4.2), 15.0 (SD = 3.0), 14.5 (SD = 3.9), and 14.9 (SD = 3.6) respectively, maintaining the average level of people with mental disabilities. There was no significant difference between programs (
p = .639). The score of the non-dominant hand of subjects before participating in horticultural activities was 12.8 (SD = 2.8), and the score after participating in planting, wrapping pots, making mini flower baskets, wrapping a single flower and making corsages was 12.6 (SD = 2.4), 13.0 (SD = 3.1), 14.0 (SD = 3.2), 13.4 (SD = 4.3), and 13.5 (SD = 2.9) respectively, maintaining the average level of people with mental disabilities. There was no significant difference between programs (
p = .248). The score of the both hands of subjects before participating in horticultural activities was 10.5 (SD = 2.8), and the score after participating in planting, wrapping pots, making mini flower baskets, wrapping a single flower and making corsages was 10.5 (SD = 2.6), 10.6 (SD = 2.4), 10.5 (SD = 2.0), 10.3 (SD = 2.7), and 10.9 (SD = 2.4) respectively, maintaining the average level of people with mental disabilities. There was no significant difference between programs (
p = .856). The score of the assembly of subjects before participating in horticultural activities was 23.6 ± 10.5, and the score after participating in planting, wrapping pots, making mini flower baskets, wrapping a single flower and making corsages was 26.6 (SD = 11.5), 27.7 (SD = 12.2), 28.0 (SD = 13.9), 26.9 (SD = 12.0), and 29.1 (SD = 11.9) respectively. The score before participation was the average level of people with mental disabilities and the score increased above the average level, and there were significant differences between programs (
p = .016;
Table 2).
No significant effect was observed in the results of the dominant and non-dominant hand and both hands of subjects, but the results of assembly showed significant differences in hand functions. These results were similar to those of earlier studies.
Chang et al. (2005) reported that occupational therapy activity programs to improve hand functions improved not only the hand functions of those with intellectual disabilities but also their ability to perform tasks that required hand functions.
Lee and Kim (2010) provided horticultural therapy programs for those with intellectual disabilities, and reported that the power of fingertips, the grip strength of hands, and the power of wrists increased after participating in a topiary program, that the power of fingertips significantly increased after participating in a pressed flower program that used hands or tweezers to pick up materials. The grip strength of hands also increased after participating in a flower decoration program that frequently used scissors, and the power of wrists was strengthened after participating in a planting program in the study. As hands are used as a tool to perform various activities and tasks in daily life, and play an important role in performing tasks also in workplaces, the number of those who need activities to improve hand functions among special-education school students continues to increase (
Chang et al., 2005). These results indicate that horticultural activities can improve the hand functions and work performance of people with mental disabilities, help them fully perform their role and thus contribute to their adaptation to workplaces.
Changes in working speed and observation of individuals
The time spent to produce 10 pieces of the same product was measured, and that spent for the activity of planting decreased from 9.9 (SD = 4.0) minutes in the first class to 6.0 (SD = 2.3) minutes in the second class (
p = .018). The time spent for the activity of making mini flower baskets decreased from 35.2 (SD = 10.1) minutes in the first class to 21.0 (SD = 7.7) minutes in the second class (
p = .018), and that spent for the activity of wrapping a single flower decreased from 23.3 (SD = 7.9) minutes in the first class to 16.2 (SD = 7.3) minutes in the second class (
p = .043). The time spent for the activity of making corsages also decreased from 53.6 (SD = 15.9) in the first class to 40.8 (SD = 16.8) minutes in the second class (
p = .043). These results showed that the time spent for the second class significantly decreased from the time spent in the first class. The time spent for the activity of wrapping pots slightly decreased from 52.7 (SD = 11.7) minutes in the first class to 49.6 (SD = 17.8) minutes in the second class, but there was no significant difference (
p = .398;
Table 3).
Subject A wrapped flowers off the center of a wrapping paper at first, but after repeating the activity several times the subject wrapped flowers well checking the center. In the first class of making mini flower baskets, Subject A tended to make baskets with flowers at the same height, but in the second class the subject arranged flowers at different heights. In the first class of making corsages, Subject A thought over various ways to do it easily and tried various ways and in the second class they seemed to enjoy the task humming a song.
Subject B similar to Subject A also could not wrap flowers well at first, but successfully found the center of a wrapping paper after repeating it.
Subject C seemed to feel uncomfortable and stressed wrapping pots and wrapping a single flower and to feel unconfident about outcomes at first, but said the outcomes were beautiful and resolved to make them better later at the end of the first class, showing satisfaction with them. In addition, Subject C seemed to feel uncomfortable water-proofing pots even in the second class, and thus an instructor told the subject how to do one more time. After that, Subject C successfully completed the task without any help, showing a more smooth process and better outcomes. In the first class of making mini flower baskets, leaves on stem were not cleanly removed, or flowers tended to be put too deeply, with some stems penetrating through a floral foam. However, in the second class, some improvements were observed. In particular, when being praised, Subject C looked very grateful and happy.
Subject D planted 10 pieces one after another in the first class of planting, but in the second class the subject divided the task into several steps, and performed the task more efficiently by completing one step for 10 pieces at once and doing the next step. Subject D seemed to be unskilled at making mini flower baskets at first, but to be strongly determined to do it alone, and thus listened carefully to instructions and asked questions as soon as any problems or questions about horticulture came up. In addition, in the second class, Subject D checked necessary materials voluntarily.
Subject E seemed to feel tired after wrapping three pots, and took a break after completing one repeatedly, showing a slow working speed in the first class. In the second class, for the first three pots, the subject seemed to be confused about the process of wrapping pots, but wrapped the rest pots alone without taking a break. In the first class of wrapping a single flower, flowers were wrapped loosely, but in the second class Subject E could fix flowers firmly. Making corsages seemed to be difficult, but Subject E said it was fun and showed a higher concentration and interest compared to other classes. After completing the program, the subject said it was fun to do manual tasks.
Subject F similar to Subject D planted 10 pieces one after another in the first class, but in the second class Subject F divided the task into several steps, and performed the task more efficiently by completing one step for 10 pieces at once and doing the next step. The subject hurriedly finished the activity of wrapping pots at first, but started to wrap them slowly from the 5th pot in the first class. After completing 10 pieces, Subject F even compared the first one with the last one. In the second class, the subject cleaned the desk while doing the task. In the class of making mini flower baskets, Subject F showed a higher concentration and interest, and came forward to see the demonstration of the instructor more closely, and said that Subject F found oneself passive, but became more active as classes were repeated.
In the class of making mini flower baskets and wrapping a single flower, Subject G started to help distribute materials before the classes and help others complete the task before the class was completed. In the class of wrapping a single flower, after finishing the task early, Subject G helped others who were struggling and took photos of the products the subject made, being pleased with them. Subject G seemed to be very shy at first, but started to talk more and look happy as classes were repeated.
As subjects repeated tasks, they started to identify problems on their own and tried new ways to address them and reduce their working speed, gradually increasing the completeness of their products. Repeating tasks improved their understanding of tasks and skills, which demonstrated that it was effective in acquiring skills rapidly and precisely. In addition, the passive attitudes of subjects in the early stage were gradually replaced by pleasant, active and friendly images.
There are many types of disorders and the ability to work and adaptability vary significantly. Those with disabilities and their parents said that only very few training programs customized for each type of disorders were available and that efficient training programs needed to be provided considering their characteristics (
Lee, 2012). As a series of crimes committed by those with schizophrenia have been reported recently, schizophrenia, a type of mental disorder, has was put on the list of search keywords on the Internet for a while as a social issue. The people with mental disabilities are usually like normal people but it is still difficult to completely guarantee their safety. Even those who received training are not trained for other elements apart from work-related skills. For this reason employers themselves may not make decisions easily and for this reason people with mental disabilities may not find a job even after diligently participating in vocational rehabilitation training (
Lee, 2012). In addition, the economically inactive population of those with disabilities were surveyed on their subjectively assessed possibility of employment, and the majority of those who intended to work answered that they could ‘work for a short time or do a simple work (50.2%)’ (
Korea Employment Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 2018). Therefore, considering the characteristics of people with mental disabilities, workplaces that do not require staying at work for a long time or additional training for adaptation to the working environment but require working skills only like part-time works or working from home are recommended to reduce burden both on employers and employees. Providing training that applies repetitive tasks for people with mental disabilities to learn work skills intensively considering their characteristics is expected to be effective when providing vocational rehabilitation for them.